Erik Hammar wrote: Maybe I'm supposed to parse/load the file using some Javascript function? Maybe as a "Developer" you are supposed to find and "Read" Documentation[^] Having a clear understanding of fundamental concepts is key to being a capable developer. led mike

Hello, and thanks for your reply! I don't think it's the delete[] operator that is the problem right now. I print the pointer that I obtain with _aligned_malloc to the screen (in my overloaded operator new[]) and then print the pointer obtained by _using_ the the new[] operator, the latter being unaligned and pointing to my actual data... so something happens between the aligned allocation in the overloaded new[] function and my assignment of the new pointer; e.g: Pointer with _aligned_malloc = 0x00a40030 (aligned on 16-byte boundary). Pointer after assigning the final object with new[] = 0x00a40034 (not aligned). Even worse, the compiler seems to add extra extra info there in debug mode - no simple workaround, such as adding and subtracting 4 bytes to the address. So I need to be able to completely handle this on my own for my program to work... hasn't anybody programmed with SSE instructions and come across this problem? :(( The delete[] operator will be a later problem, correct allocation is the most important thing right now, so that the program doesn't crasch. :) Thanks

:-O ooops. me not read english too good no more.... Vertical, you say? How 'bout a table with height="100%" then? What a piece of work is man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable . . . and yet to me, what is this quintessence of dust? -- Hamlet, Act II, Scene ii.

Hello! I actually get a screen on both computers when the BIOS loads and after that windows, but when windows has loaded, the screen turns black... but i'll try anyway... thanks!

Yes it has, and I have to set it to PCI, for Windows to find the other card. =/

yeah, thats the one :) All I remember is that I was at university in Dundee and the cities other university does a games programming degree where you spend a whole lot of time working on them. They had a lab with about 50 of the things sitting in it :) was quite a site :D

Erik, I think you should not be complacent about the error being removed. We still don't know why it crashed before. A bug that has been hidden but not removed can be very deadly. Good luck. Nish Sonork ID 100.9786 voidmain www.busterboy.org If you don't find me on CP, I'll be at Bob's HungOut

I suggest you to check your return value from your Blt-call. Or perhaps are you tring to flip surfaces? -

Try SetButtonInfo(). There is also a class created by Christian Graus and Masoud Samimi here which can change the bitmap of a toolbar button with a transparent color. -Raffi [A Sign of Boredom](about:<marquee scrollamount=10><TABLE STYLE=filter:glow(color=black strength=5)><font size=10 face='american uncial' color=blue><br><br><br>Raffi)

Use Hot and Cold bitmaps See sample here http://www.codeproject.com/docking/toolbar\_hotbuttons.asp

Thanks!

I do it in Win32 like this: ::SetFocus (editControl); ::SendMessage (editControl, EM_SETSEL, (WPARAM)length, (LPARAM)length); ::SendMessage (editControl, EM_REPLACESEL, 0, (LPARAM) ((LPSTR) str.c_str())); I'm sure the MFC class for a rich edit will have methods so you don't need to send messages like this. The basic idea is make the cursor select the end position of the text in there, and then replace the selection ( which is really a caret at the end of the line ) with the text you want to append. length obviously equals the length of the text already there. Christian After all, there's nothing wrong with an elite as long as I'm allowed to be part of it!! - Mike Burston Oct 23, 2001

Read about the SetSystemCursor in MSDN

Thanks a lot!

_gcvt() should do the trick (at least for 32-bit numbers) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

I can't think of a single call you can make, but there are lots of 'points of interest'. First tip, don't sort an array of strings - sort a contiguous array of pointers to the strings. This means whatever shifting you do just involves moving bits of the array around, not reallocating strings. With that in place, there are standard sorting routines you can use. The venerable qsort from the C library works great, though it requires you to set up a 'global' callback. Maybe this could be a static member in C++ if you want to mix. Inside the comparison callback, its up to you to decide what the order will be - retuning essentially what a strcmp or stricmp returns. It turns out that there is more than one implementation for the string comparison functions in VC - there is straight C code, and there is much faster 286 code in the Crt\Intel include dir. (I say '286 code' because I think some of this could be even faster with the string ops of a 386 + proc when dealing with big strings). If you've got control over what proc you are targeting, even a basic framework like this can be way fast, depending of course on the size and similarity of the strings. STL gurus will probably flame me for this, but it is durn quick! :)