Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Cricket: India vs England - We Won! We Won!

Cricket: India vs England - We Won! We Won!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
visual-studiodata-structures
32 Posts 8 Posters 35 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Imran Farooqui

    Rama Krishna wrote: In that case we can ignore our match with Pak. Every team in the world make experiments before world cup by giving chance to new players and changing the order of senior players. Pakistan team is also making experiments these days because World cup is not too far, its in 2007.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rohit Sinha
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Oh, don't write them off just yet. They are one dangerous bunch of guys. The amount of commitment and determination they can show on the field when push comes to shove is unmatched by any one. Besides they still have two matches left to play and are still in the hunt for the super six. The match against Zimbabwe is almost over already, Pakistan is winning. :-D
    Regards,

    Rohit Sinha

    Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
    - Abraham Lincoln

    The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
    - Anonymous

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

      Rohit Sinha wrote: If you just wanted to run, you could do that. If you want to scare people with sticks, lots of people do that in the villags of India. If you wanted to cover yourself up in some shady gear, you could go to a fancy dress party. No no no no. It's about speed, strength, grace, the ability to think fast. It's... perfect! :) Rohit Sinha wrote: I give up. I couldn't hammer civilisation into the whole planet. I failed. :laugh: Rohit Sinha wrote: I must now go to sleep. It's 5am here. Same here, except that it's 1 am here. Good night Rohit. :) -- Uh huh. Yeah.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rohit Sinha
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: No no no no. It's about speed, strength, grace, the ability to think fast. It's... perfect! Looks like you are talking about Cricket. The only thing is, in Cricket you don't need to run from here to there like mad. Add style, technique and some adrenaline to the mix, take away any uncivilised madness, and you have a good game of Cricket there. ;P
      Regards,

      Rohit Sinha

      Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
      - Abraham Lincoln

      The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
      - Anonymous

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Imran Farooqui

        Rohit Sinha wrote: with Akhtar Express bowling from the other end, it's not going to be easy for the Indian batsmen With Akhtar's "express" bowling its going to be more easy for Indian batsmen to create Himalaya of runs. Rohit Sinha wrote: I hope they keep their cool and just somehow play his overs off If they follow this policy (like others including Aussies and England) then victory is guaranteed for you, though he has no other speciality except bowling fast. So your batsmen may take chance to beat him. Rohit Sinha wrote: Then there is Akram, another dangerous bowler. Yes, he is genuine threat for Indians as well as Muhammad Sami(if he play). Shoaib is constantly under stiff criticism by local media and there is a 40% chance that he will be dropped and Sami acting as a replacement.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rohit Sinha
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Imran Farooqui wrote: though he has no other speciality except bowling fast. That's enough to get all the Indian batsmen leaving the crease and running for their life. That's what happened in the match against Australia. He can easily break all their confidence and then they will be puppies in the hands of the other bowlers who can easily do them in. If each bowler plays his part well, they can get India out on a very low score. It is not necessary for one person to take the wickets. We don't want stars in the team. We want team players, with everyone doing his best to push the team forward. Hope the Indians play more sensibly this time.
        Regards,

        Rohit Sinha

        Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
        - Abraham Lincoln

        The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
        - Anonymous

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rohit Sinha

          Oh yeah! India 250/9 England 168 all out. :jig: Indiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, India! <> Indiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, India! <> Indiaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, India! <> :-D
          Regards,

          Rohit Sinha

          Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
          - Abraham Lincoln

          The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
          - Anonymous

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Watson
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Well done India! Have faith in your team Rohit, that is all they ask. Would like to meet India in the Super Sixes.

          Paul Watson
          Bluegrass
          Cape Town, South Africa

          Macbeth muttered: I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er Want a job?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rohit Sinha

            Kant wrote: Congratulations.... You too. :) Kant wrote: Poms plummeted by Nehra. Yeah, I couldn't believe my eyes. All the Indian bowlers were pretty good today. Hell, the whole Indian team was. Damn, they were looking a dangerous bunch. Was this a repeat of Lagaan? :cool:
            Regards,

            Rohit Sinha

            Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
            - Abraham Lincoln

            The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
            - Anonymous

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Senkwe Chanda
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Still, well done to India, it's not their problem that they won the toss, and they still had a job to do both with the bat and the ball regardless. ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

            R K 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • R Rohit Sinha

              Rama Krishna wrote: Best thing for us now will be:- Zim defeat Pak Eng defeat Aus That, unfortunately, is not likely to happen. Unless you predict it of course, and prepare one of those score cards of yours. :) We must defeat Pakistan. We will defeat Pakistan. Now the only thing left to be said is We have defeated Pakistan, but that'll have to wait for a few more days, till the 1st March. ;P Rama Krishna wrote: In that case we can ignore our match with Pak. If we do win with Pak we would like Eng to defeat Aus. OK, all these ifs and buts have left my head dizzy. I can't keep up with all the permutations and combinations any more. Without a pen and paper at least. So I'll ask you, instead of putting more strain on my feeble brain, since you seem to have a good command over what's happening and what should happen and when and how. Why would we like England to beat Australia if we beat Pakistan? Because we will have beaten both England and Pakistan, and lost to Australia, so what do we care who goes into the super six? Unless of course, we think we may not be able to repeat the performance with Pakistan if we play again. Rama Krishna wrote: Sachin is under good form so far but he has been successful too many times. I am tense that he may fail with Pak. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. :~ Seriously though, with Akhtar Express bowling from the other end, it's not going to be easy for the Indian batsmen. I hope they keep their cool and just somehow play his overs off. Then there is Akram, another dangerous bowler. Man, this is going to be some match. More fireworks than in Diwali. The two teams will be playing each other after three years.
              Regards,

              Rohit Sinha

              Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
              - Abraham Lincoln

              The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
              - Anonymous

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Rohit Sinha wrote: Seriously though, with Akhtar Express bowling from the other end, it's not going to be easy for the Indian batsmen. I hope they keep their cool and just somehow play his overs off. Then there is Akram, another dangerous bowler. Seriously though, there is Tendulkar the best in the world. On the other end, there is Sehwag, (the bowling killer). Next to come is Ganguly the master of tons and many others till number 8. Best bowlers Vs best batsmen contest is usually won by the batsmen. Because cricket is a game of batsmen. (Girls are more tilted towards great batsmen than great bowlers). And with the introduction of modern technology it is easy to work on the bowlers.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Rohit Sinha wrote: Seriously though, with Akhtar Express bowling from the other end, it's not going to be easy for the Indian batsmen. I hope they keep their cool and just somehow play his overs off. Then there is Akram, another dangerous bowler. Seriously though, there is Tendulkar the best in the world. On the other end, there is Sehwag, (the bowling killer). Next to come is Ganguly the master of tons and many others till number 8. Best bowlers Vs best batsmen contest is usually won by the batsmen. Because cricket is a game of batsmen. (Girls are more tilted towards great batsmen than great bowlers). And with the introduction of modern technology it is easy to work on the bowlers.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rohit Sinha
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Yeah OK. Just like in the match against Australia., The "best in the world", the "bowling killer", the "master of tons" and "many other till number 8" (hah! what a joke) could not do anything. What girls like rarely affects the outcome of a game of cricket. Unless they are playing, of course. While it is good to be patriotic (and you can bet your sweet ass I am much more patriotic that you, and more verbally so; and not just that, I show my patriotism though work, not just words, but that's beside the point), it does you no harm to acknowledge the good players on the other side. I never said our players will be able to do nothing. I just said that things are going to be difficult and challenging for them this time. Enjoy the match, buddy. Why get into arguments? Keep cricket out of pseudo nationalism will you? :rose:
                Regards,

                Rohit Sinha

                Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                - Abraham Lincoln

                The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                - Anonymous

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Senkwe Chanda

                  Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Still, well done to India, it's not their problem that they won the toss, and they still had a job to do both with the bat and the ball regardless. ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rohit Sinha
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Senkwe Chanda wrote: Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Yes, but remember that we got to bat first because we won the toss. Could have happened to both the teams. Besides, if you saw the match, you would have noticed that this time the Indians were playing very well, much much better than the recent matches. So I won't take any credit away from them. :) And BTW, do you know why batting under the lights is considered a disadvantage? Because this factor doesn't seem to be there in other venues? Are the lights not good? Or is it something else? The winds, and not the lights? Senkwe Chanda wrote: Still, well done to India, it's not their problem that they won the toss, and they still had a job to do both with the bat and the ball regardless. Yes, exactly.
                  Regards,

                  Rohit Sinha

                  Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                  - Abraham Lincoln

                  The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                  - Anonymous

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rohit Sinha

                    Senkwe Chanda wrote: Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Yes, but remember that we got to bat first because we won the toss. Could have happened to both the teams. Besides, if you saw the match, you would have noticed that this time the Indians were playing very well, much much better than the recent matches. So I won't take any credit away from them. :) And BTW, do you know why batting under the lights is considered a disadvantage? Because this factor doesn't seem to be there in other venues? Are the lights not good? Or is it something else? The winds, and not the lights? Senkwe Chanda wrote: Still, well done to India, it's not their problem that they won the toss, and they still had a job to do both with the bat and the ball regardless. Yes, exactly.
                    Regards,

                    Rohit Sinha

                    Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                    - Abraham Lincoln

                    The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                    - Anonymous

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Senkwe Chanda
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Rohit Sinha wrote: And BTW, do you know why batting under the lights is considered a disadvantage? Because this factor doesn't seem to be there in other venues? Are the lights not good? Or is it something else? The winds, and not the lights? :-) Hmm, well over the years I've watched many many day night games and I too never used to believe that the side batting under lights was at a disadvantage until the stats were placed in front of me. Invariably, if you win the toss for a day-nighter you bat first, no matter who you're playing. Sides that go against this are rare methinks. Batsmen always say you don't see as clearly under lights as you do during the day (which has to be true). Plus at night there is the dew factor to contend with as well. If there i any grass on the pitch, it tends to stand up at night. Also, for some wierd reason, the ball DOES move alot more at night. But seeing is believing for that one. I know England are struggling at the moment, but honestly, is the Indian bowling attack SO GOOD that the English guys kept on misjudging where their offstump was ball after ball after ball? Don't get me wrong, after the Aussies, the Indians are my favorite team. They also have my favorite player of all time in Sachin. But if they had batted second, I do believe they would have lost the game :-) ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rohit Sinha

                      Rama Krishna wrote: Best thing for us now will be:- Zim defeat Pak Eng defeat Aus That, unfortunately, is not likely to happen. Unless you predict it of course, and prepare one of those score cards of yours. :) We must defeat Pakistan. We will defeat Pakistan. Now the only thing left to be said is We have defeated Pakistan, but that'll have to wait for a few more days, till the 1st March. ;P Rama Krishna wrote: In that case we can ignore our match with Pak. If we do win with Pak we would like Eng to defeat Aus. OK, all these ifs and buts have left my head dizzy. I can't keep up with all the permutations and combinations any more. Without a pen and paper at least. So I'll ask you, instead of putting more strain on my feeble brain, since you seem to have a good command over what's happening and what should happen and when and how. Why would we like England to beat Australia if we beat Pakistan? Because we will have beaten both England and Pakistan, and lost to Australia, so what do we care who goes into the super six? Unless of course, we think we may not be able to repeat the performance with Pakistan if we play again. Rama Krishna wrote: Sachin is under good form so far but he has been successful too many times. I am tense that he may fail with Pak. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. :~ Seriously though, with Akhtar Express bowling from the other end, it's not going to be easy for the Indian batsmen. I hope they keep their cool and just somehow play his overs off. Then there is Akram, another dangerous bowler. Man, this is going to be some match. More fireworks than in Diwali. The two teams will be playing each other after three years.
                      Regards,

                      Rohit Sinha

                      Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                      - Abraham Lincoln

                      The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                      - Anonymous

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Senkwe Chanda
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      IMO there is no hope for Pakistan. India will crush them quite easily. They are just badly out of form except for Wasim Akram. Someone please tell Ul Haq and Waqar to retire. Also, someone please tell Ahktar that while we're impressed with his speed, we're not impressed with his misdirection. All a batsman needs to do against himn is get a nick and it goes for 4. I'm really dissapointed because this used to be the most graceful team to watch when they were in form. Beautiful batting. :( ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Senkwe Chanda

                        Rohit Sinha wrote: And BTW, do you know why batting under the lights is considered a disadvantage? Because this factor doesn't seem to be there in other venues? Are the lights not good? Or is it something else? The winds, and not the lights? :-) Hmm, well over the years I've watched many many day night games and I too never used to believe that the side batting under lights was at a disadvantage until the stats were placed in front of me. Invariably, if you win the toss for a day-nighter you bat first, no matter who you're playing. Sides that go against this are rare methinks. Batsmen always say you don't see as clearly under lights as you do during the day (which has to be true). Plus at night there is the dew factor to contend with as well. If there i any grass on the pitch, it tends to stand up at night. Also, for some wierd reason, the ball DOES move alot more at night. But seeing is believing for that one. I know England are struggling at the moment, but honestly, is the Indian bowling attack SO GOOD that the English guys kept on misjudging where their offstump was ball after ball after ball? Don't get me wrong, after the Aussies, the Indians are my favorite team. They also have my favorite player of all time in Sachin. But if they had batted second, I do believe they would have lost the game :-) ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rohit Sinha
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Senkwe Chanda wrote: Hmm, well over the years I've watched many many day night games and I too never used to believe that the side batting under lights was at a disadvantage until the stats were placed in front of me. No, I won't say I don't believe that the side batting second has a disadvantage. I just wanted to know why. Of course the light and the dew factor is there, but I was curious as to whether this time it was anything to do with the venue being Durban, with the wind and all coming into the picture. BTW, don't you think if it really is unfair to the side batting second, they should discontinue playing day-night matches? I think they should. IF it really is unfair to the team batting second that is. In all the matches. It takes the joy of winning away if someone so much as half mutters something like "But the lights..." ;) Senkwe Chanda wrote: I know England are struggling at the moment, but honestly, is the Indian bowling attack SO GOOD that the English guys kept on misjudging where their offstump was ball after ball after ball? Indians are a strange bunch. One day they'll indeed be really good, and quite bad another day. There is no telling what they'll do in any particular situation. And if you saw the match, you could have seen that the bowling was indeed good, not just a case of light and dew and what not. :) Senkwe Chanda wrote: But if they had batted second, I do believe they would have lost the game Quite possibly. But we won't know. Right now it's just speculation. Even if we have another match where India bats second, we can't say they'll be in the same frame of mind as this match, and the results might be different.
                        Regards,

                        Rohit Sinha

                        Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                        - Abraham Lincoln

                        The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                        - Anonymous

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Senkwe Chanda

                          Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Still, well done to India, it's not their problem that they won the toss, and they still had a job to do both with the bat and the ball regardless. ASP.NET can never fail as working with it is like fitting bras to supermodels - it's one pleasure after the next - David Wulff

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Kant
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Senkwe Chanda wrote: Yes but just remember that whoever won the toss was always going to win the match. It was a day-night game. I stick by my belief that batting at night is a huge disadvantage. Interesting article about it. Floodlights under the spotlight[^] Follow live World Cup Cricket scores here[^]

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups