IMO, the warning is invalid in this situation. If the method was simply returning Bar then you would not get the warning, so it's not understanding that returned Foo requires Bar so should not be disposed. Dave Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum. Astonish us. Be exceptional. (Pete O'Hanlon) BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)

Hi, I was thinking of a Vector as it exists in Java (it is similar to C#'s ArrayList). If your Vector is just a fixed and small number of coordinates, of course it can be a value type. :) Luc Pattyn [My Articles]

gumi_r@msn.com wrote: thanks for the tip about Reflector. Saved my ass more than once :rolleyes:

Yeah, I didn't know it. Thank you (though seems rather clumsy...). If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

Hi, Have you tried to override the delete operator?;) Regards, Eli

No worries, glad to help ( and glad that people are still learning C++ :-) ) Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog

bump! Anyhelp plz?