Hi talked to 3 persons about what happen to my tips. They all agree with me on 4 points: - Peoples voting 1,2 or 3 should leave comment (with a minimum of character length) in order to ensure to give feedback to the author in order to let him know the reason and give him the opportunity to improve its article. - Due to anonymous nature of voting (now without comment) clearly make it easier to vote anything. - A system that let vote down so easily let room for possibility to discredit good article in its early life and lead to improper perception of usefulness. - Peoples that receive bad vote will stop writing. In general, it is fine. But a good potential writer fooled by wrong vote in its first articles could decide to stop writing and it could lead to many good articles being lost (if wrongly evaluated by some users). Although there is probably good reasons to not force people to comment when voting, you absolutely not convinced me that it is reasonable to let people vote down without any comment. I definitively find that removing this restriction is a very hard to understand decision. Thanks, Eric
