.net application without .net framework
-
No. There's a reason .NET applications are said to be managed code: it's managed by the CLR, just like Java is by the JVM, Visual Basic is by the VB runtime, etc. The .NET Framework MUST be installed to run ANY .NET application (regardless of what language the source code is in, since all compilers produce IL, except the MC++ which - in mixed mode - can embed native code into assemblies). See the following article for a pretty good view on the subject: http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/stories/2002/04/21/itsTheRuntimeStupid.html[^].
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.21 GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++ -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
-
C++
-
No. There's a reason .NET applications are said to be managed code: it's managed by the CLR, just like Java is by the JVM, Visual Basic is by the VB runtime, etc. The .NET Framework MUST be installed to run ANY .NET application (regardless of what language the source code is in, since all compilers produce IL, except the MC++ which - in mixed mode - can embed native code into assemblies). See the following article for a pretty good view on the subject: http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/stories/2002/04/21/itsTheRuntimeStupid.html[^].
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.21 GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++ -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Time to bookmark that link ;). I think his comment about C# possibly being the new VB is dead on. It's not TOTALLY the consumer's fault in my opinion. MS does a good job at hyping how easy this stuff is, and as a result people jump in head first :). That said, there's never a magic bullet that makes programming as easy as writing a Word document.
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins -
No. There's a reason .NET applications are said to be managed code: it's managed by the CLR, just like Java is by the JVM, Visual Basic is by the VB runtime, etc. The .NET Framework MUST be installed to run ANY .NET application (regardless of what language the source code is in, since all compilers produce IL, except the MC++ which - in mixed mode - can embed native code into assemblies). See the following article for a pretty good view on the subject: http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/stories/2002/04/21/itsTheRuntimeStupid.html[^].
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.21 GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++ -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Hmmm...I saw your reply to my reply, and responded. Now your reply is gone (did you move/delete it?) and my response got lost in some weird void. In any event, check this out if you get bored.
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins -
They claim that this will do it. Remotesoft Thank You Bo Hunter
-
www.dotgnu.org[^] leppie::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.