Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Robertson and Bush...

Robertson and Bush...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comtutorial
52 Posts 17 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J JoeSox

    I have been told that Bush receives daily recomendations from Pat Robertson on how to execute god's plan. Here is a nice background article about Robertson and Bush. American Democracy is and has been in trouble for a while(if you believe that JFK was shot by one man, there is something wrong with you), I just wish the major of Americans would see it. http://www.detnet.com/wilke/robertson1.htm[^] Later,
    JoeSox

    Load my Sig here.....

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Austin
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    JoeSox wrote: if you believe that JFK was shot by one man, there is something wrong with you I for one only believe things which can be proven. Not things that are popularized by BAD Oliver Stone Docu-Dramas. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

    J P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Robert Vista

      Yeah, that looks like a reliable source.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      JoeSox
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Robert Vista wrote: Yeah, that looks like a reliable source. I don't understand, can you please expand on your thought?:confused: Later,
      JoeSox

      Load my Sig here.....

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J JoeSox

        I have been told that Bush receives daily recomendations from Pat Robertson on how to execute god's plan. Here is a nice background article about Robertson and Bush. American Democracy is and has been in trouble for a while(if you believe that JFK was shot by one man, there is something wrong with you), I just wish the major of Americans would see it. http://www.detnet.com/wilke/robertson1.htm[^] Later,
        JoeSox

        Load my Sig here.....

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Tim Smith
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        I'm sorry. I didn't receive my list of approved American citizens. :rolleyes: I guess Susan Sarandon and Barbara Streisand weren't available to consult with Bush. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Tim Smith

          I'm sorry. I didn't receive my list of approved American citizens. :rolleyes: I guess Susan Sarandon and Barbara Streisand weren't available to consult with Bush. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          JoeSox
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          :laugh: Later,
          JoeSox

          Load my Sig here.....

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Russell Morris

            JoeSox wrote: American Democracy is and has been in trouble for a while Why is it a requirement that a president (or any political figure) be an atheist? -- Russell Morris "Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"

            J Offline
            J Offline
            JoeSox
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Russell Morris wrote: Why is it a requirement that a president (or any political figure) be an atheist? It is important to keep Religion and State seperate. "Guard against those men who make a great noise about religion, when choosing your representatives....Never promote men who seek after a state-established religion; it is spiritual tyranny--the worst of despotism. " http://members.tripod.com/~candst/leland5.htm[^] Later,
            JoeSox

            Load my Sig here.....

            S R W 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • J JoeSox

              Robert Vista wrote: Yeah, that looks like a reliable source. I don't understand, can you please expand on your thought?:confused: Later,
              JoeSox

              Load my Sig here.....

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tim Smith
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              He basically said your source sounds like some of the mind numbed and delusional UFO/psychic/conspiracy theories nuts we get over at JREF. (JREF being the James Randi Educational Foundation at www.randi.org[^].) Then again, I might be putting words in his mouth. :laugh: Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Austin

                JoeSox wrote: if you believe that JFK was shot by one man, there is something wrong with you I for one only believe things which can be proven. Not things that are popularized by BAD Oliver Stone Docu-Dramas. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                J Offline
                J Offline
                JoeSox
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                How can it be proven when the evidence was tampered?? Please read Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in... (if you haven't already) and get back to me. Later,
                JoeSox

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Joshua Guy

                  If I'm not mistaken Clinton got spritual/marriage advice from Jessie Jackson, who towards the end of Clinton's presidency admitted to having a child with a woman other than his wife, needless to say I feel much better about Bush being in office. Joshua Guy


                  Sonork ID: 100.9944 ICQ: 519642 Hotmail: JoshuaJGuy@hotmail.com

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  JoeSox
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Joshua Guy wrote: I feel much better about Bush being in office I'd rather have some guy getting a BJ then some guy making money off of his wars, while getting advice from Pat Robertson.:laugh: We should just elect Homer Simpson Later,
                  JoeSox

                  D R 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • J JoeSox

                    Joshua Guy wrote: I feel much better about Bush being in office I'd rather have some guy getting a BJ then some guy making money off of his wars, while getting advice from Pat Robertson.:laugh: We should just elect Homer Simpson Later,
                    JoeSox

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    DFU23
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    JoeSox wrote: We should just elect Homer Simpson That would be great ... whenever he made a blunder (i.e. Bush and his pronouncing certain English words -> strategery) he could just say "D'OH!" ... and we would laugh and feel that everything is OK.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Austin

                      JoeSox wrote: if you believe that JFK was shot by one man, there is something wrong with you I for one only believe things which can be proven. Not things that are popularized by BAD Oliver Stone Docu-Dramas. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Chris Austin wrote: I for one only believe things which can be proven. Not things that are popularized by BAD Oliver Stone Docu-Dramas So what do you believe on the matter then?

                      Paul Watson
                      Bluegrass
                      Cape Town, South Africa

                      Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J JoeSox

                        How can it be proven when the evidence was tampered?? Please read Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in... (if you haven't already) and get back to me. Later,
                        JoeSox

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Austin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        JoeSox wrote: Please read Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in... (if you haven't already) and get back to me. I've read it (I think in 92 or 93 -sophomore year of collage) as well as a dozen other papers supporting a conspiracy. Hell I was the biggest conspiracy nut I knew at the time. But now, I have changed. I need hard proof if I am going to believe anything (this used to really piss off my vendors when I would ask them to "Show me the Data"). Many of these authors draw on evidence tampering, of course the ballistics, and shoddy sources. They have yet to prove it without question. Until then is just another theory in my mind. JoeSox wrote: How can it be proven when the evidence was tampered?? One could even argue that those purporting an un-proven theory are also tampering by spreading “ideas” as facts. I can’t help but remember some of the implications of Heisenberg’s principle: by measuring or interacting with a system we alter it. BTW. I’m not saying it wasn’t a conspiracy, I am just not convinced. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Paul Watson

                          Chris Austin wrote: I for one only believe things which can be proven. Not things that are popularized by BAD Oliver Stone Docu-Dramas So what do you believe on the matter then?

                          Paul Watson
                          Bluegrass
                          Cape Town, South Africa

                          Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Chris Austin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Paul Watson wrote: So what do you believe on the matter then? I believe that it hasn't been proven. And Oliver Stone movies are very BAD:). What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J JoeSox

                            Russell Morris wrote: Why is it a requirement that a president (or any political figure) be an atheist? It is important to keep Religion and State seperate. "Guard against those men who make a great noise about religion, when choosing your representatives....Never promote men who seek after a state-established religion; it is spiritual tyranny--the worst of despotism. " http://members.tripod.com/~candst/leland5.htm[^] Later,
                            JoeSox

                            Load my Sig here.....

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stan Shannon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            JoeSox wrote: It is important to keep Religion and State seperate. Is it important to keep morality and state seperate? "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                            J A K 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • C Chris Austin

                              JoeSox wrote: Please read Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in... (if you haven't already) and get back to me. I've read it (I think in 92 or 93 -sophomore year of collage) as well as a dozen other papers supporting a conspiracy. Hell I was the biggest conspiracy nut I knew at the time. But now, I have changed. I need hard proof if I am going to believe anything (this used to really piss off my vendors when I would ask them to "Show me the Data"). Many of these authors draw on evidence tampering, of course the ballistics, and shoddy sources. They have yet to prove it without question. Until then is just another theory in my mind. JoeSox wrote: How can it be proven when the evidence was tampered?? One could even argue that those purporting an un-proven theory are also tampering by spreading “ideas” as facts. I can’t help but remember some of the implications of Heisenberg’s principle: by measuring or interacting with a system we alter it. BTW. I’m not saying it wasn’t a conspiracy, I am just not convinced. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              JoeSox
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Chris Austin wrote: BTW. ...I am just not convinced. That's the way they wanted it, for the truth to always be untold, so it will never be proven. Later,
                              JoeSox

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Austin

                                Paul Watson wrote: So what do you believe on the matter then? I believe that it hasn't been proven. And Oliver Stone movies are very BAD:). What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                Paul Watson
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                Chris Austin wrote: Paul Watson wrote: So what do you believe on the matter then? I believe that it hasn't been proven. Damn Chris, you are taking tips from the politicians aren't you? ;) Guess many of us could learn from you in being able to admit we have no opinion on the matter when we do not know the facts.

                                Paul Watson
                                Bluegrass
                                Cape Town, South Africa

                                Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                                C R 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • J JoeSox

                                  Chris Austin wrote: BTW. ...I am just not convinced. That's the way they wanted it, for the truth to always be untold, so it will never be proven. Later,
                                  JoeSox

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Chris Austin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  The problem is is I don't belive that there is a "they". Who are "they"? The best thing I have ever seen that has covered this is "The Ilumanatis Trilogy"...frickin hillarious. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                                  J R 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Stan Shannon

                                    JoeSox wrote: It is important to keep Religion and State seperate. Is it important to keep morality and state seperate? "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    JoeSox
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Stan Shannon wrote: Is it important to keep morality and state seperate? mo·ral·i·ty 1)The quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct. 2)A system of ideas of right and wrong conduct: religious morality; Christian morality. 3)Virtuous conduct. 4)A rule or lesson in moral conduct. Which definition of "morality" are you referring to? Then I can answer your question;) Later,
                                    JoeSox

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Paul Watson

                                      Chris Austin wrote: Paul Watson wrote: So what do you believe on the matter then? I believe that it hasn't been proven. Damn Chris, you are taking tips from the politicians aren't you? ;) Guess many of us could learn from you in being able to admit we have no opinion on the matter when we do not know the facts.

                                      Paul Watson
                                      Bluegrass
                                      Cape Town, South Africa

                                      Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Chris Austin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      LOL!... My biggest conflict is that I want to belive in a consiparicy. But no one has been able to prove it to me. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stan Shannon

                                        JoeSox wrote: It is important to keep Religion and State seperate. Is it important to keep morality and state seperate? "Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an art." Charles McCabe, San Francisco Chronicle

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        Of course not. Faith requires Morality, but Morality doesn't require Faith. Personally, I'd be ecstatic if everyone did have Faith, but realistically it's not going to happen anytime soon...and I'd rather not have religion jammed down the throats of those who don't have Faith. It doesn't work. Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

                                        "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                                        - Marcia Graesch

                                        Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C Chris Austin

                                          The problem is is I don't belive that there is a "they". Who are "they"? The best thing I have ever seen that has covered this is "The Ilumanatis Trilogy"...frickin hillarious. What Would Uncle Steve Do?. -Michael Martin

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          JoeSox
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          Chris Austin wrote: The problem is is I don't belive that there is a "they". so you believe it is a he or she?:-D they, meaning many people:-D I hear what you are saying. Later,
                                          JoeSox

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups