Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation

Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
13 Posts 6 Posters 788 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Rage
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @PIEBALDconsult said in Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation:

    I work primarily at the command line

    Wow, not only is CodeProject back, but it also made a jump back in time of 40 years :-p

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Rage
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      On a serious note, this is indeed poorly documented. Here a good source :
      https://www.robvanderwoude.com/condexec.php

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        dandy72
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        Personally I never fully got the hang of cmd.exe's (or even DOS's) quirks and generally shy away from batch file-type of syntax.

        When PowerShell came along I figured there was no point in trying to learn cmd.exe's idiosyncrasies.

        PS isn't without its own quirks, but at least in most cases, if I sit back and think about them, I end up agreeing they make sense and move on.

        And PS is a lot more powerful. And if that's not enough, you can tap into .NET.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • D dandy72

          Personally I never fully got the hang of cmd.exe's (or even DOS's) quirks and generally shy away from batch file-type of syntax.

          When PowerShell came along I figured there was no point in trying to learn cmd.exe's idiosyncrasies.

          PS isn't without its own quirks, but at least in most cases, if I sit back and think about them, I end up agreeing they make sense and move on.

          And PS is a lot more powerful. And if that's not enough, you can tap into .NET.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote last edited by PIEBALDconsult
          #5

          I'm not a fan of PowerShell.
          I just looked at how to spawn a process in PowerShell. It looks like there are a few ways, but I would likely still call cmd.exe from it, the other options don't seem to do what I need and I don't have a need to learn new tricks.

          The first time I used PowerShell, it was because someone gave me a script to demonstrate the use of an API for some third-party software. Once I confirmed that it worked, I rewrote it in C# -- which meant I had a lot more control.

          There was another time I wrote a PowerShell script to test whether or not some remote systems were healthy, but I simply called it from the command line.

          Graeme_GrantG 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            I never liked CMD or PowerShell; the only terminals that made sense were from the Linux environments — bash, etc. However, the Windows Terminal did bring me a little closer to the terminal world on Windows. Otherwise, I prefer to use Linux when I must use a terminal.

            Right tool for the right job. :)

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              I'm not a fan of PowerShell.
              I just looked at how to spawn a process in PowerShell. It looks like there are a few ways, but I would likely still call cmd.exe from it, the other options don't seem to do what I need and I don't have a need to learn new tricks.

              The first time I used PowerShell, it was because someone gave me a script to demonstrate the use of an API for some third-party software. Once I confirmed that it worked, I rewrote it in C# -- which meant I had a lot more control.

              There was another time I wrote a PowerShell script to test whether or not some remote systems were healthy, but I simply called it from the command line.

              Graeme_GrantG Offline
              Graeme_GrantG Offline
              Graeme_Grant
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @PIEBALDconsult said in Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation:

              The first time I used PowerShell, it was because someone gave me a script to demonstrate the use of an API for some third-party software. Once I confirmed that it worked, I rewrote it in C# -- which meant I had a lot more control.

              You can use C# directly in a powershell script!

              Add-Type -TypeDefinition @"
              public class HelloWorld {
                  public static string SayHello(string name) {
                      return "Hello, " + name + "!";
                  }
              }
              "@
              
              # Use the C# method from PowerShell
              $result = [HelloWorld]::SayHello("PIEBALDconsult")
              Write-Output $result
              

              “I fear not the man who has practised 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practised one kick 10,000 times.” - Bruce Lee.

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Graeme_GrantG Graeme_Grant

                @PIEBALDconsult said in Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation:

                The first time I used PowerShell, it was because someone gave me a script to demonstrate the use of an API for some third-party software. Once I confirmed that it worked, I rewrote it in C# -- which meant I had a lot more control.

                You can use C# directly in a powershell script!

                Add-Type -TypeDefinition @"
                public class HelloWorld {
                    public static string SayHello(string name) {
                        return "Hello, " + name + "!";
                    }
                }
                "@
                
                # Use the C# method from PowerShell
                $result = [HelloWorld]::SayHello("PIEBALDconsult")
                Write-Output $result
                
                P Offline
                P Offline
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                That is interesting. I'll have to try it.

                I had a boss who favored Python* (over C#) because you deploy the source code (to a server or other remote system) rather than a compiled executable (a point of view I understand, but disagree with).

                I have/had an idea of writing a framework which would run on a remote system and compile C# code which has been deployed to it in an as-needed basis. Now what you tell me is that PowerShell already does that, so I'm glad I didn't waste my time working on it.

                • He is one of many people I have encountered who think Python can do anything all on its own, without acknowledging that Python often relies on packages written in other (better / more powerful) general purpose languages. Which is one of its strengths, as a glue language.
                Graeme_GrantG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  That is interesting. I'll have to try it.

                  I had a boss who favored Python* (over C#) because you deploy the source code (to a server or other remote system) rather than a compiled executable (a point of view I understand, but disagree with).

                  I have/had an idea of writing a framework which would run on a remote system and compile C# code which has been deployed to it in an as-needed basis. Now what you tell me is that PowerShell already does that, so I'm glad I didn't waste my time working on it.

                  • He is one of many people I have encountered who think Python can do anything all on its own, without acknowledging that Python often relies on packages written in other (better / more powerful) general purpose languages. Which is one of its strengths, as a glue language.
                  Graeme_GrantG Offline
                  Graeme_GrantG Offline
                  Graeme_Grant
                  wrote last edited by Graeme_Grant
                  #9

                  @PIEBALDconsult said in Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation:

                  I had a boss who favored Python* (over C#) because you deploy the source code (to a server or other remote system) rather than a compiled executable (a point of view I understand, but disagree with).

                  Have you seen the new support for C# apps that run with the coming DotNet tool? No projects just C# with 'dotnet run' - This should blow your boss' mind. C# can do what Python can do...

                  “I fear not the man who has practised 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practised one kick 10,000 times.” - Bruce Lee.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan

                    I never liked CMD or PowerShell; the only terminals that made sense were from the Linux environments — bash, etc. However, the Windows Terminal did bring me a little closer to the terminal world on Windows. Otherwise, I prefer to use Linux when I must use a terminal.

                    Right tool for the right job. :)

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    Well, neither Windows nor Linux is the right tool, but they're what's currently popular.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Graeme_GrantG Graeme_Grant

                      @PIEBALDconsult said in Microsoft has caused me sooo much trouble over the years due to a bad piece of documentation:

                      I had a boss who favored Python* (over C#) because you deploy the source code (to a server or other remote system) rather than a compiled executable (a point of view I understand, but disagree with).

                      Have you seen the new support for C# apps that run with the coming DotNet tool? No projects just C# with 'dotnet run' - This should blow your boss' mind. C# can do what Python can do...

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote last edited by PIEBALDconsult
                      #11

                      Hadn't heard of it. I like compiling and deploying executables. But I'll give it a look.

                      Edit: I just tried it with my work laptop and I was unsuccessful. I'll have to try it at home. It's probably not something I'd use anyway.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jawadulhassan1810
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jawadulhassan1810
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          Yeah, Microsoft’s documentation can definitely be confusing at times. Good catch on the difference between &, &&, and ||—a lot of people miss how cmd.exe actually treats return codes. Thanks for breaking it down so clearly!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups