Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Estimating software like omelettes

Estimating software like omelettes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csscomsalestoolsregex
44 Posts 25 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D devenv exe

    Marc Clifton wrote:

    And like an omelette, you have to break a few eggs to get the job done.

    And just un-like an omelette, the software job is never, ever done

    "Coming soon"

    B Offline
    B Offline
    BStorrar
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Surely you keep your omelette up to date with the latest frying pans and optional herbs and spices?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A agolddog

      A better question is, why are estimates that try to give specific timeframes important at all? I understand giving a broad swath, so the business can decide to pursue a project or not: if the estimate is "wow, this is huge", maybe they figure it's not worth doing. It seems that we've demonstrated time and again that for any non-trivial projects, estimates of completion are not only not accurate, they're mostly wildly inaccurate. Not necessarily due to the estimated work itself, but other things get in the way like support of current systems, illness, life events, whatever. It seems to me that it's a lot smarter try to break big projects into releasable chunks, and understand your dependencies. Then you might be able to say something like, "when step 1 is done, we'll start on step 2. Step 2 should take X days/weeks/months from its start date (which may not be immediately after step 1 completion)". If you can get your steps into small enough chunks to be understandable, you'll probably have a bit more success getting close to the time. Presenting things in this way makes it more understandable for non-technical people to understand dependencies and the fact the development does not have constant speed, and that they can also see progress on the overall project as we're ticking off steps.

      raddevusR Offline
      raddevusR Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Great post and I agree.

      agolddog wrote:

      It seems to me that it's a lot smarter try to break big projects into releasable chunks, and understand your dependencies. Then you might be able to say something like, "when step 1 is done, we'll start on step 2

      That's really the core of Agile Scrum*. * I know that this could start an entire other thread about Agile and what it is and what it is not. But what you've defined really is what the Real Agile advocates. Will the real Agile please stand up? Please stand up.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • raddevusR raddevus

        Reading thru The Mythical Man Month and there are quite a few interesting items.

        The Mythical Man-Month, Anniversary Edition: Essays On Software Engineering 2, Frederick P. Brooks Jr., eBook - Amazon.com[^]

        Gutless Estimating Observe that for the programmer, as for the chef, the urgency of the patron may govern the scheduled completion of the task, but it cannot govern the actual completion. An omelette, promised in two minutes, may appear to be progressing nicely. But when it has not set in two minutes, the customer has two choices --- wait or eat it raw. Software customers have had the same choices. The cook has another choice; he can turn up the heat. The result is often an omelette nothing can save --— burned in one part, raw in another. Now I do not think software managers have less inherent courage and firmness than chefs, nor than other engineering managers. But false scheduling to match the patron's desired date is much more common in our discipline than elsewhere in engineering. It is very difficult to make a vigorous, plausible, and job-risking defense of an estimate that is derived by no quantitative method, supported by little data, and certified chiefly by the hunches of the managers. Clearly two solutions are needed. We need to develop and publicize productivity figures, bug-incidence figures, estimating rules, and so on. The whole profession can only profit from sharing such data. Until estimating is on a sounder basis, individual managers will need to stiffen their backbones and defend their estimates with the assurance that their poor hunches are better than wish-derived estimates.

        I'm pretty sure that estimating hasn't changed at all since t

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        The problem was the (single) omelette. It should have been 2 eggs, bacon, toast, etc. You then get to deliver piece meal: the customer stays "hungry" (enthusiastic) because they're getting a steady stream of "ready" deliverables that can be consumes and / or assembled if so desired (egg sandwich?). Someone else may repurpose it later into an omelette. You cut back or delay certain deliverables without delaying or sacrificing the most desirable parts of the meal.

        The Master said, 'Am I indeed possessed of knowledge? I am not knowing. But if a mean person, who appears quite empty-like, ask anything of me, I set it forth from one end to the other, and exhaust it.' ― Confucian Analects

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          A bug in the hand in worth two in the SQL.

          Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

          G Offline
          G Offline
          Gary R Wheeler
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          My running partner at work occasionally shows me SQL statements that run to hundreds of lines. X| X| X| X| X| X| X|

          Software Zen: delete this;

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups