Finally. Thanks for that. It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it. ― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

While you have the information you need to explore AOP tools: very full-featured commercial, like PostSharp [^] ; open-source, like Fody [^]; and, others mentioned on this thread ... I wonder if there are other, simpler, techniques ... not based on Attributes and behind-the-scenes modification of Assemblies/IL code ... that could meet your needs ? These could include: use of #define compiler directives; run-time attaching/detaching EventHandlers. If you want to see examples of these methods, just ask. fyi: I use PostSharp, and it is an amazing tool-set. «Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot

Bastien Vandamme wrote: Microsoft please help. You example are wrong Have you told them?

All my other routes are working fine. GelAll is working, Post is working. I don't get it. Controller name is Classes. Only route that include the key of Booking are not working. What is the logic behind this? using Microsoft.AspNet.OData; using Microsoft.AspNet.OData.Routing; using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc; using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore; using Oyg.Domain.DataTypes; using System; using System.Linq; using System.Threading.Tasks; namespace Oyg.Api.Controllers { public partial class ClassesController : ODataController { /// /// Get all bookings. Get the class reservation queue. /// /// [HttpGet] [ODataRoute("Classes({classId})/Bookings")] public async Task GetBookings([FromODataUri] Guid classId) { return Ok(await _context.Bookings .Where(y => y.Class.Id == classId) .ToListAsync()); } /// /// Get a specific booking /// /// \[HttpGet\] \[ODataRoute("Classes({classId})/Bookings({bookingId})")\] public async Task GetBooking(\[FromODataUri\] Guid classId, \[FromODataUri\] Guid bookingId) { var @class = await \_context.Classes.FirstOrDefaultAsync(y => y.Id == classId); if (@class == null) { return NotFound(); } var booking = \_context.Bookings.Where(y => y.Class.Id == classId && y.Id == bookingId); if (!booking.Any()) { return NotFound(); } return Ok(SingleResult.Create(booking)); } /// /// Add a booking reservation in a class /// /// /// \[HttpPost\] \[ODataRoute("Classes({classKey})/Bookings")\] public async Task PostBooking(\[FromODataUri\] Guid classKey, \[FromBody\] Booking booking) { if (!ModelState.IsValid) { return BadRequest(ModelState); } var @class = \_context.Classes .FindAsync(classKey); if (@class == null) { return NotFound(); } booking.Id = Guid.NewGuid(); booking.Position = \_context.

WEB API should return status code in the header and any content in the body. For example, if the request is successful then set the status code to 200 in the header and send the result in the body. If the request is failed , then set the corresponding status code in the header ( for example 500 etc...) and send additional information in the body.

The other response is good. However if in fact this is only for you, then it is just going to be easier if you do exactly what you suggested, recalculate each month for the previous month. Creating a new table each month would not be a good solution.

If you want to log every request, then use the IIS log. That will include requests which might not be mapped to the Web API pipeline, and therefore wouldn't be picked up by a DelegatingHandler or action filter. If you just want to log the Web API requests, then either a DelegatingHandler or an action filter will work. Neither is an "old" feature. However, if you want to log the request and response bodies as a single entry, the DelegatingHandler would be the better choice. protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken) { var response = await base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken); await LogAsync(request, response); return response; } If you just want trace logs for your code, have a look at Tracing in ASP.NET Web API 2[^]. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

so how do you find the most reputable and fastest IT consulting companies on Google? geometry dash free

B413 wrote: I would like to test the AlwaysOn Availability Groups functionality of SQL server to validate or not if this solution is good for my company. That would depend more if it actually does what you're buying it for. If it would not, it would fail as a product. B413 wrote: Is it possible to test this for free? There's a description to how you set it up on MSDN[^]. Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

Go for the gusto; includes screen capture: Download Microsoft Expression Encoder 4 with Service Pack 2 (SP2) from Official Microsoft Download Center[^]

Hello, There are some ways to write one application for three mobile platforms (Windows Phone, iOS and Android). You must remember that those solutions are not good enough and you will never achieve as good application quality as writing it natively. You can write common code for logic, but the main problem is with design and some functionality points that are specific for each platform. You can try solutions I presented below: 1) Xamarin Forms: https://xamarin.com/platform[^] 2) Apache Crodova: https://xamarin.com/platform[^] 3) Ionic: http://ionicframework.com/[^]

This link can help you to decide - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj823172(v=vs.110).aspx[^] I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)

I usually only set database information in the config file, the rest goes in the database. I define it as key/value pairs, but also include "category" and/or machine/module information to be able to filter the necessary. In addition you could add a "user" filter for settings that a user can change. I also add a description on what the key/value pair is for. my two cents. PS: web services/WCF remain a major drag in this... V. (MQOTD rules and previous solutions)

Post your question in the Articles forum and one of the administrators will help you.

Ewebguru works passionately to deliver high-quality web hosting solutions for our clients at highly affordable prices. Our servers are of enterprise-grade hardware delivering highly reliable web hosting services to our clients. We have a dedicated team of experts that monitor our servers 24/7 ensuring that you enjoy hassle-free service.

No#1 Option: ERwin Community Edition No#2 Option: Toad Data Modeler freeware edition No#3 Option: Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler. In [free] world, nothing else come closer to this.

Really depends on what you're trying to test... for me, there's nothing like having a PC with multi-boot setup for testing. Why? ...because depending on the software that you're testing, if you find issues in the Virtual Machine, then you have to determine whether the issue comes from the virtualization process or if it's a real bug within your code. You also tend to spend a lot of time setting up a virtual system the way you need it, so IMO, for testing, it's worth it in the long run to just get a system you can boot into multiple OS's. I had a single, cheap server that I had set up to boot into three different versions of Windows Server, worked great for testing and I never had a doubt whether any extra layers were causing an issue. Of course, virtualization has its benefits.... you always have a clean copy of the OS running (if that's what you want/need) and you can easily change OS's with little downtime. Cloud based solutions tend to pretty much be virtual machines too.. so the only added benefit is the hosting is managed by someone else. Recurring costs are the drawback. Plus depending on your application, you may not want it hosted on the cloud, where someone else's sloppy security might affect you down the road.

System.web.ui system.io system.data system.data.sqlclient system.configuration :)

But neither are enough of an abstraction if you still know how and where the objects get stored.