Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
E

estump

@estump
About
Posts
1
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Has the time come for development on a virtual machine?
    E estump

    We used VMs for development at my last job - the whole IT department for the most part had one - well over 100 developers, QA, DBAs and BAs, plus VM servers for development/QA. For the most part, they worked out pretty well as far as speed and performance are concerned. Reliability was an issue for the first few months. Occasionally a VM would lock up or you would not be able to logon to your VM and you'd have to have the helpdesk re-start it. We did lose a few and have to re-create them, but that was the company's fault for going ahead and using them before the backup/recovery process was tested and in place. The only real issue I saw as a developer was when we used VMs as servers (win2k3 and win2k8) for SQL Server or BizTalk or any of those types of development tools (except IIS - those ran fine). These ran REALLY slow and it didn't take much to lock them up. Unless you are in a position to allocate alot of resources (2GB RAM or more, CPU -??) to these, I would not use them as day-to-day servers, or at least be prepared to to allocate the necessary resources to them.

    The Lounge java asp-net linux hosting testing
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups