...do not reply " Google it"....
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
Google it. The lounge has its own rules, don't blame me.
-
Google it. The lounge has its own rules, don't blame me.
The rant is a perfectly valid post for the lounge. I am not blaming, only correcting, you :)
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
jana_hus wrote:
Am I wrong?
No, you are not. Still... there is a lot of times where the poster gives the impression of not having done efford with the issue or even writing the question. I am not telling your case is this case, only that, for me that's a perfectly valid situation to answer with it.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
jana_hus wrote:
it would not make any difference anyway.
So stop whining and move on.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
I can't speak for everyone else, but IMO the problem is... you refused to stop asking programming questions the lounge and you don't construct posts coherently. I'm not sure if English is your native language or not (says you live in the US on your profile), but if people can't make heads or tails out of your posts without needing a cryptogram decoder, it generally doesn't end well. And I'm not saying there's no merit to wishing for a better quality of replies to questions. But certainly, two wrongs don't make a right. That doesn't mean you can't do better at articulating your questions.
Jeremy Falcon
-
Unless I am way off in the left field , mistaken, did "Code project" instructions "how to reply" included " do not reply with "Google it" , the OP probably already did that"... Am I wrong? Please JUST confirm - there are more pleasant things in life than to dwell on something which cannot be rectified. Of course for challenged , hard to hear "contributor" , it would not make any difference anyway.
-
I can't speak for everyone else, but IMO the problem is... you refused to stop asking programming questions the lounge and you don't construct posts coherently. I'm not sure if English is your native language or not (says you live in the US on your profile), but if people can't make heads or tails out of your posts without needing a cryptogram decoder, it generally doesn't end well. And I'm not saying there's no merit to wishing for a better quality of replies to questions. But certainly, two wrongs don't make a right. That doesn't mean you can't do better at articulating your questions.
Jeremy Falcon
no , I am not native English person and (if you read) the forum rules they are pretty explicit , clear about how to respond to apparently non English speaking person. And furthermore - there is something in "rules" to help and not to make the poster feel stupid...( it may be OK for you to accept "Google it" , but if that is THE ONLY reply I keep getting from specific "contributor" it makes me feel stupid and unwelcome ) But you comment is in-line with "it is users fault", hence the introduction was , IMHO, just " empty filler ". But is it your choise , style to post and my reaction ,reply to it should be my choice and OK. (But from my experience here it is risky for me ti post this) "
-
I can't speak for everyone else, but IMO the problem is... you refused to stop asking programming questions the lounge and you don't construct posts coherently. I'm not sure if English is your native language or not (says you live in the US on your profile), but if people can't make heads or tails out of your posts without needing a cryptogram decoder, it generally doesn't end well. And I'm not saying there's no merit to wishing for a better quality of replies to questions. But certainly, two wrongs don't make a right. That doesn't mean you can't do better at articulating your questions.
Jeremy Falcon
You are native english speaker and sometimes I do not understand what you write either :rolleyes: ;P :laugh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
You are native english speaker and sometimes I do not understand what you write either :rolleyes: ;P :laugh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Touché :laugh: :laugh:
Jeremy Falcon
-
no , I am not native English person and (if you read) the forum rules they are pretty explicit , clear about how to respond to apparently non English speaking person. And furthermore - there is something in "rules" to help and not to make the poster feel stupid...( it may be OK for you to accept "Google it" , but if that is THE ONLY reply I keep getting from specific "contributor" it makes me feel stupid and unwelcome ) But you comment is in-line with "it is users fault", hence the introduction was , IMHO, just " empty filler ". But is it your choise , style to post and my reaction ,reply to it should be my choice and OK. (But from my experience here it is risky for me ti post this) "
Seems to me you enjoy arguing with those who could help. I have read the rules and you are correct about being patient with non-native English speakers, but your incoherency has less to do with your English and more to do with lack of effort. That's why you get "google it" answers. You put zero effort into the question. ALSO YOUR ATTITUDE COMES ACROSS EASY. I can't imagine ever working with some as argumentative as you. SO... YA KNOW... MAYBE YOU SHOULD LISTEN TO WHAT I'M SAYING.
Jeremy Falcon