This is just silly and seems hypocritical
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
I'm pretty sure that was the object as well as to mock and deride other people for their beliefs.
And I can believe you are wrong.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Certainly. Which makes them all the greater hypocrits
Wrong. You are ascribing intent and then drawing a conclusion from that.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
False logic. But thanks for the tacit agreement that what they did was hypocritical and intolerant.
You are claiming that religions do not have hypocrises? As to the second - I made no such statement.
jschell wrote:
And I can believe you are wrong.
Go ahead.
jschell wrote:
You are ascribing intent
No, they stated their intentions.
jschell wrote:
claiming
I make no claims. I was referring to the fact that you used your claim of hypocrisy in one group to justify hypocrisy in another.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
Atheists use ‘unholy water’ to ‘unbless’ Florida highway[^] Since atheists don't believe in God or the Divine nor in the Holy or in Blessings, how can they believe in anything "unholy" or in "unblessing"? If you are "undoing" something doesn't that mean you give credence to the "doing" of a thing? Just a thought. I don't really care one way or the other. Just seems contradictory and hypocritical to me for an atheist to "undo" anything that a religionist "does".
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von BraunIt is hypocritical. It is hard to know exactly what atheists do believe. According to Dictionary.com[^] an atheist is someone "who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings." So, everyone atheist I have ever met is hypocritical because they all believe in a supreme being. They just do not believe in the God that religions preach. According to the article the organization is http://www.floridahumanist.org/index.htm[^]. I didn't look too hard but I didn't see their website claim that they were atheist so for all we know it may just be poor journalism labeling them incorrectly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
jschell wrote:
your church and your home
My home is also the public sphere in which I reside. But atheists want to prevent all public expressions of religion.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braunahmed zahmed wrote:
My home is also the public sphere in which I reside
No it isn't. In my home I have the right to defecate any place that I feel like. I do not have that right outside my home.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
But atheists want to prevent all public expressions of religion.
You are wrong. Rights are not absolute - your rights only extend so far as they do not infringe on my rights. Thus you can no more erect a 1000 ft statue festoned with laser of your god on the court house steps than you can on your own property because such a monstrosity would infringe on numerous others.
-
ahmed zahmed wrote:
Speech is still speech, and the atheists want protection of theirs and prevention of others.
I am rather certain that the supreme court, the framers of the US constitution and many current religious leaders would disagree with your attempt to bundle religion and speech into the same thing.
Speech entails more than using words coming out of your mouth and from pen on a piece of paper. Speech also actions. Flag burning is speech. Protesting is speech. Civil disobedience is speech. All constitutionally protected forms of speech. Religion is all about words coming from my mouth, my pen and it is all about my actions and how I comport myself with other people. All forms of speech. Speech that you want to prevent.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
I hope you meant "your" in the 2nd person, and even then, bigotry is probably the wrong word for what you are trying to express.
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
No I wasn't claiming "you" are bigoted, I have no evidence of that.
wizardzz wrote:
wrong word for what you are trying to express.
Maybe, I'm not as articulate as I'd like to be.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
ahmed zahmed wrote:
My home is also the public sphere in which I reside
No it isn't. In my home I have the right to defecate any place that I feel like. I do not have that right outside my home.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
But atheists want to prevent all public expressions of religion.
You are wrong. Rights are not absolute - your rights only extend so far as they do not infringe on my rights. Thus you can no more erect a 1000 ft statue festoned with laser of your god on the court house steps than you can on your own property because such a monstrosity would infringe on numerous others.
jschell wrote:
No it isn't.
The Supremes disagree. I can certainly carry on religious activities anywhere I like in public. It may require a permit in some cases, just like have a demonstration may require a permit, but it's allowed.
jschell wrote:
right to defecate
Religious expression is not defecation.
jschell wrote:
You are wrong.
No, I'm correct. That is the stated goals of most atheist organizations: to remove religion from the public sphere and inhibit the free speech rights of a significant portion of the population.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
ahmed zahmed wrote:
My home is also the public sphere in which I reside
No it isn't. In my home I have the right to defecate any place that I feel like. I do not have that right outside my home.
ahmed zahmed wrote:
But atheists want to prevent all public expressions of religion.
You are wrong. Rights are not absolute - your rights only extend so far as they do not infringe on my rights. Thus you can no more erect a 1000 ft statue festoned with laser of your god on the court house steps than you can on your own property because such a monstrosity would infringe on numerous others.
jschell wrote:
In my home I have the right to defecate any place that I feel like.
I do not have that right outside my home.Anymore... those lucky pioneers and natives enjoyed outdoor shatting. BTW, you are trying to explain the same points I was, though you are being a little more direct and confrontational, you are being much more humorous about it. Your thread is killing me. :laugh: :laugh:
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
mark merrens wrote:
I don't recall preaching.
mark merrens wrote:
I have no interest in your personal insanity./blockquote> Just saying. :-D
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
That is not preaching that is me telling you to fock off and leave me alone!
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
I doubt it would have made any difference.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
mark merrens wrote:
I doubt it would have made any difference.
No, it wouldn't have. Hence the :) .
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
Sorry: missed it: knackered, long day.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
It is hypocritical. It is hard to know exactly what atheists do believe. According to Dictionary.com[^] an atheist is someone "who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings." So, everyone atheist I have ever met is hypocritical because they all believe in a supreme being. They just do not believe in the God that religions preach. According to the article the organization is http://www.floridahumanist.org/index.htm[^]. I didn't look too hard but I didn't see their website claim that they were atheist so for all we know it may just be poor journalism labeling them incorrectly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
ryanb31 wrote:
So, everyone atheist I have ever met is hypocritical because they all believe in a supreme being.
Ergo, every 'atheist' you ever met did not know the meaning of the word atheist. I would consider that most unlikely, but perhaps in American everyday usage 'atheist' means 'not religious'. I don't believe in gods. There, now you've 'met' one.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
-
It is hypocritical. It is hard to know exactly what atheists do believe. According to Dictionary.com[^] an atheist is someone "who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings." So, everyone atheist I have ever met is hypocritical because they all believe in a supreme being. They just do not believe in the God that religions preach. According to the article the organization is http://www.floridahumanist.org/index.htm[^]. I didn't look too hard but I didn't see their website claim that they were atheist so for all we know it may just be poor journalism labeling them incorrectly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Goodness this discussion still going on? Sure people are entitled to have a belief and correct me if I'm wrong, but to my mind an atheist is somebody that simply does not believe in god, end of story.
-
ryanb31 wrote:
So, everyone atheist I have ever met is hypocritical because they all believe in a supreme being.
Ergo, every 'atheist' you ever met did not know the meaning of the word atheist. I would consider that most unlikely, but perhaps in American everyday usage 'atheist' means 'not religious'. I don't believe in gods. There, now you've 'met' one.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
The UK is often referred to as a godless country so I can believe the definition is more accurate there. So, you do not believe in any supreme being? What do you believe in?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Goodness this discussion still going on? Sure people are entitled to have a belief and correct me if I'm wrong, but to my mind an atheist is somebody that simply does not believe in god, end of story.
It is someone who does not believe in a supreme being. My point was all atheists I have met in person claimed to be atheist because they did not believe in the Christian God; but they did believe in a supreme being, which means they actually were not atheists.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
It is someone who does not believe in a supreme being. My point was all atheists I have met in person claimed to be atheist because they did not believe in the Christian God; but they did believe in a supreme being, which means they actually were not atheists.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Not sure about a Christian God, I have always assumed if there is one they would be one and the same, all derived from past folklore history. But if nothing else, it appears the existence or non existence of God as a subject creates lively debate in CP Soapbox. :)
-
Evangelists - piss me off big time. Leave me alone, I do not want to join your church or study your silly book so do not accost me in the street (happened 3 times yesterday - told the last one I was a satanist - the look on his face was priceless). That's what I meant: keep your beliefs to yourself.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
The UK is often referred to as a godless country so I can believe the definition is more accurate there. So, you do not believe in any supreme being? What do you believe in?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
ryanb31 wrote:
The UK is often referred to as a godless country
No, a majority believe in a supreme being but, in the main, are not religious (i.e., do not attend a place of worship).
ryanb31 wrote:
so I can believe the definition is more accurate there.
Well, I have never met an atheist who believed in a supreme being. Again, if your experience of Americans who call themselves atheists is that they all believe in a supreme being, you had better teach them the meaning of the word atheist, and put them right. BTW: I have assumed the meaning of godless to be 'atheistic' in this context.
ryanb31 wrote:
What do you believe in?
Put quite simply, me.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
-
The UK is often referred to as a godless country so I can believe the definition is more accurate there. So, you do not believe in any supreme being? What do you believe in?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
ryanb31 wrote:
The UK is often referred to as a godless country so I can believe the definition is more accurate there.
Unlikely. The UK is primarily a Christian country, based on figures out of the last census. In the 2001 census, 71% of census respondents listed their religion as Christian. The 2011 census did not see a significant shift from this figure.
*pre-emptive celebratory nipple tassle jiggle* - Sean Ewington
"Mind bleach! Send me mind bleach!" - Nagy Vilmos
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
ryanb31 wrote:
The UK is often referred to as a godless country
No, a majority believe in a supreme being but, in the main, are not religious (i.e., do not attend a place of worship).
ryanb31 wrote:
so I can believe the definition is more accurate there.
Well, I have never met an atheist who believed in a supreme being. Again, if your experience of Americans who call themselves atheists is that they all believe in a supreme being, you had better teach them the meaning of the word atheist, and put them right. BTW: I have assumed the meaning of godless to be 'atheistic' in this context.
ryanb31 wrote:
What do you believe in?
Put quite simply, me.
Use carrots and sticks to force the little fish into the big tent - Anon
I am sharing the opinion of many Americans, and many of us do believe England is a godless country. Could be wrong. I don't think we are alone though. Quick google search[^] Lots of the results back it up. Again, I am not making a statement of fact, just a perception of the UK.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
It is someone who does not believe in a supreme being. My point was all atheists I have met in person claimed to be atheist because they did not believe in the Christian God; but they did believe in a supreme being, which means they actually were not atheists.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.