Your question sparked my interest some more, and I just found this information[^]. It's time for a new signature.

I had to play with video card setup to get it turned on ... even after adding the registry key ... Jammer My Blog | [Articles](http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles /MemberArticles.aspx?amid=4664921) | DMon - Download

OK -- I read through the replies and thought I'd add my 2cents worth. Silverlight is very good if you have a development staff that is more WinForm-centric but needs to do web development. There is a learning curve for XAML, but it is worth it. The learning curve for XAML is lessened if you also invest in Expression Blend. I actually feel that you cannot develop Silverlight without it, as it gives you the WYSIWYG interface that WinForm developers lean towards. The application is stateful even though it is a web app. It also follows much of the WCF construct but uses a lighter-weight framework. The idea is that even if a machine does not have the .NET framework on it, the Silverlight install will implement what is needed. The concept works well in theory but in practicallity you still need the Silverlight Toolkit which also has to be installed on the implementing machine, as this contains controls not in the Silverlight framework. The previous statement, as you can see, is both a pro and con of Silverlight deployment. Using controls outside of the framework requires some additional installations. I personally find Silverlight to be the easiest way to deploy web applications without having to learn the 4-inch-thick ASP.NET book. It keeps me more in my knowledge base of service/form development. I also find that I can do better UI development. For example, I have a customer maintenance program where the customer can have 3 different types of data to maintain. Using the Swivel behaviour, I was able to keep the UI VERY clean and gives the user a 'cool' UI experience. Clicking a button to view billing address swivels the customer address around to display the billing address. Clicking the return button swivels things back.

Hi Thanks for reply. They mentioned about how to create OOB. But my doubts is which path application are installed. since it is use full to click the shotcut inorder to execute the application again. Regards Gopal

Hi I faced the same problem. I assume the following in your case. 1 The module that your are building is a 64 bit binary. 2 You are trying to link your module with a 64 bit library. If above is the case, then you need to define an x64 Platform using the Configuration manager. Select the New option. In my case above was the problem and after defining a new configuration for x64, the problem is solved. Regards Nisam "Silence will create respect and dignity; justice and fair play will bring more friends; benevolence and charity will enhance prestige and position; courtesy will draw benevolence; service of mankind will secure leadership and good words will overcome powerful enemies" Ali (Peace be upon him)

Hi I am using DWORD to fine numerical value. I getting this value (2147500037) conver into Hex(80004005). it says that (#define OLE_E_NOTRUNNING _HRESULT_TYPEDEF_(0x80040005L));

public class CplusEnumExtension : whehre T:int { public CplusEnumExtension(int t) { enumT = t; } public bool Has(F findvalue) { return ((int)(object)enumT & (int)(object)findvalue)>0; } private int enumT=0; } In above code Has method i comparing int type that's why i expecting int from client side. Apartment from this I have implemented code below in C++ which client can use any type.(int, long etc) Is it possible in C# //EnumT->int,long,Ulong...0x0001; //Findvalue->ePDVE_DllError //usage : CEnumerationExtensions<ULONGLONG,ePileplandesign_verificationError> obj(errorcode); template ; class CEnumerationExtensions { public: CEnumerationExtensions(EnumT e) : enum_(e) {} public: bool Has(Findvalue value) { return ((enum_ & static_cast(value))>0); } private: EnumT enum_; };

Sorry, it took so long to get back to you, I don't visit the site every day. The reason I suggested that you consider how you want the 'function pointer' to be marshaled is that the COM Library is designed to use the RPC mechanism and a proxy/stub architecture to interact with other COM components, whether in the same process, in another thread in the same process, or even another process on a remote machine. I have no way of knowing how aware you are of COM internals,...so, I don't make any assumptions. The COM Library performs many operations that are invisible to the programmer when you make an activation request (for instance, CoCreateInstance or DllGetClassObject), depending on the server registration and how you configure your apartments. If it's an In-Process Server, you could, hypothetically, pass a 'function pointer' to another DLL in the same process, and the address would be accessible. In practice, this is a really dumb idea. The obvious question is: why not call the method directly? If the Com DLL is in another process address space, any virtual function pointer will be invalid (this will be true even if it's NOT a COM Dll). I'm assuming that you konw all this. Your question provides the very minimum of information, making it difficult to answer accurately. ...So, what's your point? If you want to define a 'function pointer', go ahead.

Gopal_Kanchana wrote: I didn't get your reply. Please clarify in detail Using Google will make you a developer with superpowers... :rolleyes: Click the link I provided, in the 'Hint' at the bottom of my previous reply. :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

Just a guess, but you might want to look how to read/write from the port as you insert a dongle there. But I never did it so I might be totally wrong :-) V. Stop smoking so you can: Enjoy longer the money you save. Moviereview Archive

Gopal_Kanchana wrote: how to do same thing in VS2005 IDE. You need VisualSVN[^] which is a plug in for Visual Studio. * Developer Day Scotland 2 - Free community conference * The Blog of Colin Angus Mackay Vogon Building and Loan advise that your planet is at risk if you do not keep up repayments on any mortgage secured upon it. Please remember that the force of gravity can go up as well as down.

Using macros, you can redesign your coding 'language' on the fly until your code doesn't even remotely look like C++. If you've seen as much bad C++ as I have, you know why many consider macros evil. David Anton http://www.tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com C++ to C# Converter C++ to VB Converter C++ to Java Converter VB & C# to Java Converter Java to VB & C# Converter Instant C#: VB to C# converter Instant VB: C# to VB converter Instant C++: convert VB, C#, or Java to C++