The Rotating Lepton Model
-
Interesting... I'll reserve judgement until I've (a) read the article, and (b) seen how precise their results are, and (c) seen a prediction made by their theory which differs from what the Standard Model predicts. Note that many numerologists, playing with numbers, have matched physical data to good accuracy. This doesn't mean that their "explanations" are correct.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
I cannot agree more with you. Indeed one needs to be extremely careful with judgement especially for such ground-breaking news.
-
Stylianos Polychroniadis wrote:
Everybody has an opinion nowadays I'm afraid.
In this cause, in a uniquely recursive manner, you are giving yours. The tone and context of your post brands your comment, as politely as prudence and good taste allow, as conceited arrogance. There are a good number of people in the CP lounge with a very lot of education in various areas of specialization - and the good taste not to arbitrarily share blurt out arbitrary facts to try to prove something (what?) to the rest of us. And at the same time - do I not prove your point?
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
Yes you do! That is correct. It is this very tone that I would love to see eliminated in a place where highly-intellectual people exchange views. And yes, I owe to the rest of the community an apology. So I am sincerely sorry, but I'm fed up with shallow and rushed sterile judgement.
-
No, wrong is the assumption that the model is another statistical tool and non-confrontational to the standard model. While in fact it is fundamentally a whole new theory that if proven correct (by what you correctly describe as validation) will replace the Standard Model.
Quote:
It's not a confrontational system; it's just a new set of statistical analyses, based on new-ish assumptions.
I am sorry you cannot follow my train of thought. Please note that my responses to you are simply in the spirit of your own reply.
I meant expressing one's opinions to other people in a confrontational manner. i.e. (as was perfectly clear, when I wrote it the first time), it's not "The Rotating Lepton Model vs the Standard Model", it's just "The Rotating Lepton Model". If you play the "I'm smarter than you!" card, you will not make many friends -- especially of people who are smarter than you. And saying that it's not statistical modelling is pure fantasy. Anyway, I'm bored with this, now, so I'll just enjoy the Lounge for what it is, rather than what you want it to be.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Yes you do! That is correct. It is this very tone that I would love to see eliminated in a place where highly-intellectual people exchange views. And yes, I owe to the rest of the community an apology. So I am sincerely sorry, but I'm fed up with shallow and rushed sterile judgement.
Even when we had the (now extinct) SoapBox and it's burly language and discussions, I had never observed a person so full of themselves as you appear to be. I suppose you can feel proud that you excel in something !
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010