Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. This mornings meeting

This mornings meeting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
28 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R R Giskard Reventlov

    Albert Holguin wrote:

    not sure if that's the norm in other countries

    I worked as a contractor in the UK for many years and all of my contracts had a notice period built in (usually a month). If they wanted me out they could ask me to leave the premises immediately but would be contractually obligated to pay out the notice period. Similarly, if I gave notice I would have to be content to turn up every day for a month, if required (I did do that once and they asked me to leave immediately but still paid me out. Took a couple of weeks off and brought forward the start date of the next gig - tally-ho!). As a perm employee there are more protections in place but, certainly, the notion of at-will employment does not, afaik, exist in the UK any more, if you have been employed for more than a year or two. (Others may correct, confirm or add detail to that).

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Albert Holguin
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    See that seems more fair to me... if one-side is bound by some obligation, the other side should be as well.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Albert Holguin

      See that seems more fair to me... if one-side is bound by some obligation, the other side should be as well.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      R Giskard Reventlov
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Indeed, plus there is also contractual reciprocity; what's good for the goose, etc. Courts in the UK take a dim view of one sided employment contracts.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Albert Holguin

        Mike Mullikin wrote:

        Its called not burning bridges.

        Thanks Capt. Obvious. I meant why it's such a one-sided deal.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Albert Holguin wrote:

        why it's such a one-sided deal.

        It's pretty obvious... :rolleyes: 1. Employees sometime quit with no notice. 2. Employers sometimes pay severance or even help with employment services. 3. The risks of sabotage by "fired" employees hanging around for a couple weeks is substantial.

        Contrary to popular belief, nobody owes you anything.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R R Giskard Reventlov

          Indeed, plus there is also contractual reciprocity; what's good for the goose, etc. Courts in the UK take a dim view of one sided employment contracts.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Albert Holguin
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Karel Čapek wrote:

          Courts in the UK take a dim view of one sided employment contracts

          In the US it seems to be the norm sadly.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Albert Holguin

            I'm not even sure why as American we always feel the need to give notice (not sure if that's the norm in other countries). If the company was laying you off, they'd give you no notice most of the time.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            I actually have had two jobs altogether and when I got laid off from the first job, they didn't give me a notice, but they paid me 2 weeks for each year I've had at that company plus the oustanding vacation, which was a nice lump sum (16 weeks or 4 months pay).

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              I actually have had two jobs altogether and when I got laid off from the first job, they didn't give me a notice, but they paid me 2 weeks for each year I've had at that company plus the oustanding vacation, which was a nice lump sum (16 weeks or 4 months pay).

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Albert Holguin
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Yeah, think that's pretty standard for salaried positions.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Albert Holguin

                Which part? Giving notice? ...does that apply to both parties (employee/employer)? ...because in the U.S. they'll just escort you out of the building the same day they told you a lot of times.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rage
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Yes, both. For instance, I have to notice two months before I leave, my employer has to notify me six months before throwing me out. A former colleague of mine worked in an American company based in Germany, and they had to cut off some staff, so did exactly what you described and escorted a bunch of employees, including her, out of the building on the day of the notice. They probably did not realize that the law was a bit different here ! The former employees sued the company and they got quite a lot of money from that action !

                Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rage

                  Yes, both. For instance, I have to notice two months before I leave, my employer has to notify me six months before throwing me out. A former colleague of mine worked in an American company based in Germany, and they had to cut off some staff, so did exactly what you described and escorted a bunch of employees, including her, out of the building on the day of the notice. They probably did not realize that the law was a bit different here ! The former employees sued the company and they got quite a lot of money from that action !

                  Do not escape reality : improve reality !

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Albert Holguin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  That's actually pretty good... I'd think you'd want to give employees plenty of notice to find another job. Think it's paranoia that makes American employers do that, they think you'd sabotage something.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups