Hi led mike, Thanks for your help. I was able to create a seperate function and delegate in place of his delegate code. Still don't understand what exactly his code does, but I got it to work some how. Thanks again eatwork

To be honest, I'd assume being bound to the database would be the default, and most examples on the web would assume this approach Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog

sorry, ignore the last post, starting to confuse myself. Thanks again eatwork

Thank you Asif for your reply. I guess I will have to find another method to compare two tables. eatwork

The only way to improve upon this is to not have 700 rows in your DataSet. You could requery the database for the smaller rowset, but that involves bugging the SQL Server again and transferring that data over the network again. Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

Hi Josh, Thanks for the reply, I was hoping there would be a better way to go about that, but I guess I will have to go through the subitems. Thanks eatwork

http://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2009/12/01/types-and-tuples-in-net-4.aspx[^]

Hello Joshua Quick, That worked perfectly. Thank you eatwork

Thanks for your quick response dave. You wouldn't happen to know how to get around the protection problems with the CollectionForm in VS2003 would you? Thank you. eatwork

Custom events are not available in VB 2003. David Anton www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com Instant C#: VB to C# converter Instant VB: C# to VB converter Instant C++: C# to C++ converter and VB to C++ converter Instant J#: VB to J# converter Clear VB: Cleans up VB.NET code Clear C#: Cleans up C# code

Thank you Christian for your reply, sorry it took me so long to reply. I will give your suggestion a try. eatwork