So... Trump Molested 2 Women...
-
SledgeHammer01 wrote:
Clinton has been proven innocent. Cleared of all charges
Incorrect, but don't let the truth get in the way of a biased argument.
SledgeHammer01 wrote:
Trump has not been cleared of anything
Which brings me full-circle to my first post. The important thing is that Trump has not been found guilty of anything yet you are posting as if he has. Trump is a rich and powerful man with many rich and powerful friends. The chances of him being prosecuted for misdemeanours are slim. It's not fair, but it's how the world works. Clinton is also very rich and powerful with many rich and powerful friends...but of course the reason she wasn't prosecuted is because she is completely innocent. Right?
She was investigated over the email server and it was determined that there was nothing prosecutable. Case closed. She's "innocent". Do I think she's 100% squeaky clean? No. No politician is. Hell, I think we'd be hard pressed to find ANYBODY that's 100% squeaky clean and never broken a law in their life. Do I think should she be in prison like Donald says she should be? After she gets convicted of something, sure. So now you'll point out that Donald wasn't convicted of anything either. Correct, he wasn't. Is there a ton of evidence that indicates he's a sociopath and a predator? Absolutely. I've "convicted" him of being a sociopath, not a rapist. Being a sociopath isn't a jailable offense, but it does disqualify you from being president imo. I've also "convicted" him of being extremely immature and erratic. That too disqualifies you from being president. Does that clear things up?
-
She was investigated over the email server and it was determined that there was nothing prosecutable. Case closed. She's "innocent". Do I think she's 100% squeaky clean? No. No politician is. Hell, I think we'd be hard pressed to find ANYBODY that's 100% squeaky clean and never broken a law in their life. Do I think should she be in prison like Donald says she should be? After she gets convicted of something, sure. So now you'll point out that Donald wasn't convicted of anything either. Correct, he wasn't. Is there a ton of evidence that indicates he's a sociopath and a predator? Absolutely. I've "convicted" him of being a sociopath, not a rapist. Being a sociopath isn't a jailable offense, but it does disqualify you from being president imo. I've also "convicted" him of being extremely immature and erratic. That too disqualifies you from being president. Does that clear things up?
SledgeHammer01 wrote:
She was investigated over the email server and it was determined that there was nothing prosecutable. Case closed. She's "innocent".
Again, incorrect. The FBI stated there was evidence that the law was probably broken, however the decision was taken not to prosecute. That's the reality...the FBI think "She's guilty but we'll never get a conviction so won't waste our time". The way you are framing it (that she was "cleared" and "innocent") is that she was charged, went to court and successfully argued she was not guilty. If the police see you going 5mph over the limit but decide to not pull you over and ticket you, does that mean you have not broken the law? No, it means you were let off.