Stan Shannon wrote:
we need to first bomb our own leftist elements into oblivion
Exactly! Now there is an example of true patriotism! Don't question your government it's not patriotic. The patriotic thing to do is murder the citizens that do question their government. Your righteousness escapes me.
-- signature under construction --
-pete
SaRath C wrote:
at our point of view, operator new has a standard form and a predefined way which it should be used. I just indicated about that fact.
ah, I understand now, thanks. :)
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Gary Kirkham wrote: And the train keeps rolling... The Rhetoric Train :zzz::zzz::zzz:
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Richard Stringer wrote: we dirty Americans would be accused of breaking our promises Been there... done that. Are you claiming that the US has never been guilty of that? Doesn't seem like a good way to make a point. But, that's just my opinion... I could be wrong.
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Wouldn't that only require simple Math? I see your :confused: and raise you :confused::confused: :-D
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Mike Gaskey wrote: come'on Joe you can't have it both ways. Exactly, you can't claim people need to do the patriotic thing and support the President in his call to war, and then blame them for flip-flopping after the evidence of WMDs vanished later.
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Richard Stringer wrote: I am sure that as a senior Senator he had access to the same intel that the President had. What he nor anyone else had access to was the activities of the administration pressing for the reports to depict rationale for declaring war. Therefore no reason to doubt the reports. X|
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Mike Gaskey wrote: How many of these insurance-less folks are driving cars with spinners or watching a color TV? The # of people without insurce is a meaningless statistic unless you tell me how many of them have made other spending choices. Why? So if you were told that 50% "could" have paid for their own insurance but purchased cars and tv's instead what would that change? What about the other 50%? Or are you asserting that all poor people are "lazy and need to work harder"? Yes we are all well aware of the fact that not all people have good work ethic and that some low income people are there due to their choices. But painting all low income people with that same brush has nothing to do with truth, rather it is a perfect example of a "bunch of compost". You can try to spin the facts if you want to but at the end of the day it is just rhetoric.
-- signature under construction --
-pete
It would be equally simple to write the same type of rhetoric about Republicans along a theme of deception and avarice dropping names like Lay and Halliburton. :zzz::zzz::zzz:
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Joel Holdsworth wrote: Why not overridable sorry, overridable is not the same. Joel Holdsworth wrote: somthing more intuitive.
public:
intuitive void execute()=0;
:-D
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Not a problem they get a "virtual" spot. Those still living get a "static" or "private" spot. :-D
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Colin Angus Mackay wrote: It is a bit cowardly to vote a one and not say why. I think we have at least one serial voter. :-D
-- signature under construction --
-pete
To have thread affinity means to be "bound to the thread". Therefore the object can only be used safely from that thread. In the case of MFC, some objects are bound to threads through MFCs use of Thread Local Storage. Attempting to use the object in a thread other than the thread it is bound to will result in errors since the thread local storage data is not present. Hope that helps?
-- signature under construction --
-pete
jan larsen wrote: but you catch my point. Well I wouldn't bet on it, but I have believed it was humor, am I right? :-D
-- signature under construction --
-pete
My favorite Englishman! Very :cool: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040823/ap_en_ce/people_jimmy_page_1[^]
-- signature under construction --
-pete
This should help. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore/html/_core_Multithreading.3a_.Programming_Tips.asp[^]
-- signature under construction --
-pete
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&refer=columnist_sperling&sid=ag.ujNZ.MUjo[^] Even if one puts aside the meager growth in June and July and looks only at the period the Bush administration seems most proud of -- the 12 months following the passage of their tax cut in late May 2003 -- it turns out that job growth was weaker than in any comparable period in a recovery since the 1930s. The 110,000 new jobs created, on average, each month in those 12 months weren't even enough to absorb new workers entering the labor market, and that figure was weaker than even the worst year of job growth during the Clinton presidency. Indeed, however you cut the job numbers since the passage of Bush's 2003 tax package, our economy hasn't seen such weak employment growth in a recovery in 50 years. More facts. X| Not hard to find if you "want to". Stop the rhetoric and get real. <edit> Here is one small business owners assessment of Bush Tax cuts. http://news.statesmanjournal.com/article.cfm?i=85676[^] </edit>
-- signature under construction --
-pete
Bush campaign TV ad uses the Olympics to promote W. http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/summer04/gen/news/story?id=1864173[^] An act of Congress, last revised in 1999, grants the USOC exclusive rights to such terms as "Olympic," derivatives such as "Olympiad" and the five interlocking rings. It also specifically says the organization "shall be nonpolitical and may not promote the candidacy of an individual seeking public office." The response from the Bush campaign officials: Bush campaign aides contend that the law in question gives the committee exclusive rights only to use the Olympics name to sell goods or services or to promote athletic competition. The campaign avoided using the symbol of five rings in the ad, the aides said. Stanzel said the ad will continue to run for the last two weeks of August. Just full of integrity those guys are. X|
-- signature under construction --
-pete
I could post links to the latest developments in the SBV bullsh*t but I would rather look at real issues and real facts. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=3&u=/ap/20040827/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/census_poverty[^] WASHINGTON - The number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.3 million last year, while the ranks of the uninsured swelled by 1.4 million, the Census Bureau reported Thursday. It was the third straight annual increase for both categories. Not a 35 year old story, a FACT.
-- signature under construction --
-pete
I can't find anything in what you posted to indicate a problem. Also your description of the behavior does not even indicate that the socket has anything to do with the dialog closing. I can't even think of a theory of what could cause the dialog to close without at least firing an assertion. You might try using Spy to watch the messages arriving in the dialog that closes to get some indication of why/how it is closing. Also Debugging and Tracing techniques could prove helpful. Have you ever done a tutorial/sample socket project? I believe MSDN has something like a chat or something that uses CAsyncSocket or CSocket.
-- signature under construction --
-pete