Be very careful when using HID directly, strange things may happen. I remember a colleague of mine who experimented with a Philips DPM 9620 dictation device. Suddenly, it did not work correctly anymore, and insisted in being a Philips DPM 9370 (a far cheaper model). We were not able to treat that personality disorder...

Well i've resolved it. By setting the following properties, it no longer causes the undesired effect. FullRowSelect = true; HeaderStyle = NonClickable; HideSelection = false; MultiSelect = false;

Gavin Roberts wrote: I am using Socket.Connect to connect. Ok but have you "read" the documentation[^] You are expecting certain behavior based on "what" if you haven't read the documentation? Just guessing?

You've become slightly mixed up in what you need the interface to be. When a generic states where T : ... you are indicating that the type T will implement the interface. Also, you have used a generic list and then hardcoded the type in the iterator. To be honest, you possibly don't need to expose your class as generic because you have a specific non-generic need here. What you could do is declare a List<...> member as a private member and then use your own methods to add to it. If you definitely want to go the generic route here, this is a sample that I have just knocked up. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Text; namespace TestIterator { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { RequestItemCollection<Request> coll = new RequestItemCollection<Request>(); Request req = new Request(); req.Status = RequestStatus.Open; coll.Add(req); req = new Request(); req.Status = RequestStatus.Open; coll.Add(req); System.Console.WriteLine("Open count = {0}", coll.OpenCount); Console.ReadLine(); } } public class RequestItemCollection<T> : List<T>, IEnumerable<T> where T: IStatus { #region IEnumerable<T> Members IEnumerator<T> IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator() { for (int i = 0; i < this.Count; i++) yield return this[i]; } #endregion #region IEnumerable Members System.Collections.IEnumerator System.Collections.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { throw new Exception("The method or operation is not implemented."); } #endregion public int OpenCount { get { return StatusCount(RequestStatus.Open); } } public int Closed { get { return StatusCount(RequestStatus.Closed); } } private int StatusCount(RequestStatus status) { int count = 0; foreach (T item in this) { if (item.Status == status) count++; } return count; } } public enum RequestStatus { Open, Closed, Pending } public interface IStatus { RequestStatus Status { get; set; } } public class Request : IStatus { private RequestStatus _status; #region IStatus Members public RequestStatus Status { get { return _status; } set { _stat

DatagridView1.Rows(0).Selected = False

Anyone?

I've managed this before with Telnet as Ethereal has support to decode Telnet Neg commands but I cannot find anything to suggest what is being used apart from TCP. If I use a Stream and TcpClient I can connect but I do not receive anything even if I send the packet that is being sent via the software. I've tried looking all over, it seems that the manufacture can not be found anywhere. Gav

THANK YOU! I knew it would be simple, but I didn't think it was THAT simple.

hi try to visit this links: http://www.carlosag.net/Tools/WebChart[^] http://www.carlosag.net/Tools/WebChart/samples.aspx[^] Tamimi - Code Tamimi - Code

Okay, i think i know the error now. You want the value 81 to be on the top of the graphic (almost y = 0??). if so, the problem is the height calculation. add 2 variables int dlHeight = int dsHeight = just replace this piece of code spacer_height = (height/maxCount); // amount of space between numbers (x axis) int tempHeight = parentHeight; // temp storage int modCheck = Isqrt(maxCount); // gets square root of the maxcount for(int i = 0; i < maxCount; i++) { if((i%modCheck)==0) // Space Saver { g.DrawLine(Gray, 50, tempHeight-25, width+25, tempHeight-25); // draws guide line g.DrawString(i.ToString(),new Font("Verdana", 7), Brushes.Black, 5, tempHeight-32); // draws int value } tempHeight = (tempHeight-spacer_height); // calculate next location for guide line and int value } with this one int tempHeight = parentHeight; // temp storage // These variables are new int sqrtMaxCount = Isqrt(maxCount); int rowHeight = height / sqrtMaxCount; for(int i = 0; i < sqrtMaxCount; i++) { // Try to check the calculation... its simpler than before and therefore should be understandable... g.DrawLine(Gray, 50, tempHeight-rowHeight, width+25, tempHeight-rowHeight); g.DrawString(i.ToString(),new Font("Verdana", 7), Brushes.Black, 5, tempHeight-rowHeight-7); // -7 because it was the difference between the relative Line and String Y value. tempHeight -= rowHeight; // This has changed a little bit. } in case you haven't found it out yourself yet :) I hope i didnt miss anything - currently i'm too lazy to write it myself but if it doesn't work i'll give it a try :) *edit* i forgot to change the condition for the for-loop... that would have turned out bad!

i dont know if there already is a function. if not try this: function roundup(int myval) { while (myval % 10 != 0) myval++; return myval; } usage: roundup(15); output: 20 if you want it to use the "real" rules, you will have to do it like this: function round(int myval) { int runs = 0; while ((myval + runs) % 10 != 0) { runs++; } if (runs < 5) return (myval - 10); return myval; } EDIT: the post before this one shows another solution which is much simpler and also looks better (since it's using inbuilt technology it probable will be faster too :))

Take a look at the Developer Express Scheduler[^]. Not cheap, but very good.