NK jets intercept U.S. spy plane

Chris Losinger

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/03/03/spy_plane/index.html[^] "North Korean fighter jets intercepted a U.S. Air Force reconnaissance plane over the Sea of Japan and one used its radar in a manner that indicated it might attack, U.S. officials said Monday. " death to saddam. -c

When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

Bobber!

David Stone

Chris Losinger wrote: death to saddam. :laugh: Yeah, it's kinda stupid that we're going after Saddam when that idiot over in NK is threatening to nuke us all. (The fact that I live in San Diego, a naval city, and major target for nuclear attack has nothing to do with this...) I think we should just nuke North Korea and have done with it. I'm sorry if that offends anybody (Oh wait, I'm not) but I personally don't want to be blown up by some half pint idiot who's trying to bully his way into the global scene.

any idiot can write haiku you just stop at seventeenth syl -ThinkGeek Fortunes

Rutger Ellen

Actually I think that the -world- would find it a just cause if the us would take out N-Korea, at least a little more justifiable than attacking Iraq. Maybe only China would think otherwise. Rutger

Nic Rowan

Of course China would object. Probably a few other smaller countries as well and there would always be a few people sitting on the fence. But the question you have to ask is do you want to piss of NK and China while you are busy with Saddam and Osama? Sounds like a war on 3 or 4 fronts to me._

------------------------------------------ I beat the internet - the end guy is hard.

_

HENDRIK R

Nic Rowan wrote: But the question you have to ask is do you want to piss of NK and China while you are busy with Saddam and Osama? I think the question should be what to do about NK, and not what to do about Iraq. At the moment NK seems to be a far more danger for the whole world, espacially as we know that they're capable of producing mukes. And what about Bin Laden? As far as I see it there aren't that much efforts to catch him that would take thousands of soldiers. It's some elite troops, but they wouldn't lack in an attack on f.e. Iraq.

We are men. We are different. We have only one word for soap. We do not own candles. We have never seen anything of any value in a craft shop. We do not own magazines full of photographs of celebrities with their clothes on. - Steve

Mike Gaskey

Schlaubi wrote: And what about Bin Laden? As far as I see it there aren't that much efforts to catch him that would take thousands of soldiers. but getting much closer: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,80119,00.html[^] Mike

Lost User

But what does NK have that the US wants ? Lets be honest, all major countries are the same, squabbling over Iraqs oil. The tigress is here :-D

HENDRIK R

Mike Gaskey wrote: but getting much closer: Let's hope they're successful - especially when there're concerns about negative side-effects: Officials expressed concern that Al Qaeda cells could accelerate plots in the United States and elsewhere rather than run the risk of being captured. Or cell members might also go into hiding, believing their security was compromised by Mohammed's capture.

We are men. We are different. We have only one word for soap. We do not own candles. We have never seen anything of any value in a craft shop. We do not own magazines full of photographs of celebrities with their clothes on. - Steve

Rob Graham

After an appropriate "skills demonstartion" over Bahgdad, all we'll need for Kim-Il is a note saying "straighten up or you're next". :) Some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could have thought of them - George Orwell