Vote 1 with for no reason
-
Hello, In my article ASP.NET Client and Server site state management[^] I was givan a vote 1 without any justification. I don't think this is fair. The person who did it has the following profile in CodeProject: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/Chairman[^]. I am not really sure this is a real profile. Would you please, check this. Thanks, Eduardo
-
Hello, In my article ASP.NET Client and Server site state management[^] I was givan a vote 1 without any justification. I don't think this is fair. The person who did it has the following profile in CodeProject: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/Chairman[^]. I am not really sure this is a real profile. Would you please, check this. Thanks, Eduardo
Do not take it too hard! There are people that can not be controlled...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
-
Do not take it too hard! There are people that can not be controlled...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
Hello, I agree with you. Still, I think it's unfair that people are allowed to judge your work poorly without justifying it. As you can see in this forum, I had similar troubles in other articles, but the throller used really nasty language so it was easy to remove the vote. In this case, the throller was smarter, he or she voted the article badly putting no justification at all, making it harder to have his or her damage removed. Eduardo
-
Hello, I agree with you. Still, I think it's unfair that people are allowed to judge your work poorly without justifying it. As you can see in this forum, I had similar troubles in other articles, but the throller used really nasty language so it was easy to remove the vote. In this case, the throller was smarter, he or she voted the article badly putting no justification at all, making it harder to have his or her damage removed. Eduardo
Eduardo Antonio Cecilio Fernandes wrote:
making it harder to have his or her damage removed.
Oh. Not that smart...If he will do it consistently he and his comments will be removed, for sure!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
-
Eduardo Antonio Cecilio Fernandes wrote:
making it harder to have his or her damage removed.
Oh. Not that smart...If he will do it consistently he and his comments will be removed, for sure!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
I see :). Well, let's wait then!
-
Hello, I agree with you. Still, I think it's unfair that people are allowed to judge your work poorly without justifying it. As you can see in this forum, I had similar troubles in other articles, but the throller used really nasty language so it was easy to remove the vote. In this case, the throller was smarter, he or she voted the article badly putting no justification at all, making it harder to have his or her damage removed. Eduardo
Eduardo Antonio Cecilio Fernandes wrote:
e or she voted the article badly putting no justification at all
Are you sure about it? Did he/she write nothing? or just "as-ld nasldh" It should be no possible to vote one without a reason, and non-sense reasons can be taken as trolling, hence reportable. Edit: I already visited the article, the comments are gone
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Eduardo Antonio Cecilio Fernandes wrote:
e or she voted the article badly putting no justification at all
Are you sure about it? Did he/she write nothing? or just "as-ld nasldh" It should be no possible to vote one without a reason, and non-sense reasons can be taken as trolling, hence reportable. Edit: I already visited the article, the comments are gone
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Hello Nelek, The vote, however, is there :(. The article is still poorly voted. Regards, Eduardo
-
Hello Nelek, The vote, however, is there :(. The article is still poorly voted. Regards, Eduardo
Well, 4.67 is not a bad mark. Mine has less points (and is 5 years old), but hey, you know what? I don't care. If it helps someone and post a thanks or another kind of positive feedback or constructive comments. That is what really matters.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Well, 4.67 is not a bad mark. Mine has less points (and is 5 years old), but hey, you know what? I don't care. If it helps someone and post a thanks or another kind of positive feedback or constructive comments. That is what really matters.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
All right then :). Thank you guys for your time in this issue ;). Eduardo
