Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Being pro-peace...

Being pro-peace...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharpquestionannouncement
44 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K KaRl

    Michael A. Barnhart wrote: "I do not think either of us believe that just an example that they are not equal labels." I don't understand this sentence :|


    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Michael A Barnhart
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    It was poorly punctuated so: To rephrase it. The preceding sentence is one that I do not believe to be factual or correct and do not think you believe it to be factual or correct. I am just using it as an example as to why I do not believe that Anti-War automatically equals Pro-Peace. "I will find a new sig someday."

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Michael A Barnhart

      It was poorly punctuated so: To rephrase it. The preceding sentence is one that I do not believe to be factual or correct and do not think you believe it to be factual or correct. I am just using it as an example as to why I do not believe that Anti-War automatically equals Pro-Peace. "I will find a new sig someday."

      K Offline
      K Offline
      KaRl
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      _Ah _ok, sorry, I have totally missed your point.


      Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop__

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        As long as the inspectors will say they can do their jobs, no war is needed, whatever might say the State Department. The US behaviour in foreign policy since the elections of the last president speaks against the current administration, as for its unilateral approach as its contempt againt the rest of the World. If the inspectors need 6 months, or 1 year, where's the problem? Under a constant monitoring SH is not able to develop WMD. So why would it be urgent to strike now, if WMD are the real concerns? Iraq has for the moment accepted conditions from the UN no country has ever accepted. Why would you the US people say if inspectors wanted to survey the WMD production in US, and ask for flights of spy splanes over the US territory ? Michael A. Barnhart wrote: Have we seriously talked via the UN to a joint group of Arab nations and let them from a coalition for a transitional government? Do you want that once again western nations make another government in a foreign country? It's the best way to fµck all up. Iraquis are the only ones to decide which government they want.


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Michael A Barnhart
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        KaЯl wrote: Why would you the US people say if inspectors wanted to survey the WMD production in US, and ask for flights of spy splanes over the US territory ? Following WW2 the US did propose open usage of spy planes by at least major nations. We were turned down. KaЯl wrote: Do you want that once again western nations make another government in a foreign country? Well I am clearly not phrasing myself well today. I thought that was what I was saying we should not do. I was just suggesting letting other Arab nations guide a new framework for the Iraq population. "I will find a new sig someday."

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Michael A Barnhart

          Chris, Once again you totaly discredit yourself by taking a partial sentance totaly out of context. Go read the whole thing. "I will find a new sig someday."

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Losinger
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          For agruments sake. *sentence fragment *missing apostrophe i'm not sure what to make of it. So you want no war and support Saddam giving chemical weapons to terrorist so they can be used against cities in the west. By your definition you a pro-peace. i think everyone here knows that KaRl is not pro-Saddam. and everyone knows that Saddam isn't giving weapons to (anti-US) terrorists. if giving money to any terrorist group is an invadable offense, we've got a long list of countries that need immediate invading. I do not think either of us believe that just an example that they are not equal labels. i have no idea how to parse that sentence. so, out of four (possible) sentences, only two make sense. if the other two are somehow relevant to the context of your post, then i'm sorry i'm unable to decipher them, as i'd love to know what you're talking about. perhaps we're in violent agreement - i can't tell. -c


          Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

          Fractals

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K KaRl

            _Ah _ok, sorry, I have totally missed your point.


            Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop__

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Michael A Barnhart
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            Let me say thanks for taking the time to reread it. I really appreciate the effort you do make in understanding others. We may not agree, but if we do not even understand what each other means it is hopeless to find what we do agree on. Or find a path to a resolution of our differences. Just think of the problems those in the UN must face on a daily basis. "I will find a new sig someday."

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              here's another fun one... Iraq and Iran are sworn enemies. so, a weaker Iraq boosts Iran's stature in the region. all of the pro-war-on-Iraq people must therefore be pro-Iran! -c


              Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

              Fractals

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Megan Forbes
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Chris Losinger wrote: all of the pro-war-on-Iraq people must therefore be pro-Iran! It really gets ridiculous doesn't it. I guess extremists are people who draw the line much further than the rest of us do :(


              Throw in a bit of S&M or eye-ball sucking**-Paul Watson on the merits of swearing, sex and obscenities in CP posts** ...they assumed that reasonably intelligent adults would know enough to leave the building if it was burning. Those who did not were, presumably, expendable, and there was less paperwork involved than trying to fire them**-Roger Wright on fire drills at work**

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Michael A Barnhart

                KaЯl wrote: Why would you the US people say if inspectors wanted to survey the WMD production in US, and ask for flights of spy splanes over the US territory ? Following WW2 the US did propose open usage of spy planes by at least major nations. We were turned down. KaЯl wrote: Do you want that once again western nations make another government in a foreign country? Well I am clearly not phrasing myself well today. I thought that was what I was saying we should not do. I was just suggesting letting other Arab nations guide a new framework for the Iraq population. "I will find a new sig someday."

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KaRl
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                Michael A. Barnhart wrote: Well I am clearly not phrasing myself well today My level of concentration is also very low this saturday :-O


                Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Losinger

                  here's another fun one... Iraq and Iran are sworn enemies. so, a weaker Iraq boosts Iran's stature in the region. all of the pro-war-on-Iraq people must therefore be pro-Iran! -c


                  Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                  Fractals

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tim Smith
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  Did you know Iran is siding with Iraq on this one? The thought of the US on Iran's border scares them worse than Iraq. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Tim Smith

                    Did you know Iran is siding with Iraq on this one? The thought of the US on Iran's border scares them worse than Iraq. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris Losinger
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    i hadn't heard this. i heard Iran wouldn't let the US use it's territory for bases or fly-overs, but that's not unusual. -c


                    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                    Fractals

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Losinger

                      i hadn't heard this. i heard Iran wouldn't let the US use it's territory for bases or fly-overs, but that's not unusual. -c


                      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                      Fractals

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tim Smith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      I don't remember the quote. But it was strange statement where they said something without really saying it. Was very odd. I wish I could find it now. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T Tim Smith

                        I don't remember the quote. But it was strange statement where they said something without really saying it. Was very odd. I wish I could find it now. Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Losinger
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        here's some nice Iran news: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030215-677323.htm[^] -c


                        Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. --Thomas Cardinal Wolsey

                        Fractals

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Le centriste

                          I kind of agree with that. The problem is that there is no proof of any kind of the presence of WMDs in Iraq. And USA is the one who wants to destroy another country, at the moment.

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          Gary Kirkham
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          The UN stated that Iraq had WMD back in 1998, when the weapons inspectors where thrown out of the country. Do you really believe that Iraq destroyed them? They had no reason to do that. No pressure was being applied. The thing that really blows, is that this should have been dealt with back in 1998. The Anti-War crowd is making a big deal about how great France and Germany are for their Anti-War position. I believe that France and Germany's biggest fear is that the world will find out how complicit they are in Iraq acquiring the capability to kill large numbers of people. Gary Kirkham A working Program is one that has only unobserved bugs I thought I wanted a career, turns out I just wanted paychecks

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Le centriste

                            ... seems to make you automatically pro-Iraq. Is that american propaganda at work? http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-15feb2003-21.htm and other things like that comment on CP yesterday from a redneck freak.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris Austin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #40

                            I don't know Michel, I have had many heated discussions with neighbors and co-workers here about peace vs. war and yet have not been called pro-Saddam. I'd say that a vast majority of folks are smart enough understand the difference. I think this is more likely a case of the "squeaky wheel" getting the attention. "Veni, Vidi, Booyah!" - Ceasar

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Michael A Barnhart

                              Let me say thanks for taking the time to reread it. I really appreciate the effort you do make in understanding others. We may not agree, but if we do not even understand what each other means it is hopeless to find what we do agree on. Or find a path to a resolution of our differences. Just think of the problems those in the UN must face on a daily basis. "I will find a new sig someday."

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              KaRl
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #41

                              My pleasure :) I've been raised in the cult of reason and think it's always possible to reach an agrement between people of good will


                              Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Le centriste

                                ... seems to make you automatically pro-Iraq. Is that american propaganda at work? http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/nat/newsnat-15feb2003-21.htm and other things like that comment on CP yesterday from a redneck freak.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                Its interesting the establishment that is most strongly agains Saddam is the establishment that strengthened and supported him in using chemical weapons against civilians in Iran....... So even if Saddam goes the same short sighted attitudes will put someone similar in power there or somewhere else. Depressing. The tigress is here :-D

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                  Nitron wrote: Think of ist as a necessary evil, kinda like going to the dentist. Yes, but what if the dentist wants to pull a tooth out? And the tooth he's pulling is not the one which is aching? A lot of things can go wrong at the dentist.. :rolleyes: Also, before a dentist wants to pull a tooth out of my mouth, I'd really want to know why he wants to do that, and show me the root of the problem, so to speak. :) -- Ihre ganze Unterseite sind gehören uns.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Maximilien
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #43

                                  But the dentist as a responsible specialist should have warned you that prevention is better and more cost effective than letting a bad tooth go worse and pull it out! Imagine having brushed and flossed all those years instead of eating candies, there wouldn't be any use for a dentist. Max.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Its interesting the establishment that is most strongly agains Saddam is the establishment that strengthened and supported him in using chemical weapons against civilians in Iran....... So even if Saddam goes the same short sighted attitudes will put someone similar in power there or somewhere else. Depressing. The tigress is here :-D

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    brianwelsch
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #44

                                    It's sort of useless to predict a nation's actions today based on things that happened decades ago. First, the face of the government is entirely different. Second, the changes globally since that time make for a very different playing field. Who knows, maybe the UN will play a role where it helps people become self sufficient rather than simply hand out food and medicine. (this last is based on perception, i don't know everything the UN really does) BW "We get general information and specific information, but none of the specific information talks about time, place or methods or means..." - Tom Ridge - US Secretary of Homeland Security

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups