Why...

[Dave Kreskowiak]

Just shake your head back and forth in disbelief and move on. Try not to think about the abominations you see in someone elses code because there are a LOT of them out there.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak

[Moykn]

I wish it was the worst... did you mind making pagination using a foreach and 2 counters?

[Mark_Wallace]

Moykn wrote:

Sorry, my english is bad!

Not as bad as the language-use you reported.

I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

[Lost User]

That's not too bad. Bad, certainly, but I'm not impressed yet. You said this isn't the worst - what is?

[Moykn]

harold aptroot wrote:

That's not too bad. Bad, certainly, but I'm not impressed yet. You said this isn't the worst - what is?

Quote:

pagination using a foreach and 2 counters?

[Pete OHanlon]

Moykn wrote:

object.Property = true ? "1":"0";

Surely that's

object.Property == true ? "1" : "0";

I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

[Albert Holguin]

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

Try not to think about the abominations you see in someone elses code because

....there's probably a lot in your code too... :-D

[Dave Kreskowiak]

Entirely possible! :laugh:

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak

[Albert Holguin]

Yeah, looks like debug code that's somehow stayed in the main repo...

[Dave Kreskowiak]

Moykn wrote:

did you mind making pagination using a foreach and 2 counters?

<Hands over ears>LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU LA LA LA LA LA LA</Hands over ears>

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
Dave Kreskowiak

[S Houghtelin]

Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

Surely that's

object.Property == true ? "1" : "0";

You're correct, and don't call me Shirley! :)

It was broke, so I fixed it.

[Moykn]

Totally agree I don't think myself as the best coder in the world, there's a lot i need to learn(a better english, for example).

[PIEBALDconsult]

Looked OK to me. Silly, but OK.

[Moykn]

nope.. what have to be done is set "property" not evaluate its value.

Sorry, my english is bad!

[Pete OHanlon]

Then that makes even less sense. So, this code is evaluating true and assigning the result back. Okey dokey.

I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

[AspDotNetDev]

Because this:

valueReturn = (3 * 60).ToString();

means 3 minutes, but this:

valueReturn = "180";

means the opposite.

Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

[TheGreatAndPowerfulOz]

OMG! WTF??!! :omg: :wtf: :mad: :sigh: :(( :~ X|

If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein