Thank you, Microsoft
-
YUP! Here is an example. Starts at 1. There are several other numbered fields: Other Provider Identifier Issuer_50
:laugh:. I mean :doh:
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++
-
Objects in Access include: table; query; form; report. There are more, essentially everything inside.
well, okay, I understand. But having lived in a company that had really smart people and killed off by marketing, it still smells to me like a marketing issue.... with the # of updates of products, Microsoft should have no issue of updating access instead of rounding corners for notepad. yes, I'm tossing the total bullshit flag
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
-
David O'Neil wrote:
Designing queries in Access seems MUCH easier than SQL's offering
:thumbsup: It irritates me every time I use the query designer in SSMS...take the time to arrange tables/objects in the designer, run the query, return to the designer and find that everything is back to being stacked vertical...it can't even remember the last window size ffs! :laugh: At least the Access designer remembers the layout. Additionally, because I need the same queries to work in both Access and SQL Server, I need to design in Access as table/view joins designed in Access will always work in SQL Server, but not the other way around. Oh yeah, and I also prefer Access < 2007. (.mdb) I've ranted about this before, but you'd think that the SSMS team would put a little more effort into the query designer. Every update nag I get, I wonder 'have they fixed it?' and every update I'm dissappointed! :sigh:
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse "Hope is contagious"