Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. Learn you Func Prog on five minute quick!

Learn you Func Prog on five minute quick!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
functional
13 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Brisingr Aerowing

    :confused: and why did he write like that?

    What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

    K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    I assumed it was a joke about the way many functional languages order their syntax.

    TTFN - Kent

    L Sander RosselS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      I assumed it was a joke about the way many functional languages order their syntax.

      TTFN - Kent

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      Assumptions are the mother.. :laugh:

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Kent Sharkey

        The Register[^]:

        Functional Programming is the great paradigm shift that is sweeping through software development.

        Prepare yourself for the cutting edge!

        Especially for those who loved the "Programming Trends" item ;)

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dominic Burford
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        This article isn't actually about Functional Programming at all, it's a comical put down of the FP paradigm by someone that clearly doesn't understand it.

        "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

        Sander RosselS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Brisingr Aerowing

          :confused: and why did he write like that?

          What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dominic Burford
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          Because it's not a serious article, it's a comical put-down of the FP paradigm by someone who clearly doesn't understand it.

          "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Brisingr Aerowing

            :confused: and why did he write like that?

            What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism. Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rob Grainger
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            There is a series of articles on learning Haskell called "Learn You a Haskell for Great Good". I presumed he was riffing on that theme.

            "If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough." Alan Kay.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kent Sharkey

              I assumed it was a joke about the way many functional languages order their syntax.

              TTFN - Kent

              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander Rossel
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              To assume makes an ass of u and me :)

              Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

              Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

              Regards, Sander

              K 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dominic Burford

                This article isn't actually about Functional Programming at all, it's a comical put down of the FP paradigm by someone that clearly doesn't understand it.

                "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander Rossel
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                It's pretty funny though :laugh:

                Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                Regards, Sander

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                  It's pretty funny though :laugh:

                  Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                  Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                  Regards, Sander

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dominic Burford
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  It's certainly funny. They ought to write some CP articles. A few light-hearted articles might be a good idea :-D

                  "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Kent Sharkey

                    The Register[^]:

                    Functional Programming is the great paradigm shift that is sweeping through software development.

                    Prepare yourself for the cutting edge!

                    Especially for those who loved the "Programming Trends" item ;)

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Neely
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Quote:

                    "a monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors, what's the problem?"

                    :sigh:

                    Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                      To assume makes an ass of u and me :)

                      Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.

                      Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra

                      Regards, Sander

                      K Offline
                      K Offline
                      Kent Sharkey
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      Yeah, but I do that every day ;) First half anyway. The me part. I meant.

                      TTFN - Kent

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups