I have never read about v-ware before .Now i will read about this and see if it fullfill my requirements. Thanks for your help

Try using the ASP.Net Wizard control first.

infact i have tried the same link as you have reffered , but it print currnt document not the document that is referenced in link

anilaabc wrote: I right clicked on my setupproject and click on project output option ,it opend a dialog project output group . it shows only content file option ,options like primary output etc are not there . I am not able to understand that what is your exact problem. Can you please give some more clarity on it. Thanks ~! Abhijit Jana | Codeproject MVP Web Site : abhijitjana.net Don't forget to click "Good Answer" on the post(s) that helped you.

When you postback dynamic controls will not be posted back. Do all UI generation in Pre_Init to have ViewState data embedded within the body. :) Abhishek Sur **Don't forget to click "Good Answer" if you like this Solution. My Latest Articles-->** Simplify Code Using NDepend Basics of Bing Search API using .NET Microsoft Bing MAP using Javascript

yes ,resolved thank you sir

Thank you ,I think autogenerate =true is the solution

I'm just guessing here, but it might be because it is counting the column headers as row[0]. Anyway, does it matter, just use the value returned by e.RowIndex. Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

reference u provide gives information of driver not device i need device name (i need all cammera names which are connceted with system) how it will possible?

One of the things you can do, is to cache the controls you have in the master page using OutputCache directive on top of the master page. That way all the controls in the master page are cached for whatever the time you want them to be. Bhaskara

Mark Salsbery wrote: I would really look at the design of the code. I second that. Twice. Mark Salsbery wrote: Nothing exposes bad multithread design like switching to a multi-core/multi-CPU machine Hear, hear. "It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote "High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown

anilaabc wrote: I Run aspnet_regiis command from .NET Framework Directory. C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727>aspnet_regiis -i and .net frame work 2.0 is installed Then what happened ? Reset IIS , open Inetmgr , open the properties of Virtual Directory of your application , Check ASP.NET version (it should be 2.0..) . Run the application . cheers, Abhijit CodeProject.Com MVP

thanks

Wow the cat is out, hence is alive: we should tell to Mr. Schroedinger... (or is the above another secret?) :-D If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

Just for a test, run "Task Manager" and check "Performance", does your CPU seem overloaded (100% CPU usage)? If so, check "Processes" and see if your process is the one consuming all the CPU time, if so, you have there a run away thread probably. Try putting a Sleep(1) (or maybe Sleep(0)?) in your thread (inside that while-loop) and check if anything changes. > The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < modified on Thursday, December 4, 2008 7:08 AM

thanks Mark

I think you didn't noticed.I modified the question and explained ...

:confused: :omg: :confused: What on earth are you trying to do? I mean that question very sincerely because you seem to have misunderstood the concept of multithreading completely. If you experience the thread to run at least once, you must be calling ::ResumeThread() from some code that you have not provided in this post, which suggests that there may be more to it than the code you've posted. What the code you provided does is create a thread suspended. When the thread resumes execution it will call the abc() function. In the same call chain ::SuspendThread() will be called and when ::ResumeThread() is called in order to let the thread resume execution, the thread will simply exit. That's why the "thread only runs once". For the rest of us to be able to help you as constructive as possible, please answer this: Why do you think you need multiple threads? "It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote "High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown