Grammarly
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
I don't see what's wrong with it? Was it supposed to be future tense or something?
Jeremy Falcon
-
I don't see what's wrong with it? Was it supposed to be future tense or something?
Jeremy Falcon
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with it?
I'm saying that my vocabulary is not that impressive yet it's still better than 85% of users. :-D
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with it?
I'm saying that my vocabulary is not that impressive yet it's still better than 85% of users. :-D
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Ah, totally missed the joke then. :doh:
Jeremy Falcon
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
MAYBE YOU'VE TYPED IN ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font? :D
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Why would we?
-
MAYBE YOU'VE TYPED IN ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font? :D
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
Sander Rossel wrote:
ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font?
Those count towards grammar? :omg: :omg: Actually, the way our educational system is going you might be on to something. :-\
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Why would we?
-
Sander Rossel wrote:
ALL CAPS or used a slightly bigger font?
Those count towards grammar? :omg: :omg: Actually, the way our educational system is going you might be on to something. :-\
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
RyanDev wrote:
Those count towards grammar?
No, they only count to a LARGER vocabulary ;)
Best, Sander arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript SQL Server for C# Developers Succinctly Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Might be that educated people don't need it? Just a thought.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Got the same result... english isn't even my first language.... On that note, I have the german vocabulary of a 7 year old... a retarded 7 year old. Oh the iron E
-
Ah, totally missed the joke then. :doh:
Jeremy Falcon
was there a joke? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Got the same result... english isn't even my first language.... On that note, I have the german vocabulary of a 7 year old... a retarded 7 year old. Oh the iron E
-
Might be that educated people don't need it? Just a thought.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Probably. I installed the free version. It is quite interesting. I like how the product works.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
You have a larger vocabulary than 85% of Grammarly users.
Clearly not many educated people are using it. :laugh: :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Unless things have changed in the past 6-9 months, not many educated people are writing it either. We have someone who runs press releases through it before distribution to catch errors and it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse! Best case it entirely misses blatant errors. In the end we hired a proof reader with a brain. :sigh:
-
Unless things have changed in the past 6-9 months, not many educated people are writing it either. We have someone who runs press releases through it before distribution to catch errors and it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse! Best case it entirely misses blatant errors. In the end we hired a proof reader with a brain. :sigh:
RJOberg wrote:
it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse!
I believe it. I've had it do it to me as well. Of course I assumed I must be wrong because I don't pretend to be a grammar genius. That is funny you saw that as well. :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
RJOberg wrote:
it actually suggests changes that make the grammar worse!
I believe it. I've had it do it to me as well. Of course I assumed I must be wrong because I don't pretend to be a grammar genius. That is funny you saw that as well. :laugh:
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
I feel like developing spelling/grammar checks are two tasks that should never be outsourced. All localization should be handled by a team of native speakers lead by a primary school teacher of said language. Preferably one who isn't afraid to use a ruler like a Catholic school nun. :-D
