J4amieC wrote: Tried concatenating a string and an int recently? Yes, when testing his code - I wouldn't have done it, but when writing to the console it compiles and works. Try the code below! static void Main() { int i = 5; string s = "Test"; Console.WriteLine(s + i); Console.ReadKey(); } Dave

Why do you have 500 "Console.WriteLine" ?? Well not quite 500 but jeze, you still have quite a few! Use a single string, You seem to be in a class/new to programming so I'll help you with these:     1) No need to call write line 100 time unless you need to     2) The char '\n' is bad to use in .NET unlike some other other language's the new line char '\n' doesn't get converted by the compiler to the system's correct new line format. So there is a class called "Environment" which contains a "NewLine" property (the correct way to do a '\n' in .NET) which will decode to the correct new line string. Console.WriteLine("Welcome to The Quiz Program!{0}" + " You can be quizzed on any of the following operators:{0}" + "\\t1) %\\t(modulus, or 'remainder'){0}" + "\\t2) \*\\t(multiplication){0}" + "\\t3) /\\t(integer division){0}" + "\\t4) /%\\t(integer division & modulus in a combined challenge!)" + "{0}{0}Choice (1,2,3,or 4):", Environment.NewLine); -Spacix All your skynet questions[^] belong to solved

:doh: I read this post and that went right over my head. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

Honestly, if the material your teacher gave you doesn't give you a starting point, I'd approach some other students to work out if the problem is with you, or with the teacher. If the other students also don't know how to start, approach the teacher. If they do, then follow the advice given before, read your course materials, use google and then take a shot at it. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

Thanks :) Glad you like it! The basic answer is that we don't support object persistance through stored procs. The long answer is that we don't think it is necessary for a few reasons. Diamond Binding queries the database differently depending on what you are doing - say you are retrieving a Customer record, it may choose to bring back the Address object that Customer.Address references in one query by joining the table on. Additionally the query API (FindByProperty, etc) will obviously generate different queries. CRUD stored procedures would be less flexible and lead to worse performance for the query strategies that Diamond Binding uses. Generally speaking we provide a level of abstraction from the database so you don't have to worry about the query mechanics - as it says on the tin, we take over between the database and the domain objects :) Mark Churchill Director Dunn & Churchill Free Download: Diamond Binding: The simple, powerful, reliable, and effective data layer toolkit for Visual Studio.

When is your homework due? I have five others ahead of you needing "urgent" homework help. And there is no mention in your help wanted advertisment about how you are going to pay me to do your homework for you. Why is common sense not common? Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert. Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy Individuality is fine, as long as we do it together - F. Burns

*grin* that happens to me all the time. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

I'm only in 8th grade and I'm learning C# by myself. So shut up if you do not know.

Luc Pattyn wrote: why would you use doubles both in the API and inside the method, when the problem at hand is basically an integer one? Possible reasons: Because it was nearing midnight when I dug out this class that I wrote as I was learning C#. My gerbils wrote the code. Not all primes have yet been discovered - I may actually discover a non whole prime. (Embarassed clearing of throat :-O ) You always pass failure on the way to success.

Hellllooooooo. Hellloooooooo. Can you hear the wind whistling unhindered through the vast emptiness existing between your ears? It must be lonely for your last remaining braincell. Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before. My blog | My articles

I doubt that. I believe that the string constructor does something much less complicated than using a StringBuilder. It probably just allocates the memory needed for the string and fills it with the character. Also, the StringBuilder returns a finished string object, so it would be complicated to merge the string object being created with the string object returned from the StringBuilder. :) Experience is the sum of all the mistakes you have done.