X| Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

X| Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

Indeed, don't force your customer to install sql express. I agree to PIEBALDconsult post. Maybe its the easiest way to create your installation, but its the wrong way. Your installation should get the required data (connection settings etc.), check the connection, then it should install the database. If the connection fails, cancel the setup.

hi, I am not sure how to call method every time you add to a delegate. Why don't you call the method after the delegate is added . e.g MyFunction += new DoItDelegate(DoItFunction); RegisterTheNewMethod();

public delegate void DoItDelegate(int i);........{DoItDelegate MyFunction;MyFunction += new DoItDelegate(DoItFunction); }public void DoItFunction(int i){ //Do Domthing}

Wes Aday wrote: named pipes That sounds right. Wes Aday wrote: have both projects use the same data structures. That's not real easy; each app has its own app domain.

My experience with this stuff is limited, from what I've done in the past I would say: 1. you need to add references to all the managed DLL files you need at compile time, hence use CompilerParameters.ReferencedAssemblies.Add(dllFileName) 2. you can't use dynamic classes and methods as usual; you need reflection code for every instance and method, such as Assembly.CreateInstance() and Type.GetMember() and MethodInfo.Invoke(); all of which is cumbersome. Are you sure you need it? You didn't tell much about the real functionality of your app. FWIW: I expect you can reduce the hassle by having a fixed interface that works like a contract for your dynamic class; once you get an instance (still through reflection), you should be able to invoke methods in the normal way as long as they are part of that interface. :) Luc Pattyn I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!

Thanks for your help.

Perhaps Action[^] or Func[^] is what you need only two letters away from being an asset

RPN[^]

The chances are you can't, unless the CPU motherboard manufacturer has provided the info via WMI, which is unlikely - most don't so there is no simple, generic way to do it. If you aren't after a generic solution, then you will have to look at the manufacturer of your specific hardware for details (if they give them!) [edit]Monday morning disease - replace CPU with motherboard. Ooops![/edit] No trees were harmed in the sending of this message; however, a significant number of electrons were slightly inconvenienced. This message is made of fully recyclable Zeros and Ones modified on Monday, September 7, 2009 5:17 AM

If you were to fix a dozen or so syntax errors and to run the code, you would get 100, as it should be. The type of b is B, and the base of B is A. BTW: don't use verbs in property names, they don't belong; they do in method names, not in property names. :) Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Show formatted code inside PRE tags, and give clear symptoms when describing a problem.

hi, i have been playing with you code. i tried with threading and other methods. creating endless/limited loops. again .... whitout System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(20 * 1000); or MessageBox you code want compile, wel it doesn't produce an executable. i have achieved 99% cpu usage on a intel 9450. i think this is a very lousy methode off programming. to get something valueble on this methode of programming. static void Main() { begin: if (!testLoop()) { // System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1 \* 1000); // MessageBox.Show("new", "", MessageBoxButtons.OK, MessageBoxIcon.Information); goto begin; } } private static bool testLoop() { while (baba != 101) { //Thread.Sleep(1 \* 100); baba++; } baba = 0; return false; } this code comsumes 25% cpu usages and is self sustainable. but it doesn't produce an executable. but if you uncomment System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1 * 1000); it wil compile but terribly remove the realtime feeling. it's like imitating the Assembler Bad = knowing 2 much

Thanks for your answer. I solved the problem in this way: 1. I create New Attribute(MyAttribute) that contain string called "MyFunctionTextHeader". 2. Every method have an MyAttribute : [MyAttribute("My function description)")] public bool MyFunc(int num) { .... } 3. when i have "MethodInfo" name mi i write this line: string TextHeader = ((MyAttribute)mi.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(MyAttribute), false)\[0\]).MyFunctionTextHeader; and that solve my problem.

Thanks Dave ;)

check whether save button saves the records in the database... If it is not updated in the database then check your insert query... If the records are saved in the database then rebind the grid again so that the database updates will reflect in your page.... :) Padmanabhan My Articles: Articles[^] My latest Article: Word Automation[^]

I Found the Solution, it's very simple, you neet to send the instance to the CreatreDelegate. in my case : VFC.ValidSystemFunction += (ValidSystem)Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(ValidSystem),VFC, mi);

I agree, cpp rules! :) http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/[^] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-2.95.3/cpp_1.html#SEC1[^] In grad school, the assembler that I did (written in C) could do macros. How? By first running the assembler source code through cpp. :cool: Plus, the manual for cpp was already written. Double win! :) Heck, the smart engineer doesn't reinvent the wheel when it's just sitting there next to him/her! :) ___ Joe

Thanks. I tryed some other methods but in the end i just use this function : private void InsertThisStudent(Student std, List<Student> List) { for (int i = 0; i < List.Count; i++) { if (std.CompareTo(List\[i\]) < 0) { List.Insert(i, std); return; } } //If this is the last one List.Add(std); } thanks :-)