Here Trump having no clue
-
[Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Trade negotiators have just returned from China where the meetings on Trade were very productive. Now at meetings with me at Mar-a-Lago giving the details. In the meantime, Billions of Dollars are being paid to the United](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1096926633708134406) China is probably losing billions because of the tariffs, but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China.
-
[Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Trade negotiators have just returned from China where the meetings on Trade were very productive. Now at meetings with me at Mar-a-Lago giving the details. In the meantime, Billions of Dollars are being paid to the United](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1096926633708134406) China is probably losing billions because of the tariffs, but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China.
Very Large Brain wrote:
but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China
Which also doesn't include the lost sales due to higher priced products either.
Very Large Brain wrote:
Here Trump having no clue
I haven't seen any evidence that he is smart enough to understand anything.
-
Very Large Brain wrote:
but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China
Which also doesn't include the lost sales due to higher priced products either.
Very Large Brain wrote:
Here Trump having no clue
I haven't seen any evidence that he is smart enough to understand anything.
jschell wrote:
I haven't seen any evidence that he is smart enough to understand anything
His supporters probably don't show any evidence of this either.
-
jschell wrote:
I haven't seen any evidence that he is smart enough to understand anything
His supporters probably don't show any evidence of this either.
-
[Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Trade negotiators have just returned from China where the meetings on Trade were very productive. Now at meetings with me at Mar-a-Lago giving the details. In the meantime, Billions of Dollars are being paid to the United](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1096926633708134406) China is probably losing billions because of the tariffs, but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China.
By how much did your taxes go up, and what percentage of it is now used to pay those tarifs?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
By how much did your taxes go up, and what percentage of it is now used to pay those tarifs?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
What is your point here? Trying to make me believe that China is actually writing a check to the US for the tariffs?
-
[Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "Trade negotiators have just returned from China where the meetings on Trade were very productive. Now at meetings with me at Mar-a-Lago giving the details. In the meantime, Billions of Dollars are being paid to the United](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1096926633708134406) China is probably losing billions because of the tariffs, but the ones actually paying billions to the US are the American taxpayers, not China.
-
jschell wrote:
I haven't seen any evidence that he is smart enough to understand anything
His supporters probably don't show any evidence of this either.
In the interest of fairness: Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back" from the hundreds of millions of dollars given as bonus to Wall Street executives for their roles in the multi-billion dollar rescue of Bear Sterns, etc, which used tax-payer money and the investors didn't have to risk a penny?
-
In the interest of fairness: Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back" from the hundreds of millions of dollars given as bonus to Wall Street executives for their roles in the multi-billion dollar rescue of Bear Sterns, etc, which used tax-payer money and the investors didn't have to risk a penny?
He has no fucking clue what you are talking about.
-
In the interest of fairness: Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back" from the hundreds of millions of dollars given as bonus to Wall Street executives for their roles in the multi-billion dollar rescue of Bear Sterns, etc, which used tax-payer money and the investors didn't have to risk a penny?
Vivic wrote:
Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back
I don't know. How much?
-
Vivic wrote:
Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back
I don't know. How much?
Zero. Zip. Nil. Nada. Nul.
-
Zero. Zip. Nil. Nada. Nul.
That is highly probable. In fact, I would have been fucking pissed as an American taxpayer having my tax money used to bail out banks. I would have let them sink.
-
What is your point here? Trying to make me believe that China is actually writing a check to the US for the tariffs?
-
In the interest of fairness: Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back" from the hundreds of millions of dollars given as bonus to Wall Street executives for their roles in the multi-billion dollar rescue of Bear Sterns, etc, which used tax-payer money and the investors didn't have to risk a penny?
Vivic wrote:
Exactly how many dollars did Obama "claw back" from the hundreds of millions of dollars given as bonus
In the interest of fairness, Obama has nothing to do with anything related to that. He wasn't an investigator or a lawyer in the Justice department. The laws that existed, at the time, were put in place before he was a president. And probably quite a while before he was even significant in the political scene. Not to mention of course that the ideological necessity of prosecutorial negotiations with defendants is something that has been going on for probably hundreds of years. Certainly before he was even born. Matter of fact the Federal Reserve Bank isn't even really a governmental agency. Which is something many conspiracy theory advocates love to point out. But the governance that does exist falls under Congress and not the President. And unless I am mistaken the bailout was provided before Obama even took office. Which would mean that the investigation was proceeding then as well. But perhaps you we referring specifically to something else.
-
Zero. Zip. Nil. Nada. Nul.
-
By how much did your taxes go up, and what percentage of it is now used to pay those tarifs?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
By how much did your taxes go up
Taxes? I presumed by the statement of "taxpayers" it was meant to refer to citizens of the US and not individual taxpayers as taxes. The citizens and other legal and even illegal residents of the US have already been "paying" in various ways such as losses to investment accounts and increases in various products that have been impacted.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
By how much did your taxes go up
Taxes? I presumed by the statement of "taxpayers" it was meant to refer to citizens of the US and not individual taxpayers as taxes. The citizens and other legal and even illegal residents of the US have already been "paying" in various ways such as losses to investment accounts and increases in various products that have been impacted.
-
-
-