Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Product Lifecycle
  3. Free Tools
  4. JetBrains DotNetPeek decompiler tool.

JetBrains DotNetPeek decompiler tool.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Free Tools
csharpcomhelpannouncement
1 Posts 1 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Septimus Hedgehog
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Duplicate post I put on the lounge forum: As a long-time ReSharper user I got an email from them this morning letting me know there's a free download of their decompiler on their website. Here's the site: http://blogs.jetbrains.com/dotnet/ I'm pretty sure that many of you know about the issue concerning Lutz Roeder's DotNet Reflector and the response to it that created the open source ILSpy. I liked ILSpy but I sort of got the impression that once created it dried up a little as the developers rightly have other jobs to do. Having spent only a little time with JetBrain's DotNetPeek I think it's very good so far and it passed muster with an assembly that Redgate's version of DotNet Reflector had serious problems decompiling and which ILSpy was maybe 95% successful. DotNetPeek decompiled it 100% successfully and the side-by-side comparison to the original source code was bang on the money. And, no, I don't work for JetBrains. Finally, the price is right, free. Wink | ;) Smile | :)

    "I do not have to forgive my enemies, I have had them all shot." — Ramón Maria Narváez (1800-68).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups