Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Save water: delete your emails!

Save water: delete your emails!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
9 Posts 8 Posters 479 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriffO Offline
    OriginalGriff
    wrote last edited by OriginalGriff
    #1

    It's not April 1st today is it?
    Apparently, the UK government is suggesting that my email archive is causing a drought ... https://www.theverge.com/science/758275/drought-delete-files-email-data-center-water-uk?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-gb

    Can't see it myself, I suspect that removing teenager Gentelemens Special Interest materrial woudl free up more space and thus save a lot more water!

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
    "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      RichardM
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      We could probably save a lot more by deleting politicians.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • Sander RosselS Offline
        Sander RosselS Offline
        Sander Rossel
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        I probably don't have to explain this, but it's not your few emails, it's the billions of emails people (needlessly) store (yes, I'm fun at parties).

        That being said, I think there are far better methods to save water than deleting emails, like, and I'm going out on a limb here, taking shorter showers and reusing towels.
        Ok, now that I'm reading my own suggestion I think that's crazy talk and we should stick to the email thing ;)

        code-witchC 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

          I probably don't have to explain this, but it's not your few emails, it's the billions of emails people (needlessly) store (yes, I'm fun at parties).

          That being said, I think there are far better methods to save water than deleting emails, like, and I'm going out on a limb here, taking shorter showers and reusing towels.
          Ok, now that I'm reading my own suggestion I think that's crazy talk and we should stick to the email thing ;)

          code-witchC Offline
          code-witchC Offline
          code-witch
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Sander-Rossel You got this in my head "Sycophants is on the prowl so I don't need to do laundry
          I'll dry myself with paper towels"

          It's from a song called Syrup by Aesop Rock, and it's basically about agoraphobia.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            dandy72
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Well, I tend to move the entire content of my mailbox to a local PST every couple of months until there's nothing left.

            Besides, I thought the claim was that all free email services did when deleting an email was to mark it as deleted and they still held it internally?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R RichardM

              We could probably save a lot more by deleting politicians.

              P Online
              P Online
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              I don't know any politicians who drink water.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                I don't know any politicians who drink water.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                jeron1
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @PIEBALDconsult There's a lot of water in KoolAid.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                  It's not April 1st today is it?
                  Apparently, the UK government is suggesting that my email archive is causing a drought ... https://www.theverge.com/science/758275/drought-delete-files-email-data-center-water-uk?utm_source=firefox-newtab-en-gb

                  Can't see it myself, I suspect that removing teenager Gentelemens Special Interest materrial woudl free up more space and thus save a lot more water!

                  P Online
                  P Online
                  PIEBALDconsult
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Be sure to backwash your phone lines periodically as well.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    trønderen
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    How much water would be saved if I throw away all my archived paper mail? Does it make a difference if the mail is handwritten / written with an old style typewriter, or a printout of an electronic mail?

                    Regardless of how the letter was produced, I cannot understand how and why my paper mail archive cabinet consumes more water by holding a higher number of letters.

                    Or ... Now that I come to think of it: Why would my backup disk - offline, of course, as any proper backup should be - consume more water if the bits stored on it forms a number of email entries, compared to the bit pattern left by a proper erase program that fills disk pages being with a shredding pattern?

                    If the disk pages are not overwritten by a shredding pattern but simply linked over to the disk's freelist, how much would the disk drink then? As much as before mail cleanup, or reduced to the amount you could expect if they were filled with a shredding pattern?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups