Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. CodeProject outage

CodeProject outage

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
sysadminsecurityannouncement
23 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Maunder

    At around 2AM this morning things started to go a little pear-shaped with our servers. Our tech guys were looking into it trying to work out what was happening, but it became a all-hands exercise in trying to work out what broke what. We had updated CodeProject's code. So we redeployed, cleaned and deployed, rolled back and cleaned and deployed. It wasn't our code. Our requests per second were a little crazy. As in 1000x what we normally would get, but nothing that set off the DoS alarms. Things were adjusted to ease the load but the load remained uneased. Finally, with zero load we still had the site pinned. It turns out the firewall needs replacing. Firewall fixed, load reduced, site back up. Mostly. There were also a series of Windows patches that were installed as part of routine maintenance. These were to do with HTTP security, so they naturally got some attention. Uninstalling Windows patches can be painful, but once one of the patches was removed everything popped back up. However, that was only on 1 of the servers, so that patch, since it's a security update, will be reinstalled, and if it causes issues the entire server will be binned and a new one rolled in. So: fun and games at CodeProject central and I apologise for being down for so long. This was a bit of a trifecta, but we're now into mopping up and analysis stage so :beer: all round.

    cheers Chris Maunder

    abmvA Offline
    abmvA Offline
    abmv
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    so there was some windows patch and the firewall config raising the cpu weird.......

    Caveat Emptor. "Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long

    We are in the beginning of a mass extinction. - Greta Thunberg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Gary R Wheeler

      Must... not... tell... war... story... It involved a customer replacing the 1Gb hub we have in our equipment with a 100Mb hub they had laying around. They had the audacity to (1) not tell us what they had done, (2) lie when we asked them point blank what they had changed, and (3) tried to hide the evidence when a [very sleepy after a 10 hour drive] field service dude showed up. Irrelevant side note: the outage must be Jeremy's fault, since he raised the subject of uptime a few threads down.

      Software Zen: delete this;

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nelek
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Gary R. Wheeler wrote:

      Irrelevant side note: the outage must be Jeremy's fault, since he raised the subject of uptime a few threads down.

      I thought the same :rolleyes: :laugh: :laugh:

      M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D dandy72

        Trading known problems with brand new unknown ones. Hmmmm, tough choice...

        O Offline
        O Offline
        obeobe
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Obviously it was tongue in cheek, but seriously, Windows updates too often break stuff, and Murphy's law ensures that they break said stuff at the most inconvenient times.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O obeobe

          Obviously it was tongue in cheek, but seriously, Windows updates too often break stuff, and Murphy's law ensures that they break said stuff at the most inconvenient times.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          dandy72
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          obeobe wrote:

          Obviously it was tongue in cheek, but seriously,

          The problem is that some people make that sort of suggestion while being absolutely serious.

          obeobe wrote:

          Windows updates too often break stuff

          Can't argue there...

          obeobe wrote:

          they break said stuff at the most inconvenient times.

          Is there ever a convenient time during which updates should be okay to break stuff...?

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D dandy72

            obeobe wrote:

            Obviously it was tongue in cheek, but seriously,

            The problem is that some people make that sort of suggestion while being absolutely serious.

            obeobe wrote:

            Windows updates too often break stuff

            Can't argue there...

            obeobe wrote:

            they break said stuff at the most inconvenient times.

            Is there ever a convenient time during which updates should be okay to break stuff...?

            J Offline
            J Offline
            jschell
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            dandy72 wrote:

            Is there ever a convenient time during which updates should be okay to break stuff...?

            When I am on vacation and unreachable?

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J jschell

              dandy72 wrote:

              Is there ever a convenient time during which updates should be okay to break stuff...?

              When I am on vacation and unreachable?

              D Offline
              D Offline
              dandy72
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              ...so less qualified people rush their own fix that you then inherit when you come back...?

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D dandy72

                ...so less qualified people rush their own fix that you then inherit when you come back...?

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jschell
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                well yes...but that of course leads to job security...since of course by then the higher ups learn that only I can fix things!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jeremy Falcon

                  Chris Maunder wrote:

                  if it causes issues the entire server will be binned and a new one rolled in

                  So you know Chris, ever think about hosting CP on Debian? :-\

                  Jeremy Falcon

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Maunder
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  We have this awful albatross of a webforms project that ruins the fun. .NET Core, Linux, PostgreSQL or MariaDB and I'd be so happy and our costs would be dramatically lower. Sigh.

                  cheers Chris Maunder

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Gary R Wheeler

                    Must... not... tell... war... story... It involved a customer replacing the 1Gb hub we have in our equipment with a 100Mb hub they had laying around. They had the audacity to (1) not tell us what they had done, (2) lie when we asked them point blank what they had changed, and (3) tried to hide the evidence when a [very sleepy after a 10 hour drive] field service dude showed up. Irrelevant side note: the outage must be Jeremy's fault, since he raised the subject of uptime a few threads down.

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Chris Maunder
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    10% of capacity? But what could do wrong? ;)

                    cheers Chris Maunder

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Maunder

                      10% of capacity? But what could do wrong? ;)

                      cheers Chris Maunder

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      Gary R Wheeler
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Especially on a machine printing both sides of the paper at 17 feet per second, full color, front and back.

                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups