WPF DataGrid uses a lot of memory, or is slow to scroll
-
Thanks, that's very helpful. :)
You're welcome.
This space for rent
-
Thanks. I might well use that approach, depending on how much progress I make. Currently I am implementing a solution whereby the grid is read only but when the user double clicks on a cell, it becomes editable. So instead of plain text, they now see a combo box, or a tick box, or a numeric value editor. Double click elsewhere, and the cell becomes read only. This works well with the Microsoft WPF DataGrid though the memory usage is still rather high. The non editable cell control is a Label. I am also looking at the WPF Table View control on CodePlex. As yet I cannot find out how to make the current cell active when double clicked on, but the memory usage and speed are better. Clearly I can easily pop up a dialog to edit a cell, or a row as you suggest since I can trap the mouse double click. From searching around it does seem that the performance of grids is a widespread problem.
That design would drive nuts, double click to edit a single cell, double click to end editing, rinse and repeat. Plus you have horizontal scroll so you cannot see the entire row of data. I use the dialog style because the user can double click on a row and see and edit the entire set of data. The users often double click the row just to view the data. I have a rule that no more than 2 fields may be edited in a grid and absolutely no controls other than a textblock/box are to be used in a grid.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
That design would drive nuts, double click to edit a single cell, double click to end editing, rinse and repeat. Plus you have horizontal scroll so you cannot see the entire row of data. I use the dialog style because the user can double click on a row and see and edit the entire set of data. The users often double click the row just to view the data. I have a rule that no more than 2 fields may be edited in a grid and absolutely no controls other than a textblock/box are to be used in a grid.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
I agree. However, this is an application for engineers rather than general consumers, and this particular view displays configuration settings that will only be examined by two or three people who are based in our company (super users). The values are rather abstruse, and control fine details of a display device. Most of the time users will just examine the values, and maybe tweak one or two. For general editing we stream the data to and from a .CSV file. So in practice this horrible view will be okay.
-
I agree. However, this is an application for engineers rather than general consumers, and this particular view displays configuration settings that will only be examined by two or three people who are based in our company (super users). The values are rather abstruse, and control fine details of a display device. Most of the time users will just examine the values, and maybe tweak one or two. For general editing we stream the data to and from a .CSV file. So in practice this horrible view will be okay.
Leif Simon Goodwin wrote:
this is an application for engineers
You don't like your engineers!!! Sorry but that is no excuse for a lousy design.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I agree. However, this is an application for engineers rather than general consumers, and this particular view displays configuration settings that will only be examined by two or three people who are based in our company (super users). The values are rather abstruse, and control fine details of a display device. Most of the time users will just examine the values, and maybe tweak one or two. For general editing we stream the data to and from a .CSV file. So in practice this horrible view will be okay.
I get the impression you don't "understand" the purpose of these "configuration settings"; and because there are "a lot of them", a "grid" should do the trick. Have you "talked" to the "engineers"? WPF has the ability to "expand" "details" of a selected row. One can have a list view of "grids"; etc. What's missing is a UI "visual" designer; who's familiar with WPF (or not at all) ... oh, and familiar with the problem domain.
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then". ― Blaise Pascal
-
Leif Simon Goodwin wrote:
this is an application for engineers
You don't like your engineers!!! Sorry but that is no excuse for a lousy design.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
This is the design requested by the engineers including the technical director. It's the one they use in the current application (which the new one replaces).
-
Leif Simon Goodwin wrote:
this is an application for engineers
You don't like your engineers!!! Sorry but that is no excuse for a lousy design.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
This is the design requested by the firmware engineers including the technical director, and does all that they need. They have the same layout in the current application, which the new one replaces.
-
This is the design requested by the firmware engineers including the technical director, and does all that they need. They have the same layout in the current application, which the new one replaces.
Could you put up a mocked up screenshot so that we can get a better idea of what you're after?
This space for rent
-
I get the impression you don't "understand" the purpose of these "configuration settings"; and because there are "a lot of them", a "grid" should do the trick. Have you "talked" to the "engineers"? WPF has the ability to "expand" "details" of a selected row. One can have a list view of "grids"; etc. What's missing is a UI "visual" designer; who's familiar with WPF (or not at all) ... oh, and familiar with the problem domain.
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then". ― Blaise Pascal
Are you always so completely obnoxious? :mad: You come across as a troll. Every single one of your posts is a put down. The suggestions you make are vague abstract comments (the kind that someone with no real knowledge could make), with no helpful content and nothing to indicate any actual technical knowledge on your part. Do you have anything constructive to say or is your goal simply to piss on me? Frankly I am getting pissed off with your obnoxious trolling. :mad: The layout was designed by the engineers. It's what they have asked for and what they want. They've seen the current prototype and like it. It's the same as in the previous application which has served them well.
-
Could you put up a mocked up screenshot so that we can get a better idea of what you're after?
This space for rent
Probably not for reasons of commercial secrecy. What I am working on has NDA agreements in place. However, the current implementation now works well. We generate and compile the form code on the fly, and the form runs pretty quickly to provide a decent user experience. I am using the extended WPF toolkit DataGrid in place of the standard DataGrid which has solved the performance issues. From searching on the internet, it's clear that the performance of data grids is an issue for a lot of people, and I am sure many have their own custom implementations. I might be able to significantly reduce the memory footprint, and increase execution time but it would require significant development time which we do not have. We need to focus on the features that our customers will use, rather than gold plate something used from time to time by a couple of our own engineers.
-
Could you put up a mocked up screenshot so that we can get a better idea of what you're after?
This space for rent
I accidentally marked your post as trolling. Apologies for the error, your posts are constructive. :sigh:
-
I accidentally marked your post as trolling. Apologies for the error, your posts are constructive. :sigh:
Don't worry about it. I have the feeling you're going to have to drop back to dotTrace to trace the performance of what's going on.
This space for rent
-
Are you always so completely obnoxious? :mad: You come across as a troll. Every single one of your posts is a put down. The suggestions you make are vague abstract comments (the kind that someone with no real knowledge could make), with no helpful content and nothing to indicate any actual technical knowledge on your part. Do you have anything constructive to say or is your goal simply to piss on me? Frankly I am getting pissed off with your obnoxious trolling. :mad: The layout was designed by the engineers. It's what they have asked for and what they want. They've seen the current prototype and like it. It's the same as in the previous application which has served them well.
You talk in abstracts. You're looking for advice, but won't accept any in terms of being more clear about the "use case". Whatever the "layout" the engineers decided, it's only known to you apparently. It's simple: you don't understand "virtualization" and refuse to. (Later: I get it now why you were being so obtuse... it was because of the "NDA"; you should have made that clear from the beginning; then I wouldn't have bothered trying to help).
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then". ― Blaise Pascal
-
You talk in abstracts. You're looking for advice, but won't accept any in terms of being more clear about the "use case". Whatever the "layout" the engineers decided, it's only known to you apparently. It's simple: you don't understand "virtualization" and refuse to. (Later: I get it now why you were being so obtuse... it was because of the "NDA"; you should have made that clear from the beginning; then I wouldn't have bothered trying to help).
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then". ― Blaise Pascal
Get lost. :mad: