Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Metaprogramming as opposed to Agile

Metaprogramming as opposed to Agile

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcombusinesscollaboration
14 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Andersson

    No, not this Metaprogramming[^] I'm referring to this metaprogramming[^] Be sure to read the comments as well. Not sure what I wanted to convey with this, but he has a point, successful programs products usually starts small with a visionary in the lead, rather than run by a management team.

    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

    U Offline
    U Offline
    Uwe Laas
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Very, very interisting ... gives me hope for our little 5 person startup (2 people responsible for the product) - many people told us it would be impossible.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Uwe Laas

      Very, very interisting ... gives me hope for our little 5 person startup (2 people responsible for the product) - many people told us it would be impossible.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jorgen Andersson
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Almost anything is possible if the scope doesn't keep changing, you know what you want and you're competent enough.

      Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        An interesting if nostalgic article. The comments are very revealing including those about Dave Cutler Dave Cutler - Wikipedia[^] . I found the link to the history of Xenix Xenix - Wikipedia[^] fascinating. The author could have mentioned Wayne Ratliff - Wikipedia[^] of dBase fame and Briklin and Frankston who created VisiCalc VisiCalc - Wikipedia[^] . While I do agree with Marc Clifton's comments this article reminds us of a time where great steps forward were achieved by single individuals with a vision. Narcissists maybe but clever and motivated also. Ever since then I have had great respect for the adage "If it takes 1 programmer 1 year it will take 100 programmers 100 years".

        Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Andersson
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        pwasser wrote:

        "If it takes 1 programmer 1 year it will take 100 programmers 100 years".

        I've heard the version with nine women and a baby.

        Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Marc Clifton

          Very few coders would I give the title "programmer". Of those, even fewer, "software engineer" Of those, even fewer, "metaprogrammer" That said, the kind of successful programs that he's talking about in the article (Turbo Pascal, CP/M, QDOS, WordStar, MSWord, Lotus123) well, most of those are archaic, and even the origins of MSWord and Lotus are archaic in their 1.0 versions. It was also a very different time. Come on, Turbo Pascal had a text-based IDE with special text characters to draw the frames. Nowadays, a successful product requires a small village with several visionaries -- back-end, front-end, security, customer support, social media marketing, cross-platform / mobile, etc. It's not the same game anymore. [edit]Oh, and a lot of those characters he mentions as metaprogrammers are also narcissistic egomaniacs. ;) [/edit] Marc

          V.A.P.O.R.ware - Visual Assisted Programming / Organizational Representation Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jorgen Andersson
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Marc Clifton wrote:

          Oh, and a lot of those characters he mentions as metaprogrammers are also narcissistic egomaniacs

          You can still get a long way being a narcissistic egomaniac. Just think Apple. :)

          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Very few coders would I give the title "programmer". Of those, even fewer, "software engineer" Of those, even fewer, "metaprogrammer" That said, the kind of successful programs that he's talking about in the article (Turbo Pascal, CP/M, QDOS, WordStar, MSWord, Lotus123) well, most of those are archaic, and even the origins of MSWord and Lotus are archaic in their 1.0 versions. It was also a very different time. Come on, Turbo Pascal had a text-based IDE with special text characters to draw the frames. Nowadays, a successful product requires a small village with several visionaries -- back-end, front-end, security, customer support, social media marketing, cross-platform / mobile, etc. It's not the same game anymore. [edit]Oh, and a lot of those characters he mentions as metaprogrammers are also narcissistic egomaniacs. ;) [/edit] Marc

            V.A.P.O.R.ware - Visual Assisted Programming / Organizational Representation Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete OHanlon
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Marc Clifton wrote:

            a lot of those characters he mentions as metaprogrammers are also narcissistic egomaniacs.

            Oh, I'm in the list. Cool.:cool:

            This space for rent

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Pete OHanlon

              Marc Clifton wrote:

              a lot of those characters he mentions as metaprogrammers are also narcissistic egomaniacs.

              Oh, I'm in the list. Cool.:cool:

              This space for rent

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mark_Wallace
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

              Oh, I'm in the list. Cool

              But I'm higher on it, of course.

              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F F ES Sitecore

                Quote:

                Over the history of personal computing, it seems that the best software was written by a team of five or fewer programmers. CP/M, the first PC operating system was built by one guy, Gary Kildall, though he got parts from others such as Gordon Eubanks. MSDOS originated in QDOS, again written by one person, Tim Paterson.

                In history your house had probably been built by your granddad on his own. I fail to see the point.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                F-ES Sitecore wrote:

                I fail to see the point.

                What if it now took a team of 20 to build the house and it never gets finished?

                Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mark_Wallace

                  Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                  Oh, I'm in the list. Cool

                  But I'm higher on it, of course.

                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  den2k88
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  You can be high on what you want, we don't judge.

                  CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game. I'm a puny punmaker.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    F-ES Sitecore wrote:

                    I fail to see the point.

                    What if it now took a team of 20 to build the house and it never gets finished?

                    Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

                    F Offline
                    F Offline
                    F ES Sitecore
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    But if it *does* get finished it's going to be an awesome house, unlike your ancestor's rickety old shack.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      An interesting if nostalgic article. The comments are very revealing including those about Dave Cutler Dave Cutler - Wikipedia[^] . I found the link to the history of Xenix Xenix - Wikipedia[^] fascinating. The author could have mentioned Wayne Ratliff - Wikipedia[^] of dBase fame and Briklin and Frankston who created VisiCalc VisiCalc - Wikipedia[^] . While I do agree with Marc Clifton's comments this article reminds us of a time where great steps forward were achieved by single individuals with a vision. Narcissists maybe but clever and motivated also. Ever since then I have had great respect for the adage "If it takes 1 programmer 1 year it will take 100 programmers 100 years".

                      Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mark_Wallace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      pwasser wrote:

                      "If it takes 1 programmer 1 year it will take 100 programmers 100 years"

                      And eighty programmers with twenty managers 1,000 years.

                      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups