Visual Basic needs more credit
-
I has everything to do with being able to get full words onto the screen and not have to repeat them, there is no compiler benefit. There is a psychology difference in the mind of the programmer that is more acceptable to human error and overall costs less while getting to the result faster and cleaner then any language.
What you say are exactly the things I didn't bother pointing out in favor of using class methods, and against the with statement. But if you're not familiar with basic OO concepts, then there's no point discussing this any further.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
-
We don't spend time on bugs, we use Unidex.
Which nobody here appears to know, and on google turns up blank. Meaning the only reference to your coding is the lazy sample you gave us. P.S.: If you didn't find bugs, you didn't test enough.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
-
Unidex manages the problems, its a connectionless state, serialized, time stamped, with automatic collision detection, that produces a daily report of user errors. It even comes in a marshalled version with a web api for web services. 100% of SQL related errors and practices are gone.
Now you're sounding like advocating some religious sect. I mean, nobody here has ever heard of Unidex, witnessed it's superiority, or revels in the light of its magnificence. If it sounds too good to be true, it isn't.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
-
Now you're sounding like advocating some religious sect. I mean, nobody here has ever heard of Unidex, witnessed it's superiority, or revels in the light of its magnificence. If it sounds too good to be true, it isn't.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
I started writing Unidex in 2002 when I was trained on .net 1.1 by Microsoft. It's been in use by Realty Executives since 2007, I created the web API and services last year. Windows 8 apps are the first to showcase Unidex in a public forum. Except for the serialization process of Windows 8 all I had to do was copy the code into a portable library and the code works. You can see some primitive examples of Unidex software by looking up our facebook page, which hasn't been updated in a while, advertising is never something I have had to do to be successful.
-
Which nobody here appears to know, and on google turns up blank. Meaning the only reference to your coding is the lazy sample you gave us. P.S.: If you didn't find bugs, you didn't test enough.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
https://www.facebook.com/UnidexSoftware[^] I don't find bugs because the programming intelligence model is based on what errors happen.
-
What you say are exactly the things I didn't bother pointing out in favor of using class methods, and against the with statement. But if you're not familiar with basic OO concepts, then there's no point discussing this any further.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
I think you mean OOP object-orientated-programming. No I am only advocating for the use of full word camel cased variables because I have no experience in the field.