Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Pi-hole and ISP-provided routers...

Pi-hole and ISP-provided routers...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionsysadminlinuxalgorithmsworkspace
23 Posts 10 Posters 30 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chad3F

    Your router doesn't support bridge mode, or theirs doesn't? Are you limited to OEM firmware on your router, or can you install open source firmware (e.g. OpenWRT) to expand its functionality?

    D Offline
    D Offline
    dandy72
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    *My* router is already running third-party firmware (DD-WRT). My *ISP*'s router doesn't support bridge mode. It's from Rogers, up here in Canada. They sent me a Nokia FastMile 5G Gateway. I've found plenty of threads written by people who are a lot better at networking than I am, and they're all saying the same thing. You're SOL. I do understand some of the alternatives one might still have, but that'll be a rather unpleasant and time-consuming transition. I need my connection for work, so I can't afford much down time.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D dandy72

      *My* router is already running third-party firmware (DD-WRT). My *ISP*'s router doesn't support bridge mode. It's from Rogers, up here in Canada. They sent me a Nokia FastMile 5G Gateway. I've found plenty of threads written by people who are a lot better at networking than I am, and they're all saying the same thing. You're SOL. I do understand some of the alternatives one might still have, but that'll be a rather unpleasant and time-consuming transition. I need my connection for work, so I can't afford much down time.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chad3F
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      If no one else has suggested it, how about this possibility: Configure your router as a bridge (WAN<->LAN), instead of NAT. Block all DHCP traffic from their router and do your own DHCP server with compatible address pool settings. So all devices will still route through their device, but you fully control the DHCP settings.

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Chad3F

        If no one else has suggested it, how about this possibility: Configure your router as a bridge (WAN<->LAN), instead of NAT. Block all DHCP traffic from their router and do your own DHCP server with compatible address pool settings. So all devices will still route through their device, but you fully control the DHCP settings.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        dandy72
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        That's an interesting idea. I'll have to read up on the details.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups