Techno-melon!
-
I'd never heard of someone playing a watermelon before! MEZERG - WATERMELON 🍉[^]
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver
-
I'd never heard of someone playing a watermelon before! MEZERG - WATERMELON 🍉[^]
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver
If you care for vegetable instruments, you should check up The Vegetable Orchestra. The Vegetable Orchestra Literally Plays with Their Food[^] (YouTube) is a nice presentation of how they make and use their instruments. For a concert performance without disturbing voice comments, try The Vegetable Orchestra - Transplants[^] - there are several others at YouTube. This definitely is not "Techno" style - all their instruments are unplugged, all acoustic. I didn't see them playing water melon, but it seems like their standard bass drum is a pumkin.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
-
If you care for vegetable instruments, you should check up The Vegetable Orchestra. The Vegetable Orchestra Literally Plays with Their Food[^] (YouTube) is a nice presentation of how they make and use their instruments. For a concert performance without disturbing voice comments, try The Vegetable Orchestra - Transplants[^] - there are several others at YouTube. This definitely is not "Techno" style - all their instruments are unplugged, all acoustic. I didn't see them playing water melon, but it seems like their standard bass drum is a pumkin.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
-
I refuse to clink on that lick :)
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
Fair enough if you reject any link to YouTube. I never heard of malware spread by ordinary YouTube watching, but I may be ignorant. If what you intend to say is that 'I have against YouTube in general, and I will not support it by navigating to it', you are of course welcome to - but you draw much more attention to YouTube that way, making people a lot more aware of it. Either you should state why you refuse to watch YouTube movies, or people will as 'Why not? There is no reason for your rejection'. Besides: I could of course repeatedly state that my favorite hobby is to not collect stamps. Who would care about what I do not do? Who would care about your not watching a YouTube movie? If you do not trust it to be a YouTube link even if the bottom line (in most browsers, or a separate field) says so, then the implication is that you do not trust any new link, no matter how authenticated it is - only those links that you know from before. That would limit your web browsing down to what I would consider useless. It may be sufficient for you, though!
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
-
Fair enough if you reject any link to YouTube. I never heard of malware spread by ordinary YouTube watching, but I may be ignorant. If what you intend to say is that 'I have against YouTube in general, and I will not support it by navigating to it', you are of course welcome to - but you draw much more attention to YouTube that way, making people a lot more aware of it. Either you should state why you refuse to watch YouTube movies, or people will as 'Why not? There is no reason for your rejection'. Besides: I could of course repeatedly state that my favorite hobby is to not collect stamps. Who would care about what I do not do? Who would care about your not watching a YouTube movie? If you do not trust it to be a YouTube link even if the bottom line (in most browsers, or a separate field) says so, then the implication is that you do not trust any new link, no matter how authenticated it is - only those links that you know from before. That would limit your web browsing down to what I would consider useless. It may be sufficient for you, though!
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
Perhaps another interpretation of the fine gentleman's statement is he considers viewing people playing w/ their food a not pleasurable experience. "... as likely as lightning striking a leprechaun whilst riding a unicorn."
-
Fair enough if you reject any link to YouTube. I never heard of malware spread by ordinary YouTube watching, but I may be ignorant. If what you intend to say is that 'I have against YouTube in general, and I will not support it by navigating to it', you are of course welcome to - but you draw much more attention to YouTube that way, making people a lot more aware of it. Either you should state why you refuse to watch YouTube movies, or people will as 'Why not? There is no reason for your rejection'. Besides: I could of course repeatedly state that my favorite hobby is to not collect stamps. Who would care about what I do not do? Who would care about your not watching a YouTube movie? If you do not trust it to be a YouTube link even if the bottom line (in most browsers, or a separate field) says so, then the implication is that you do not trust any new link, no matter how authenticated it is - only those links that you know from before. That would limit your web browsing down to what I would consider useless. It may be sufficient for you, though!
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
no no no - that was not my point! :) I am not going to watch a video named Techno Melon. Something is just wrong with that. :laugh: <--- see? :-D
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
-
Perhaps another interpretation of the fine gentleman's statement is he considers viewing people playing w/ their food a not pleasurable experience. "... as likely as lightning striking a leprechaun whilst riding a unicorn."
-
no no no - that was not my point! :) I am not going to watch a video named Techno Melon. Something is just wrong with that. :laugh: <--- see? :-D
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
I agree. I am a depression baby and was taught to never, ever, waste or play with food. I still don't. During the war: "clean your plate, the children in Europe are starving". Not sure of the correlation. (I didn't click the link either, nothing to do with security)
>64 It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
-
I agree. I am a depression baby and was taught to never, ever, waste or play with food. I still don't. During the war: "clean your plate, the children in Europe are starving". Not sure of the correlation. (I didn't click the link either, nothing to do with security)
>64 It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
If you watch the YT movie from The Vegetable Orchestra (I gave the link in an earlier post), you'll see that the food isn't wasted: After the concert, they cut up their instruments and boil a vegetable soup to be served to the audience. I guess that is more that what can be said about most Halloween pumpkins.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
-
no no no - that was not my point! :) I am not going to watch a video named Techno Melon. Something is just wrong with that. :laugh: <--- see? :-D
Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.
charlieg wrote:
no no no - that was not my point! :) I am not going to watch a video named Techno Melon. Something is just wrong with that. :laugh: <--- see? :-D
So watch the video referenced from the post you were replying to :-)
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.