Department of Redundancy Department
-
Impossible as it is VisualBasic (I put it in C only to not hurt anyone sensibility) and not .NET (yes, tried and true VB6, that's what I have to work with) so it is a Boolean that can be only True or False and it is initialized to False. If there was such a possibility I would have kept the code as it was, of course.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
That goes to show that you just can't win; and not just because you're working in VB6. :doh:
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
Someone get this man a beer.
cheers Chris Maunder
"Beer, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems."
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt
-
It's not, and I know precisely what I could have used :D I was probably just tired or distracted by my many other tasks.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
- Or you had more code inside the if... - Or you extract the Method...
Paulo Gomes Measuring programming progress by lines of code is like measuring aircraft building progress by weight. —Bill Gates Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. —Albert Einstein
-
AKA I found out that yeasterday I wrote a code like this
if (blnVariable == true) {
setVal(CODE, true);
} else {
setVal(CODE, false);
}Luckily I got it before someone could shame me forever about it (including myself).
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I found this bit of code a few days ago:- :confused: __builtin_write_OSCCONL((uint8) (0x0200 & 0x00FF));
-
I found this bit of code a few days ago:- :confused: __builtin_write_OSCCONL((uint8) (0x0200 & 0x00FF));
-
AKA I found out that yeasterday I wrote a code like this
if (blnVariable == true) {
setVal(CODE, true);
} else {
setVal(CODE, false);
}Luckily I got it before someone could shame me forever about it (including myself).
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
den2k88 wrote:
AKA I found out that yeasterday I wrote a code like this
"Yeasterday" -- is that when some planet is rising? ;P I found myself trying to type C# source into an Xcode Swift editor yesterday. Preoccupation is the nature of our work, I think. alan
-
AKA I found out that yeasterday I wrote a code like this
if (blnVariable == true) {
setVal(CODE, true);
} else {
setVal(CODE, false);
}Luckily I got it before someone could shame me forever about it (including myself).
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
Please tell me you did not fix it by introducing a method to handle it! :) :) :)