Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
E

EmergentComprehension

@EmergentComprehension
About
Posts
1
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • What do you think?
    E EmergentComprehension

    One take on this question could be "m_" vs "_". Either is good as they distinguish the scope/lifetime at a glance. Some people express a loathing for "m_", as its old hat. C++ & vb6 typically used some m_ or mvar or similar prefix. I was happy with that. Why change it? The point that many raised is either prefix is fine, so long as its consistent? So why oh why did it have to change?

    The Lounge question database sql-server com sysadmin
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups