you may be binding to the wrong adapter... to see if this is the problem, change the order of the adapters: To view order of adapters: on cmd prompt type: ipconfig (the result will be the default bind order) To change order of adapters: last adapter enabled will become last in the list (so change the order by disabling/enabling in the network connections menu accordingly) if you determine that this is the problem, then you have to manage your adapter binding a bit smarter in the code.

That is why SMS is more suited for the occasion I guess. :thumbsup: Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, and improve readability.

The clues are in the question: 1) Make sure "WindowAplication1.Properties.Resources.resources" was correctly embedded or linked into assembly "WindowApplication1" at compile time 2) All the satellite assemblies required are loadable and fully signed. Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

jainiraj wrote: I want a tool to plot real time graph for .net platform .NET isn't a "realtime" platform, nor is Windows. jainiraj wrote: The data which has to be plotted is continuously coming in some time interval.Is there any tool available? Write an application that handles the communication and stuffs the data in a queue. Have another one draw some nice graph using that data. There should be some articles on charts. Bars or pies? jainiraj wrote: Also Performance issue is there.Performance also matters when I am using the tool. Simple; don't use VB6 :) As a reminder; cross-posting isn't a nice thing to do. I are Troll :suss:

Since your question mentions the fact that you want to do this in .NET I would expect the .NET Framework forum would be a good start. I note that you have been a CP member for over a year now so you should be familiar with the posting guidelines. Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash

I found the same idiot responded with the same answer to several of my posts today. Just a spammer... He's been assimilated, per SOP. Will Rogers never met me.

You can do that by changing readonly property as below. private void dataGridView1_CellContentClick(object sender, DataGridViewCellEventArgs e) { for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++) { if (i == e.RowIndex) { dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value = true; dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].ReadOnly = true; } else { dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value = false; dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].ReadOnly = false; } } }

See this, (there are bound to be other definitions on the net if you go looking; BroadCast Adddress[^] Basically, 255.255.255.255 is a broadcast address and will only broadcast to end points within the same network subnet/segment. And a little refresher on UDP[^] Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn CPRepWatcher now available as Packaged Chrome Extension, visit my articles for link.

Try this one; Private Sub axWinsockListen_ConnectionRequest(ByVal requestID As Long) I wouldn't connect to many applications at once; VB6 wasn't built with multithreading support in mind. I are Troll :suss:

Put the different groups of options buttons in separate frames you can make the frame borders invisible if it spoils the look of the form

It's obvious you're new to VB development. I highly suggest abandoning VB6 and move to VB.NET before you learn too many of VB6's bad habits. The control you're looking for is the MSFlexGrid. No, I don't have any tutorials on it because I abandonded all VB6 developement almost 10 years ago. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

There's a nice example here[^]. Did you remember to include the reference to the Xml-library? I are Troll :suss:

So do I. But, from MS' point of view, it's dead, buried and decaying. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

As Dave already mentioned, you don't want to call CreateThread from VB6. You can find example-implementations on the internet, but most aren't complete and it seldom a good idea. For an in-depth explanation, check this[^] article. There are some alternatives, like encapsulating your thread in a complete executable. The best option to add multithreading to an existing VB6 application, is by using VB.NET; you can use the InterOp Toolkit[^] to extend your VB6 application with VB.NET specific code. You could create a new form in VB.NET, add as much threading as you like, and load that form from VB6. If it's a new project then you'd best move on to VB.NET. I are Troll :suss:

thanks for ur reply.. I got the solution.. :)

You definiately do not screw around with the Hex function to do this. Have you seen the System.Net.IpAddress class, and it's GetAddressBytes method? You might even look at its HostToMetworkOrder and NetworkToHostOrder methods, depending on what you're doing with the byte version of the address. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

There is no problem with that code. The two snippets are identical. The problem would have to be somewhere else, or this isn't the exact code you're using. Also, are you saying that you're using the old Winsock control, or are you using the socket classes in System.Net? A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

Yep. VB6 has no unsigned integer data types and doesn't have an integer type that supports a number that large. So, it's appending the "#" character to the number to force it to be treated as a Double, which is a floating point type. I highly suggest abandoning any new developement in VB6 and move to VB.NET. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak