Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. DLL creation process in windows application with CEN XFS

DLL creation process in windows application with CEN XFS

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
sharepointcomhelp
17 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    venkat swaminathan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi To say i am very noob to windows programming world. We are trying to develop windows application + device driver with CEN XFS compliance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEN/XFS simple architectural flow:

       Windows Application
               |
      \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
     |      XFS APIs         |
        (CEN/XFS SDK DLL)
     |                       |
     |      XFS SPIs         |
     |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|---XFS Manager   
               |
               |
        Service providers (SP)
        (DEVICE DRIVER)
    

    To understand the SP's functionality, we recently took one of the device vendors SP's DLL for accessing their device and we were able to successfully communicate with their device using our windows application(Eclipse MINGW based). Then we started to check for some sample SP source in internet to try our implementation. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60pejPe6yiSejRGQ3JnLUl4dzA/view) With the linked source we were able to compile and create an output DLL. But , when we tried to access the SP, I always return error. With windows sample application, we just tried to open the device with call (WFSOPEN) which always returned (-15 WFS_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR ) or (-29 WFS_ERR_INVALID_SERVPROV)

    Trial FLow 1 :
        
        Application Call to manager:
            
            hResult = WFSOpen(    "QuantumT",    hApp,lpszAppID,  dwTraceLevel,dwTimeOut,VER\_SPI\_REQUIRE,&SrvcVersion,&SPIVersion,&hService);    
        
        manager translates WFSOPEN call to SP's WFPOPEN call:
            
            HRESULT WINAPI  WFPOpen(HSERVICE hService, LPSTR lpszLogicalName, HAPP hApp, LPSTR lpszAppID, DWORD dwTraceLevel, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID, HPROVIDER hProvider, DWORD dwSPIVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSPIVersion, DWORD dwSrvcVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSrvcVersion)
        
        With above call flow I get (-29 WFS\_ERR\_INVALID\_SERVPROV) as an error for my application
    

    Trial FLow 2 (Just removed WINAPI interface for WFPOPEN in SP):

    Application Call to manager:

    hResult = WFSOpen("QuantumT",hApp,lpszAppID,dwTraceLevel,dwTimeOut,VER_SPI_REQUIRE,&SrvcVersion,&SPIVersion,&hService);

    manager translates WFSOPEN call to SP's WFPOPEN call

    HRESULT WFPOpen(HSERVICE hServi

    Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V venkat swaminathan

      Hi To say i am very noob to windows programming world. We are trying to develop windows application + device driver with CEN XFS compliance. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEN/XFS simple architectural flow:

         Windows Application
                 |
        \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
       |      XFS APIs         |
          (CEN/XFS SDK DLL)
       |                       |
       |      XFS SPIs         |
       |\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_|---XFS Manager   
                 |
                 |
          Service providers (SP)
          (DEVICE DRIVER)
      

      To understand the SP's functionality, we recently took one of the device vendors SP's DLL for accessing their device and we were able to successfully communicate with their device using our windows application(Eclipse MINGW based). Then we started to check for some sample SP source in internet to try our implementation. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60pejPe6yiSejRGQ3JnLUl4dzA/view) With the linked source we were able to compile and create an output DLL. But , when we tried to access the SP, I always return error. With windows sample application, we just tried to open the device with call (WFSOPEN) which always returned (-15 WFS_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR ) or (-29 WFS_ERR_INVALID_SERVPROV)

      Trial FLow 1 :
          
          Application Call to manager:
              
              hResult = WFSOpen(    "QuantumT",    hApp,lpszAppID,  dwTraceLevel,dwTimeOut,VER\_SPI\_REQUIRE,&SrvcVersion,&SPIVersion,&hService);    
          
          manager translates WFSOPEN call to SP's WFPOPEN call:
              
              HRESULT WINAPI  WFPOpen(HSERVICE hService, LPSTR lpszLogicalName, HAPP hApp, LPSTR lpszAppID, DWORD dwTraceLevel, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID, HPROVIDER hProvider, DWORD dwSPIVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSPIVersion, DWORD dwSrvcVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSrvcVersion)
          
          With above call flow I get (-29 WFS\_ERR\_INVALID\_SERVPROV) as an error for my application
      

      Trial FLow 2 (Just removed WINAPI interface for WFPOPEN in SP):

      Application Call to manager:

      hResult = WFSOpen("QuantumT",hApp,lpszAppID,dwTraceLevel,dwTimeOut,VER_SPI_REQUIRE,&SrvcVersion,&SPIVersion,&hService);

      manager translates WFSOPEN call to SP's WFPOPEN call

      HRESULT WFPOpen(HSERVICE hServi

      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
      Richard Andrew x64
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I googled the error message you mention and could not find it in the Windows API. It doesn't look like a Windows error message. I'm afraid the maker of the device might be the only one who could help you with this problem. EDIT: Perhaps this is a call stack corruption caused by removing the WINAPI definition. WINAPI simply means __stdcall which is the calling convention used by the Windows API.

      The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

      V 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

        I googled the error message you mention and could not find it in the Windows API. It doesn't look like a Windows error message. I'm afraid the maker of the device might be the only one who could help you with this problem. EDIT: Perhaps this is a call stack corruption caused by removing the WINAPI definition. WINAPI simply means __stdcall which is the calling convention used by the Windows API.

        The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

        V Offline
        V Offline
        venkat swaminathan
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        So, you suspect this might the issue with SP code which i am currently working with??.

        Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V venkat swaminathan

          So, you suspect this might the issue with SP code which i am currently working with??.

          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Well, since that is not a Windows error message, I can only assume it is specific to the library you are using.

          The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

            I googled the error message you mention and could not find it in the Windows API. It doesn't look like a Windows error message. I'm afraid the maker of the device might be the only one who could help you with this problem. EDIT: Perhaps this is a call stack corruption caused by removing the WINAPI definition. WINAPI simply means __stdcall which is the calling convention used by the Windows API.

            The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

            V Offline
            V Offline
            venkat swaminathan
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Also i see some difference in Sp's DLL which i created and actual working vendors DLL
            Difference noted using PE studio's exported sysmbols option
            DLL Created by ME:

            _WFPCancelAsyncRequest@8,-,1,-,-,.rdata:0x00001096
            _WFPClose@12,-,2,-,-,.rdata:0x00001005
            _WFPDeregister@20,-,3,-,-,.rdata:0x00001140
            _WFPExecute@24,-,4,-,-,.rdata:0x00001131
            _WFPGetInfo@24,-,5,-,-,.rdata:0x000010EB
            _WFPLock@16,-,6,-,-,.rdata:0x00001023
            _WFPOpen@52,-,7,-,-,.rdata:0x0000102D
            _WFPRegister@20,-,8,-,-,.rdata:0x00001073
            _WFPSetTraceLevel@8,-,9,-,-,.rdata:0x0000113B
            _WFPUnloadService@0,-,10,-,-,.rdata:0x0000100A
            _WFPUnlock@12,-,11,-,-,.rdata:0x00001082

            Vendor created DLL:

            WFPCancelAsyncRequest,-,1,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C450
            WFPClose,-,2,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C6E0
            WFPDeregister,-,3,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C7F0
            WFPExecute,-,4,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C970
            WFPGetInfo,-,5,-,-,.rdata:0x0000DFA0
            WFPLock,-,6,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E490
            WFPOpen,-,7,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C030
            WFPRegister,-,8,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E590
            WFPSetTraceLevel,-,9,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E710
            WFPUnloadService,-,10,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E770
            WFPUnlock,-,11,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E8F0

            What is the difference.Does export method differ??

            Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V venkat swaminathan

              Also i see some difference in Sp's DLL which i created and actual working vendors DLL
              Difference noted using PE studio's exported sysmbols option
              DLL Created by ME:

              _WFPCancelAsyncRequest@8,-,1,-,-,.rdata:0x00001096
              _WFPClose@12,-,2,-,-,.rdata:0x00001005
              _WFPDeregister@20,-,3,-,-,.rdata:0x00001140
              _WFPExecute@24,-,4,-,-,.rdata:0x00001131
              _WFPGetInfo@24,-,5,-,-,.rdata:0x000010EB
              _WFPLock@16,-,6,-,-,.rdata:0x00001023
              _WFPOpen@52,-,7,-,-,.rdata:0x0000102D
              _WFPRegister@20,-,8,-,-,.rdata:0x00001073
              _WFPSetTraceLevel@8,-,9,-,-,.rdata:0x0000113B
              _WFPUnloadService@0,-,10,-,-,.rdata:0x0000100A
              _WFPUnlock@12,-,11,-,-,.rdata:0x00001082

              Vendor created DLL:

              WFPCancelAsyncRequest,-,1,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C450
              WFPClose,-,2,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C6E0
              WFPDeregister,-,3,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C7F0
              WFPExecute,-,4,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C970
              WFPGetInfo,-,5,-,-,.rdata:0x0000DFA0
              WFPLock,-,6,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E490
              WFPOpen,-,7,-,-,.rdata:0x0000C030
              WFPRegister,-,8,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E590
              WFPSetTraceLevel,-,9,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E710
              WFPUnloadService,-,10,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E770
              WFPUnlock,-,11,-,-,.rdata:0x0000E8F0

              What is the difference.Does export method differ??

              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
              Richard Andrew x64
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              You've hit the nail on the head! The ones on the bottom are exported like so:

              extern "C"
              {
              // Functions
              }

              The ones on the top are exported in C++ fashion, with name mangling. Try exporting your functions as extern "C" .

              The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

              V 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                You've hit the nail on the head! The ones on the bottom are exported like so:

                extern "C"
                {
                // Functions
                }

                The ones on the top are exported in C++ fashion, with name mangling. Try exporting your functions as extern "C" .

                The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                V Offline
                V Offline
                venkat swaminathan
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Thanks your tip help me to start some invetigation.All these days we were with LINUX. Migrating to windows seems little difficult for me. Where should :

                extern "C"
                {

                }

                </pre>

                be added??

                Because SPITesh.H, the code has the expected tag...

                #ifdef __cplusplus
                extern "C" {
                #endif
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPCancelAsyncRequest(HSERVICE hService, REQUESTID RequestID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPClose(HSERVICE hService, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPDeregister(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwEventClass, HWND hWndReg, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPExecute(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwCommand, LPVOID lpCmdData, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPGetInfo(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwCategory, LPVOID lpQueryDetails, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPLock(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPOpen(HSERVICE hService, LPSTR lpszLogicalName, HAPP hApp, LPSTR lpszAppID, DWORD dwTraceLevel, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID, HPROVIDER hProvider, DWORD dwSPIVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSPIVersion, DWORD dwSrvcVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSrvcVersion);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPRegister(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwEventClass, HWND hWndReg, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPSetTraceLevel(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwTraceLevel);
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPUnloadService();
                SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPUnlock(HSERVICE hService, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                #ifdef __cplusplus
                };
                #endif

                Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V venkat swaminathan

                  Thanks your tip help me to start some invetigation.All these days we were with LINUX. Migrating to windows seems little difficult for me. Where should :

                  extern "C"
                  {

                  }

                  </pre>

                  be added??

                  Because SPITesh.H, the code has the expected tag...

                  #ifdef __cplusplus
                  extern "C" {
                  #endif
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPCancelAsyncRequest(HSERVICE hService, REQUESTID RequestID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPClose(HSERVICE hService, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPDeregister(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwEventClass, HWND hWndReg, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPExecute(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwCommand, LPVOID lpCmdData, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPGetInfo(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwCategory, LPVOID lpQueryDetails, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPLock(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPOpen(HSERVICE hService, LPSTR lpszLogicalName, HAPP hApp, LPSTR lpszAppID, DWORD dwTraceLevel, DWORD dwTimeOut, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID, HPROVIDER hProvider, DWORD dwSPIVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSPIVersion, DWORD dwSrvcVersionsRequired, LPWFSVERSION lpSrvcVersion);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPRegister(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwEventClass, HWND hWndReg, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPSetTraceLevel(HSERVICE hService, DWORD dwTraceLevel);
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPUnloadService();
                  SPITEST_API HRESULT WINAPI WFPUnlock(HSERVICE hService, HWND hWnd, REQUESTID ReqID);
                  #ifdef __cplusplus
                  };
                  #endif

                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  What you show inside SPITesh.H is the correct placement. Is that your file or the original vendor's file? In Visual Studio, when you compile the code as C++, it should automatically define __cplusplus . If it doesn't, then it might be that your source file extension is ".c" when it should be ".cpp".

                  The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                    What you show inside SPITesh.H is the correct placement. Is that your file or the original vendor's file? In Visual Studio, when you compile the code as C++, it should automatically define __cplusplus . If it doesn't, then it might be that your source file extension is ".c" when it should be ".cpp".

                    The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                    V Offline
                    V Offline
                    venkat swaminathan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Yes, I sm trying to follow the same. but still it is doing no good. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60pejPe6yiSejRGQ3JnLUl4dzA/view[^] The link contains the project ref files i made sure all files are CPP and Extern C just for the headers. What else should i look ifor?? is there some settings that i should set in VS 2010 Express

                    Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V venkat swaminathan

                      Yes, I sm trying to follow the same. but still it is doing no good. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B60pejPe6yiSejRGQ3JnLUl4dzA/view[^] The link contains the project ref files i made sure all files are CPP and Extern C just for the headers. What else should i look ifor?? is there some settings that i should set in VS 2010 Express

                      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                      Richard Andrew x64
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Try placing the

                      #ifdef __cplusplus
                      extern "C" {
                      #endif
                      // Functions
                      #ifdef __cplusplus
                      };
                      #endif

                      in the CPP file also, surrounding the functions you want to export. I think that is the issue.

                      The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                      V 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                        Try placing the

                        #ifdef __cplusplus
                        extern "C" {
                        #endif
                        // Functions
                        #ifdef __cplusplus
                        };
                        #endif

                        in the CPP file also, surrounding the functions you want to export. I think that is the issue.

                        The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                        V Offline
                        V Offline
                        venkat swaminathan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        NO luck still.... :(

                        Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                          Try placing the

                          #ifdef __cplusplus
                          extern "C" {
                          #endif
                          // Functions
                          #ifdef __cplusplus
                          };
                          #endif

                          in the CPP file also, surrounding the functions you want to export. I think that is the issue.

                          The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          venkat swaminathan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          If possible can you just try downloading the code and check with your MS VS version??

                          Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • V venkat swaminathan

                            NO luck still.... :(

                            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                            Richard Andrew x64
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            I'm sorry. Maybe someone else will have some better ideas. :sigh:

                            The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • V venkat swaminathan

                              If possible can you just try downloading the code and check with your MS VS version??

                              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                              Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                              Richard Andrew x64
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              I did. It won't compile because of a number of undefined symbols in SpiTest.cpp.

                              Quote:

                              2 IntelliSense: cannot open source file "xfsconf.h" d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 7 1 spi_QuantumT_bcr 3 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMOpenKey" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 150 13 spi_QuantumT_bcr 4 IntelliSense: identifier "WFS_CFG_MACHINE_XFS_ROOT" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 150 24 spi_QuantumT_bcr 5 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMQueryValue" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 154 8 spi_QuantumT_bcr 6 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMCloseKey" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 161 2 spi_QuantumT_bcr

                              The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                              V 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                                I did. It won't compile because of a number of undefined symbols in SpiTest.cpp.

                                Quote:

                                2 IntelliSense: cannot open source file "xfsconf.h" d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 7 1 spi_QuantumT_bcr 3 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMOpenKey" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 150 13 spi_QuantumT_bcr 4 IntelliSense: identifier "WFS_CFG_MACHINE_XFS_ROOT" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 150 24 spi_QuantumT_bcr 5 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMQueryValue" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 154 8 spi_QuantumT_bcr 6 IntelliSense: identifier "WFMCloseKey" is undefined d:\Richard\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Projects\spi_QuantumT_bcr\spi_QuantumT_bcr\SpiTest.cpp 161 2 spi_QuantumT_bcr

                                The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                                V Offline
                                V Offline
                                venkat swaminathan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                XFSMANAGER INSTALLER: ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CEN/WhatWeDo/Fields/ICT/eBusiness/WS/XFS/CWA15748/XFS310SDKInstall.zip

                                That is the libray link.

                                Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • V venkat swaminathan

                                  XFSMANAGER INSTALLER: ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CEN/WhatWeDo/Fields/ICT/eBusiness/WS/XFS/CWA15748/XFS310SDKInstall.zip

                                  That is the libray link.

                                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                                  Richard Andrew x64
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  I'm sorry, I'm not going to install anything on my development machine. Take a look at this article: extern "C"[^]

                                  The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                                    I'm sorry, I'm not going to install anything on my development machine. Take a look at this article: extern "C"[^]

                                    The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    venkat swaminathan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    No problem , I will try some option too...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups