Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Meat on a Monday

Meat on a Monday

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csshelpquestionlounge
30 Posts 19 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R RobertSF

    We need to start by shedding the delusion that the wealthiest, most ruthless among us, are the most admirable people. At the root of everything, that's the problem. We just can't say no to them, and it's them who are dragging us down in the race to the bottom.

    honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitchH Offline
    honey the codewitch
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I won't weigh in on other countries and cultures but here in the US I think some of that we got saddled with by way of the Puritans. Forgive me because I have to mention religion here, but none of this is intended to weigh in on religion or a specific religion. This is about groups of people and the way they treated others: The Puritans did not flee England because of religious persecution as the popular yarn goes. The reality is they were chased out of England because they insisted everyone had to live like they do and so they made a lot of enemies. Everyone wanted them gone. Although nobody here calls themselves a Puritan anymore they have plenty of ideological descendants in the states today. They brought with them the notion that if you're prosperous, it's because you are righteous. That's a big seller in the US even today. It's a funny thing, because their religion almost says the opposite, but here we are.

    Real programmers use butterflies

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

      I'd argue not that we're on a path to extinction - we might be - but more I'm arguing that we're likely going to experience a significant downsizing of the human population within the coming generations - I don't exactly how far out, because everything is a moving target, at best. That's not extinction. In the big picture, it's simple, ruthless culling. Global human population growth is still increasing, just slower than it has been since its peak in 1989. I'm simply arguing we're likely going to see that graph of steady growth get a crater in it.

      Real programmers use butterflies

      D Offline
      D Offline
      dandy72
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      I was just listening to one of Neil deGrasse Tyson's podcasts yesterday. His guest pointed out (and rightly so) that we've had plagues before, that wiped out large percentages of the human population. We've never gone extinct, but we just need one sufficient large rock to take care of that. And George Carlin is absolutely right in his [earth plus plastic](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W33HRc1A6c) skit, the earth has survived much worse than we as puny humans could throw at it even if we tried our best.

      honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

        Those of you that don't already think I'm off probably haven't heard one of my early morning rants about random, broad topics. Like the nature of humankind: For those of you that believe (acknowledge?) we as a species are headed for unusually spectacular disaster, maybe after nature downsizes "right sizes" us we'll learn from our mistakes. I doubt it though, if only because I don't believe in free will. I think we're as much animals as our primate ancestors. Our behavior is just more complex, but no less "scripted" (for want of a better term). So in the end, we repeat ancient patterns with new window dressing, and get up to the same mistakes over and over again. Then again, I think this isn't a bug. It's a feature. We're slaves to the complex adaptive systems we are entangled with, and our navigation of that requires those mistakes in order for us to maintain adaptivity. Even a mass die off, should it happen would be as necessary as it was inevitable. We do what we have to to survive, even if that means war, and exploiting people in our own back yard or on the other side of the planet. Even if it means we become victims of our own unsustainable success. I think to change that means to fundamentally - and I mean fundamentally as profoundly as it can be expressed - change who we are and the way we operate. We need to change the very wiring in our walls - rewrite our neurons, and escape the meat cages we are in. I firmly believe that it's the meat that ultimately holds us back. Meat ties us to the earth, and forces us to live within its confines, subject to its cruel systems in order to receive its blessings. I don't think we'll move past animal stage until we redefine what it means to be human in the first place. I'm not wedded to this view, it just seems the most likely to me. *hides*

        Real programmers use butterflies

        B Offline
        B Offline
        BernardIE5317
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Greetings Kind Regards Looking over the history of our species is it not clear we are becoming more peaceful except of course for the occasional fascist and communist . The brutality of our ancestors was incredible to wit i.e. e.g. we no longer rip out the intestines of convicted criminals for public display , I am thinking of the Mel Gibson movie "Braveheart" . For another judges impose the death sentence on convicted criminals less frequently . For another slavery is of course a thing of the past except again as practiced by the occasional fascist and communist . I conclude we are slowly becoming civilized - Cheerio "I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright "Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman My sympathies to the SPAM moderator “I want to sing, I want to cry, I want to laugh. Everything together. And jump and dance. The day has arrive — yippee!” - Desmond Tutu “When the green flag drops the bullshit stops!” "It is cheaper to save the world than it is to ruin it."

        honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

          I won't weigh in on other countries and cultures but here in the US I think some of that we got saddled with by way of the Puritans. Forgive me because I have to mention religion here, but none of this is intended to weigh in on religion or a specific religion. This is about groups of people and the way they treated others: The Puritans did not flee England because of religious persecution as the popular yarn goes. The reality is they were chased out of England because they insisted everyone had to live like they do and so they made a lot of enemies. Everyone wanted them gone. Although nobody here calls themselves a Puritan anymore they have plenty of ideological descendants in the states today. They brought with them the notion that if you're prosperous, it's because you are righteous. That's a big seller in the US even today. It's a funny thing, because their religion almost says the opposite, but here we are.

          Real programmers use butterflies

          R Offline
          R Offline
          RobertSF
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Indeed, the Puritans were Calvinists, and Calvinism had a deep influence in American society. The logic goes like this. Since God is all-wise and all-powerful, if you are rich, it can only be because he sees that you're a good person and he's made you rich. You must be a morally upstanding person if you're rich because, if you were not good, God would send bad things your way to punish you. Then you would be poor. And yes, the poor are poor because they're lazy, vice-ridden fornicators. If only they worked hard and followed the straight and narrow, God would make them rich. It's so easy, and yet they don't do it. That's because the poor are bad on purpose. They're just no good. And since God has decreed that the poor are not good people, then it stands to reason that helping the poor is tantamount to undermining God's punishment. Now you can see what informs America's attitudes about welfare.

          honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R RobertSF

            Indeed, the Puritans were Calvinists, and Calvinism had a deep influence in American society. The logic goes like this. Since God is all-wise and all-powerful, if you are rich, it can only be because he sees that you're a good person and he's made you rich. You must be a morally upstanding person if you're rich because, if you were not good, God would send bad things your way to punish you. Then you would be poor. And yes, the poor are poor because they're lazy, vice-ridden fornicators. If only they worked hard and followed the straight and narrow, God would make them rich. It's so easy, and yet they don't do it. That's because the poor are bad on purpose. They're just no good. And since God has decreed that the poor are not good people, then it stands to reason that helping the poor is tantamount to undermining God's punishment. Now you can see what informs America's attitudes about welfare.

            honey the codewitchH Offline
            honey the codewitchH Offline
            honey the codewitch
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Yep. And it's awful. Human beings will pervert any message to justify their own selfishness.

            Real programmers use butterflies

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B BernardIE5317

              Greetings Kind Regards Looking over the history of our species is it not clear we are becoming more peaceful except of course for the occasional fascist and communist . The brutality of our ancestors was incredible to wit i.e. e.g. we no longer rip out the intestines of convicted criminals for public display , I am thinking of the Mel Gibson movie "Braveheart" . For another judges impose the death sentence on convicted criminals less frequently . For another slavery is of course a thing of the past except again as practiced by the occasional fascist and communist . I conclude we are slowly becoming civilized - Cheerio "I once put instant coffee into the microwave and went back in time." - Steven Wright "Shut up and calculate" - apparently N. David Mermin possibly Richard Feynman My sympathies to the SPAM moderator “I want to sing, I want to cry, I want to laugh. Everything together. And jump and dance. The day has arrive — yippee!” - Desmond Tutu “When the green flag drops the bullshit stops!” "It is cheaper to save the world than it is to ruin it."

              honey the codewitchH Offline
              honey the codewitchH Offline
              honey the codewitch
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              We're becoming more civilized. It just means we've gotten better at domesticating ourselves. But that domestication is fragile. It's easy for people to go feral. Look at the US today, and we're not even looking at a localized societal collapse. A good 1/3 of humans will kill the other 1/3 while 1/3 watches. It's only the act of self-domestication that prevents it. And that goes south pretty quickly, for example when a social sickness like fascism (which is not ideology) infects democracies. Self-domestication doesn't change our nature. It just trains us to do better, but that's not permanent. Adding: Don't get me started on slavery, which we still practice. We just retired chattel slavery. It wasn't economically viable. In todays labor market you need to maintain flexibility, so it's more cost effective to lease your slaves - especially offshore - than it is to buy them outright.

              Real programmers use butterflies

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D dandy72

                I was just listening to one of Neil deGrasse Tyson's podcasts yesterday. His guest pointed out (and rightly so) that we've had plagues before, that wiped out large percentages of the human population. We've never gone extinct, but we just need one sufficient large rock to take care of that. And George Carlin is absolutely right in his [earth plus plastic](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W33HRc1A6c) skit, the earth has survived much worse than we as puny humans could throw at it even if we tried our best.

                honey the codewitchH Offline
                honey the codewitchH Offline
                honey the codewitch
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                I agree, and even the rock won't get us without a fight, which is why I don't bet against us. :)

                Real programmers use butterflies

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

                  Those of you that don't already think I'm off probably haven't heard one of my early morning rants about random, broad topics. Like the nature of humankind: For those of you that believe (acknowledge?) we as a species are headed for unusually spectacular disaster, maybe after nature downsizes "right sizes" us we'll learn from our mistakes. I doubt it though, if only because I don't believe in free will. I think we're as much animals as our primate ancestors. Our behavior is just more complex, but no less "scripted" (for want of a better term). So in the end, we repeat ancient patterns with new window dressing, and get up to the same mistakes over and over again. Then again, I think this isn't a bug. It's a feature. We're slaves to the complex adaptive systems we are entangled with, and our navigation of that requires those mistakes in order for us to maintain adaptivity. Even a mass die off, should it happen would be as necessary as it was inevitable. We do what we have to to survive, even if that means war, and exploiting people in our own back yard or on the other side of the planet. Even if it means we become victims of our own unsustainable success. I think to change that means to fundamentally - and I mean fundamentally as profoundly as it can be expressed - change who we are and the way we operate. We need to change the very wiring in our walls - rewrite our neurons, and escape the meat cages we are in. I firmly believe that it's the meat that ultimately holds us back. Meat ties us to the earth, and forces us to live within its confines, subject to its cruel systems in order to receive its blessings. I don't think we'll move past animal stage until we redefine what it means to be human in the first place. I'm not wedded to this view, it just seems the most likely to me. *hides*

                  Real programmers use butterflies

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jacquers
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  My view (I'm religious): Sin is what's wrong with humanity. It's because of sin that humans are estranged from God and why they are like that and why all the bad things happen.

                  honey the codewitchH 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jacquers

                    My view (I'm religious): Sin is what's wrong with humanity. It's because of sin that humans are estranged from God and why they are like that and why all the bad things happen.

                    honey the codewitchH Offline
                    honey the codewitchH Offline
                    honey the codewitch
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    What I'm saying about us is a secular read of an interpretation of Genesis. I'm *not* religious, but the Torah, and by extension, the old testament is profoundly useful if you know how to use it. It's ancient sociology - shows us how we work, both individually and collectively. I wasn't raised with it, so I'll only ever get so much out of it compared to someone that studied it since childhood. But regardless, I am pretty confident in my eschatology (if you want to call it that) which draws largely from the fall of man story in genesis, and an interpretation of what the curse in the exile from the garden is, and how we transcend it in the end. As Noah did in part with his invention of the plow, easing the curse of toil. This is precisely what "God wants" - metaphor here - (although I don't anthropomorphize God in that way, just trying to convey a concept) I won't go deeper here, because I don't want to start a deep dive on this topic here, especially with someone who is religious (no offense) simply because I don't want to veer into religious territory. But what I wrote is informed in part by abrahamic scripture.

                    Real programmers use butterflies

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • honey the codewitchH honey the codewitch

                      Those of you that don't already think I'm off probably haven't heard one of my early morning rants about random, broad topics. Like the nature of humankind: For those of you that believe (acknowledge?) we as a species are headed for unusually spectacular disaster, maybe after nature downsizes "right sizes" us we'll learn from our mistakes. I doubt it though, if only because I don't believe in free will. I think we're as much animals as our primate ancestors. Our behavior is just more complex, but no less "scripted" (for want of a better term). So in the end, we repeat ancient patterns with new window dressing, and get up to the same mistakes over and over again. Then again, I think this isn't a bug. It's a feature. We're slaves to the complex adaptive systems we are entangled with, and our navigation of that requires those mistakes in order for us to maintain adaptivity. Even a mass die off, should it happen would be as necessary as it was inevitable. We do what we have to to survive, even if that means war, and exploiting people in our own back yard or on the other side of the planet. Even if it means we become victims of our own unsustainable success. I think to change that means to fundamentally - and I mean fundamentally as profoundly as it can be expressed - change who we are and the way we operate. We need to change the very wiring in our walls - rewrite our neurons, and escape the meat cages we are in. I firmly believe that it's the meat that ultimately holds us back. Meat ties us to the earth, and forces us to live within its confines, subject to its cruel systems in order to receive its blessings. I don't think we'll move past animal stage until we redefine what it means to be human in the first place. I'm not wedded to this view, it just seems the most likely to me. *hides*

                      Real programmers use butterflies

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Member_15510360
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      You said it right and no matter how much we'll try but because of the other factors in our life we tend to come back to the same position of being selfish, short tempered and eager to get everything for ourself. There no way we can escape from this. We never know what other person is thinking of us but we want to show ourself foolish by caring extra about others.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups