You might be trying to help but your thread is against CodeProject rules. It looks like you are advertising a website of yours or your friend. Kindly avoid the same. P.S.: Based on your profile and last activity done by you in 2007, it most certainly looks like a sudden advertising message from you!

r41n© wrote: ust because your car ran that long it doesn't mean every car will. Well, duh... I was giving anecdotal evidence that contradicts your theoretical claims. We're not talking about cars - we're talking about electronics, and we're really not even talking about the fans in a computer. I've been assembling my own systems since 1985, and have been leaving them on 24/7 since 1980. I've *never* had a system fail in all that time. "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

Hey Nithil, Nikhil Bandekar wrote: My test application is deployed by name http://testsoft/login.aspx My live application which has a public ip is by name http://255.26.235.22/login.aspx The above code shows that you are using Absolute Path instead of relative path. Eg, You must use Response.Redirect("Login.aspx") where Login.aspx file is located in the same root not Response.Redirect("http://testsoft/login.aspx"). Nikhil Bandekar wrote: Is there any solution related to global.asax file ? If any kindly let me know. As per knowledge nope... But I have seen some application are frame the URL in Global.asa or Global.asax file. You check both scenario. Regards, Venkatesh Mookkan. Software Engineer, India My: Website | Yahoo Group | Blog Spot

This[^] works for me. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog

Personally, I just include an empty version of my database to be installed along with the .exe. You can do this in the File System Editor of a setup/deployment project in .net. Here is an MSDN article that covers the basics.[^] And I know I've read a few other articles here at codeproject that have been very helpful...but I don't have them saved so you'll have to do some searching. Hope this helps.

hi try to excute this query : SELECT Count(*) AS boos_count, book_title FROM books_table GROUP BY books_table.book_title Tamimi - Code

Hi, Actually it depends up on your taste. Because using both you can develop good applications in asp.net. Although I use c# only but it is again my own preference. Here are some points which has been given by other person(in code project some time back) on why to use C#: :) This isn't a slam on VB.NET, but rather, some positives about using C# instead of other .NET languages: * It's at the forefront of research: most of the language innovation at MS Research is being poured into C#, trickling down to other languages: generics, language integrated query, lambda expressions, expression trees, continuations, extension methods, heck, the whole .NET FCL was written in C#. As it usually goes, other languages get these features trickled down to them, but C# is at the fore. * The primary language: being the primary .NET language has its perks, such as tools that only work with C#, a majority of books on .NET are C#-based, demos, examples, even tools like the recently released XNA Game Studio are C#-only. * C#, Java, C++, hey, even Javascript languages transition to one another far more easily than the verbose VB.NET. This means more devs are likely to understand your code, simply because of the fact they are all based on C-like syntax. * No supporting libraries: VB.NET uses the Microsoft.VisualBasic library and other supporting libraries that bring a lot of ugly cruft over from VB6. No such thing in C#, and is another reason why some .NET tools won't support VB.NET. Again, look at the recent XNA Studio; you can't write VB.NET code on the XBox360 because those extra VB dependencies haven't been ported to the XBox360 platform. * A fresh start. Unlike VB.NET, we don't have ugly, non-conforming libraries brought over from the old world of VB6, and all the bad practices that originated there. * C# can do some things VB.NET can't easily do. Need to load a private font? Need fast access to a bitmap's pixels? Need to interop with pointers? All those things can be done natively and easily in C#, but require rather bloated work-arounds in VB.NET. A private font? Say you've got a great font for your client app. But the font may not be installed on the end-user's system. You *could* embed the font as an app resource, but then you'd have to copy the font into %windir%\fonts directory, and that requires administrator priveleges, not to mention lots of disk access. What you can instead do is embed the font as a resource in your app, then load it and use it in your app without having

you are welcome Tamimi - Code

This good posting by Frank Kerrigan will probably point you in the right direction. http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/PrettyDatagrids.asp. Good luck, Tim Robertson Dallas, Georgia

Thank you very much it works but i changed the code little bit by typing datecontrol.value instead of date property and it works fine Thanks a lot. Nikhil Bandekar Mumbai, India

Hi , The easyest way is copy the database file and attact it in client machine. This example attaches two files from pubs to the current server. EXEC sp_attach_db @dbname = N'pubs', @filename1 = N'c:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\Data\pubs.mdf', @filename2 = N'c:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL\Data\pubs_log.ldf' Hava a nice day.:) !alien!