Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Consistency...

Consistency...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comjson
29 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Greg UtasG Greg Utas

    Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

    there's only one thing in it that is absolutely prohibited, and that's Hungarian notation

    FTMFW! The worst shite ever dreamt up. I found a post about leading underscores which also pointed out that the trailing __t_'s that I occasionally use are reserved in POSIX standards. Yawn.

    Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jorgen Andersson
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Is that Apps Hungarian or Systems Hungarian? Systems Hungarian is indeed "The worst shite ever dreamt up", but Apps Hungarian I can understand even if I don't use it.

    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

    Greg UtasG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Marc Clifton

      Or the lack thereof:

      {
      "token_data": {
      "AccessToken": "eyJraWQiOi..."
      }
      }

      Look, either use underscores or don't. Make Request with JWT · massgov/LicenseValidationAPI Wiki · GitHub[^] I deal with idiots when I have to work with 3rd party API's.

      Latest Articles:
      Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

      H Offline
      H Offline
      HellsHarlot
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      You also don't know how to use the apostrophe. APIs 🤦‍♀️

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kalberts

        I suppose you know the three ways of drinking whisky? With water, without water and like water.

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nelek
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        To be honest... no, I didn't know it. But I will remember it ;) Is a good one:thumbsup: :laugh: :laugh:

        M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K kalberts

          k5054 wrote:

          Everyone knows that identifiers starting with an underscore are reserved for the implementation.

          Let me just check that I get this right now: Identifiers not starting with an underscore is for those modules that are not yet implemented. ... Did I get it right this time=?

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lorenzo Bertolino
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          The way I understood it is that identifiers that begin with _ are private or supposedly private (for languages that don't enforce such thing) those that don't are public I might very well be wrong

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Or the lack thereof:

            {
            "token_data": {
            "AccessToken": "eyJraWQiOi..."
            }
            }

            Look, either use underscores or don't. Make Request with JWT · massgov/LicenseValidationAPI Wiki · GitHub[^] I deal with idiots when I have to work with 3rd party API's.

            Latest Articles:
            Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

            Sander RosselS Offline
            Sander RosselS Offline
            Sander Rossel
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            I agree completely. Consistency eases the mind and the eye, clearing your head to think about important matters instead of how this particular variable is cased. Consistency in code can reduce errors and so create consistent quality as well (or maybe it's the other way around). If I find inconsistent code I immediately assume it's written by some bungler who was so occupied understanding basic programming that there was simply no mental space left for consistency. And usually I'm right. If you can't even get consistency right, the rest of the code probably sucks as well. When I look at that library I also see variables such as "username_val", where I presume "val" is short for "value". What else than a value are you going to enter anyway? :confused: It seems like an API created by a government, 'nuff said :rolleyes:

            Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jorgen Andersson

              Is that Apps Hungarian or Systems Hungarian? Systems Hungarian is indeed "The worst shite ever dreamt up", but Apps Hungarian I can understand even if I don't use it.

              Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

              Greg UtasG Offline
              Greg UtasG Offline
              Greg Utas
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              I had to look this up, because I didn't realize there were two variants. So thanks for prompting that! Apps Hungarian isn't as bad, but arcane prefixed abbreviations to denote a purpose don't appeal to me. If something has a small scope, such as a loop variable, a single letter often works as a name. If it has a large scope, I'd rather see it spelled out.

              Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles

              <p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
              <em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p>

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                Or the lack thereof:

                {
                "token_data": {
                "AccessToken": "eyJraWQiOi..."
                }
                }

                Look, either use underscores or don't. Make Request with JWT · massgov/LicenseValidationAPI Wiki · GitHub[^] I deal with idiots when I have to work with 3rd party API's.

                Latest Articles:
                Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Col Wolf
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Consistent standards would be nice. I haven't seen any code that included a style guideline, though it might be helpful if the naming convention is complicated.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Marc Clifton

                  Or the lack thereof:

                  {
                  "token_data": {
                  "AccessToken": "eyJraWQiOi..."
                  }
                  }

                  Look, either use underscores or don't. Make Request with JWT · massgov/LicenseValidationAPI Wiki · GitHub[^] I deal with idiots when I have to work with 3rd party API's.

                  Latest Articles:
                  Abusing Extension Methods, Null Continuation, and Null Coalescence Operators

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  agolddog
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Hey, you must be trying to use our API! Don't worry, the inconsistent names will be the least of your problems.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                    I agree completely. Consistency eases the mind and the eye, clearing your head to think about important matters instead of how this particular variable is cased. Consistency in code can reduce errors and so create consistent quality as well (or maybe it's the other way around). If I find inconsistent code I immediately assume it's written by some bungler who was so occupied understanding basic programming that there was simply no mental space left for consistency. And usually I'm right. If you can't even get consistency right, the rest of the code probably sucks as well. When I look at that library I also see variables such as "username_val", where I presume "val" is short for "value". What else than a value are you going to enter anyway? :confused: It seems like an API created by a government, 'nuff said :rolleyes:

                    Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    agolddog
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    Sander Rossel wrote:

                    If I find inconsistent code I immediately assume it's written by some bungler who was so occupied understanding basic programming that there was simply no mental space left for consistency.

                    Slight disagreement there. The bunglers with which I work not only don't understand basic programming, they have no interest in learning.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Gary R Wheeler

                      Yes, but I relented on that issue in order to achieve a compromise on underscores. I didn't want underscores in the leading position at all, while Mr. Object wanted underscores to be prohibited unless they were in the leading position indicating scope. I use underscores in locals which for me are generally all lower case. I also use underscores in globals when the name includes an acronym: ObjectABC_Factory, for example, where ABC is the acronym. Back story: My group has a naming convention and coding style document that is 1½ pages, and most of it recommends rather requires or prohibits. In fact, I think there's only one thing in it that is absolutely prohibited, and that's Hungarian notation. When we created this document in 2000, that was still quite a thing when doing Windows programming. The only place we allow it to be used is in argument names for callback functions, and they are recommended to use the same names as in the documentation. For what it's worth, we've never had a conflict between our use of leading underscores and any compiler in the last 20 years, and that's spread over tens of millions of lines of C, C++, and C# code.

                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      StarNamer workS Offline
                      StarNamer workS Offline
                      StarNamer work
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      The original Hungarian notation was actually supposed to be useful at the time. The prefix should have been a 'type' as in 'size', 'color', 'frequency', 'voltage', etc. So if you defined your variables as;

                      float szAnimal, szElephant
                      float colAnimal, colElephant
                      float vLethal
                      

                      Then when you looked at the code, the line:

                      szAnimal = colElephant \* 0.5
                      

                      Should ring alarm bells, while:

                      vLethal = VoltagToKillBySize(szElephant)
                      

                      is fine! Of course, once idiots started using stupid prefixes like iCount, fWeight, pData and similar it became the spawn of the devil and was rightly banned by all sane people.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups