Green lines
-
What is the significance of some subject lines being displayed in green, rather than blue?
As a side note, it's good to be green! :-D
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Suggestion: If you want to use your member number as a Lounge name, why not convert it to hexadecimal? That will be unique at least! :)
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
Actually, all member names are unique. :) /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
What is the significance of some subject lines being displayed in green, rather than blue?
I just made your post green. Go Green.
-
I just made your post green. Go Green.
Mind Blown! :O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Mind Blown! :O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
In a green way I see. :)
-
As a side note, it's good to be green! :-D
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Actually, [it's not easy being green](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRZ-IxZ46ng)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Actually, [it's not easy being green](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRZ-IxZ46ng)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
But... You made it to absolute greeness already! :O
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Suggestion: If you want to use your member number as a Lounge name, why not convert it to hexadecimal? That will be unique at least! :)
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
Great idea! I will do that. I have participated in network discussions since long before WWW: We had NetNews (aka. Usenet) for years, and before that, there were bulletin boards. Not all were national, or even distributed on several machines: The first discussion forum I used was run on one central computer, serving 1500 Minnesota high scools through modem lines. When I started college, all Norwegian universities had a common forum on a Decsystem-20, where we had fierce arguments as students do... In all serious discussions, I find it more essential what is in an argument, than who makes it. No argument is more valid because it is made by my favorite politician. Or favorite author. The contents of the statement is what counts, and how well it is justified or founded. An esteemed professor will probably have better justifications for his claims - but only within his field(s). A nuclear scientist is no better than my neighbour in commenting cultural conflicts in South-East Asia. Both may make justified claims, but not because they are, say, an artist, or a professor in a completely unrelated field. I want people to judge my arguments as such, by their contents, detached from my person. If my argument is invalid (or less valid) because I am Norwegian, or male, or have 35+ years of working experience, then it is no more valid if made by a 30 year old female US citizen. If you need to know my complexion, eye and hair color, number of brothers and sisters and birthday to judge (or enjoy) what I am writing, that is your problem, not mine! I do not see clearly what you gain by me replacing one anonymous ID with another anonymous ID. Neither tells my body height or political affiliation. I guess that if I chose some "normal" personal name, it would be easier for you to "profile" me in your head, so that you can more easily judge arguments from me in light of that profile. You will probably learn to recognize my anonymous hex number as well, because there aren't that many hex named users. You could even learn to recognize my decimal member number! In any case, changes will be made. I will probably create an all new user, whose profile (not in the techical sense, but as a mapping of opinions, statements and attitudes) is independent of the old one. I guess that before I make the switch, I need some training in writing one-liners: I have had lots of negative comments about my explanations, justifications my claims etc., so I will try to avoid that in the future. If someone wants to ig
-
What is the significance of some subject lines being displayed in green, rather than blue?
Interesting, I don't think I ever noticed that before. :laugh:
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other. Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
Great idea! I will do that. I have participated in network discussions since long before WWW: We had NetNews (aka. Usenet) for years, and before that, there were bulletin boards. Not all were national, or even distributed on several machines: The first discussion forum I used was run on one central computer, serving 1500 Minnesota high scools through modem lines. When I started college, all Norwegian universities had a common forum on a Decsystem-20, where we had fierce arguments as students do... In all serious discussions, I find it more essential what is in an argument, than who makes it. No argument is more valid because it is made by my favorite politician. Or favorite author. The contents of the statement is what counts, and how well it is justified or founded. An esteemed professor will probably have better justifications for his claims - but only within his field(s). A nuclear scientist is no better than my neighbour in commenting cultural conflicts in South-East Asia. Both may make justified claims, but not because they are, say, an artist, or a professor in a completely unrelated field. I want people to judge my arguments as such, by their contents, detached from my person. If my argument is invalid (or less valid) because I am Norwegian, or male, or have 35+ years of working experience, then it is no more valid if made by a 30 year old female US citizen. If you need to know my complexion, eye and hair color, number of brothers and sisters and birthday to judge (or enjoy) what I am writing, that is your problem, not mine! I do not see clearly what you gain by me replacing one anonymous ID with another anonymous ID. Neither tells my body height or political affiliation. I guess that if I chose some "normal" personal name, it would be easier for you to "profile" me in your head, so that you can more easily judge arguments from me in light of that profile. You will probably learn to recognize my anonymous hex number as well, because there aren't that many hex named users. You could even learn to recognize my decimal member number! In any case, changes will be made. I will probably create an all new user, whose profile (not in the techical sense, but as a mapping of opinions, statements and attitudes) is independent of the old one. I guess that before I make the switch, I need some training in writing one-liners: I have had lots of negative comments about my explanations, justifications my claims etc., so I will try to avoid that in the future. If someone wants to ig
Member 7989122 wrote:
I do not see clearly what you gain by me replacing one anonymous ID with another anonymous ID
It makes it easier to follow discussions, or rather the train of thought that spans many different discussions. A number is less easy for the brain to recognise. I agree with your statements above that one.
Member 7989122 wrote:
I guess that before I make the switch, I need some training in writing one-liners: I have had lots of negative comments about my explanations, justifications my claims etc., so I will try to avoid that in the future.
Pity, I like it when people do explain. I also like those stories on how things were done in the "old times". Maybe I should've told you so earlier? Are you sure those people didn't disagree with you on something you may have stated rather than having disliked getting an explanation as such?
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger