Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. scaling

scaling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
6 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    thewazz
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    https://medium.com/message/how-paper-magazines-web-engineers-scaled-kim-kardashians-back-end-sfw-6367f8d37688[^] not too deep but interesting.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T thewazz

      https://medium.com/message/how-paper-magazines-web-engineers-scaled-kim-kardashians-back-end-sfw-6367f8d37688[^] not too deep but interesting.

      P Offline
      P Offline
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      That looked OK until I got to the bottom.

      B T K 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        That looked OK until I got to the bottom.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Brisingr Aerowing
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        :rolleyes:

        What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? --- The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. --- Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P PIEBALDconsult

          That looked OK until I got to the bottom.

          T Offline
          T Offline
          thewazz
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          if we put our heads together we'll get to the bottom of this... :~

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            That looked OK until I got to the bottom.

            K Offline
            K Offline
            Kenneth Haugland
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Ah, I think I see your mistake. Try opening it in PhotoShop instead.

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kenneth Haugland

              Ah, I think I see your mistake. Try opening it in PhotoShop instead.

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              PhotoShop says, "you don't want to that; here's a picture of a kitten." :sigh:

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • World
              • Users
              • Groups