Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Is this natures way?

Is this natures way?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
cssquestion
22 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mycroft Holmes
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

    N Greg UtasG K L Mike HankeyM 11 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Mycroft Holmes

      So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nelek
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      decimating? I don't know how it will end... but right now is not even thousandmating the population. And yes... I am taking the old definition of 10% to make the "joke", not the one of drastically reducing that is more extended today But answering your question in a bit more serious tone... I am not sure if mother nature really is after this virus or we could have something to do with it as a new conspiracy theory is saying (I don't really care) but I think it will still be less hard as we actually deserve. If I were the Mother Nature, I would be inmensely pissed off about humanity. Heck... being human myself, I am sometimes pissed off about humanity.

      M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

      F 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mycroft Holmes

        So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

        Greg UtasG Offline
        Greg UtasG Offline
        Greg Utas
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        You trot out "sky pixie" and anthropomorphize Mother Nature in the same post? It's just the usual competition among various sets of genes.

        Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles

        <p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
        <em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p>

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mycroft Holmes

          So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

          Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kalberts
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Right now, there is no problem in the USofA, is there? You've got a leader who has a natural understanding of the situation. My question is: If the pandemic hits different population groups with different strength - like when white man arrived in the new world with viruses hitting the natives like a bomb. Imagine now that Corona hits your garbage collectors, taxi drivers, street sweepers, and at the end of the summer: Your fruit pickers. Would it at all affect you? Or, what if the WASPs were the one that really took the blow - could they easily be replaced, in your private and work environment? For personal relationships I guess it really doesn't matter. "I'm sorry to hear that, but I still have 5119 friends on FB." That's it. Loosing a personal friend on FB may be restricted to deleting a line in your phone book.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nelek

            decimating? I don't know how it will end... but right now is not even thousandmating the population. And yes... I am taking the old definition of 10% to make the "joke", not the one of drastically reducing that is more extended today But answering your question in a bit more serious tone... I am not sure if mother nature really is after this virus or we could have something to do with it as a new conspiracy theory is saying (I don't really care) but I think it will still be less hard as we actually deserve. If I were the Mother Nature, I would be inmensely pissed off about humanity. Heck... being human myself, I am sometimes pissed off about humanity.

            M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

            F Offline
            F Offline
            F ES Sitecore
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Mortality among the vulnerable is about 8% I believe (compared to about 0.1% for the flu), so decimating is a fairly accurate use of the historical definition. When you factor in deaths by all ages that number comes down, obviously, but anyone who denies covid-19 is no more dangerous than the flu is being disingenuous.

            J O 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Mycroft Holmes

              So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

              Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Nature doesn't do things with intent, things just happen.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mycroft Holmes

                So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                K Offline
                K Offline
                kalberts
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                "Mother nature" certainly cares about life, but in a general sense, not "hunan" life in particular. Humans are in no way special. Any decimation of any population has attacked the weak ones, whether they are the old ones, the young ones or the sick ones, whether the attack is by diseases, predators or otherwise. You could ask Darwin about that. It is not a question about the survival of the fattest, but the survival of the fittest.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mycroft Holmes

                  So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                  Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                  Mike HankeyM Offline
                  Mike HankeyM Offline
                  Mike Hankey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  It's a warning; quit shitting on me.

                  Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday! JaxCoder.com

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mycroft Holmes

                    So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    It's probabilities: "bad habits" that eventually bite back. Like "radium" face powder for that "glow".

                    It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it. ― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mycroft Holmes

                      So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Johnny J
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I don't think so. I can point out at least a handful of people (or more) Mother Nature would definitely be better off without! :doh:

                      Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
                      Anonymous
                      -----
                      The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
                      Winston Churchill, 1944
                      -----
                      Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
                      Mark Twain

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mycroft Holmes

                        So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nand32
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        COVID-19 is certainly a low-level warning. If nature wanted, it could have made it really worse and keep the mortality rate to 30-40% and screw up the humans. It's a warning about: 1. Being more responsible towards the planet. 2. Pro-active control/balance of human population. 3. Refocusing on healthcare than Defense/Offense budgets. 4. Realize the possibility of friendship between unlikely countries. Like US helping China & Iran. 5. And finally, a moderated punishment for eating Batman's pet.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Nand32

                          COVID-19 is certainly a low-level warning. If nature wanted, it could have made it really worse and keep the mortality rate to 30-40% and screw up the humans. It's a warning about: 1. Being more responsible towards the planet. 2. Pro-active control/balance of human population. 3. Refocusing on healthcare than Defense/Offense budgets. 4. Realize the possibility of friendship between unlikely countries. Like US helping China & Iran. 5. And finally, a moderated punishment for eating Batman's pet.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Johnny J
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Nand32 wrote:

                          And finally, a moderated punishment for eating Batman's pet.

                          I thought you should say "killing John Wick's pet". Surely, Batman's only pet was a Robin, right? And I can imagine that roasted Robin could be quite delicious - albeit a very small mouthfull...

                          Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
                          Anonymous
                          -----
                          The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
                          Winston Churchill, 1944
                          -----
                          Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
                          Mark Twain

                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Mycroft Holmes

                            So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                            Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mark_Wallace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Don't even go there.  It's just evolution, so is indeed Mother Nature's way, but there's no sentient thought behind it. Conspiracy theories are fun (especially when you can sit back and watch the manic fervour that people defend them with), but getting religion involved will get people killed. Fave conspiracy theories, to date: 1. It's a Chinese secret weapon that escaped into the population. :sigh: In which case it's a pretty piss-poor weapon. :thumbsup: It gives a good reason for building a wall in China -- because walls work! :-O Oh, wait... 2. It's a US secret weapon, that was released in China and Iran, but, of course, the US army screwed it up. :sigh: In which case it's a pretty piss-poor weapon. :thumbsup: It explains why a certain-coloured person refuses to be tested -- he's already had the cure, and he doesn't want the testers to find out. See? Conspiracy theories are fun; religious cr@p, not.

                            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K kalberts

                              "Mother nature" certainly cares about life, but in a general sense, not "hunan" life in particular. Humans are in no way special. Any decimation of any population has attacked the weak ones, whether they are the old ones, the young ones or the sick ones, whether the attack is by diseases, predators or otherwise. You could ask Darwin about that. It is not a question about the survival of the fattest, but the survival of the fittest.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mark_Wallace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Member 7989122 wrote:

                              "Mother nature" certainly cares about life,

                              I wouldn't go that far. Mother Nature rules Jupiter, Venus, Mars, and all the rest, too. Life?  She doesn't give a damn.  It's completely irrelevant to her and to the universe.

                              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                              P 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Johnny J

                                Nand32 wrote:

                                And finally, a moderated punishment for eating Batman's pet.

                                I thought you should say "killing John Wick's pet". Surely, Batman's only pet was a Robin, right? And I can imagine that roasted Robin could be quite delicious - albeit a very small mouthfull...

                                Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
                                Anonymous
                                -----
                                The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
                                Winston Churchill, 1944
                                -----
                                Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
                                Mark Twain

                                N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Nand32
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                He's already available in packs :)[^]

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F F ES Sitecore

                                  Mortality among the vulnerable is about 8% I believe (compared to about 0.1% for the flu), so decimating is a fairly accurate use of the historical definition. When you factor in deaths by all ages that number comes down, obviously, but anyone who denies covid-19 is no more dangerous than the flu is being disingenuous.

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  jsc42
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  F-ES Sitecore wrote:

                                  decimating is a fairly accurate use of the historical definition

                                  I had heard that the original historical definition was to reduce to 10% (i.e. kill 90%), not reduce by 10% (i.e. leave 90%) which is the commonly understood meaning (and the one that I grew up understanding it to mean).

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J jsc42

                                    F-ES Sitecore wrote:

                                    decimating is a fairly accurate use of the historical definition

                                    I had heard that the original historical definition was to reduce to 10% (i.e. kill 90%), not reduce by 10% (i.e. leave 90%) which is the commonly understood meaning (and the one that I grew up understanding it to mean).

                                    F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    F ES Sitecore
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Decimation (Roman army) - Wikipedia[^]

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Mycroft Holmes

                                      So is this latest pandemic Mother natures way of reducing the population, decimating the elderly who are biologically less valuable that the young. Her way of implementing the 3 score and ten (I know that comes from the sky pixie but lets go with that). I am not trolling the forum much

                                      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity - RAH I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      dandy72
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Then it's failing spectacularly to do even that. It's a lot more efficient at decimating the world's economies than the population. My latest portfolio report can attest to that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F F ES Sitecore

                                        Mortality among the vulnerable is about 8% I believe (compared to about 0.1% for the flu), so decimating is a fairly accurate use of the historical definition. When you factor in deaths by all ages that number comes down, obviously, but anyone who denies covid-19 is no more dangerous than the flu is being disingenuous.

                                        O Offline
                                        O Offline
                                        obermd
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        No, we're being realists. The flue kills tens of thousands, and even into the hundreds of thousands each year. COVID-19 has so far killed less than 5,000 people. The real panic is because it's new.

                                        N F 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • O obermd

                                          No, we're being realists. The flue kills tens of thousands, and even into the hundreds of thousands each year. COVID-19 has so far killed less than 5,000 people. The real panic is because it's new.

                                          N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Nelek
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          obermd wrote:

                                          The real panic is because it's new.

                                          And because of the relativity of the numbers...

                                          obermd wrote:

                                          The flue kills tens of thousands

                                          From hundreds of millions infected

                                          obermd wrote:

                                          COVID-19 has so far killed less than 5,000 people.

                                          from around 110k people infected. And yes, I know.. most of them were old and not that healthy, but still the % numbers are higher than the flu. I hope you are right and it in the end is "less than the flu", I really hope it.

                                          M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups