I actually raised this question because I'm at odds with the design. Thanks for the sanity check :)

But just think how the crowd will cheer when you do this... object o = 1; ;-P

Unfortunately I replaced an image without renaming it, so you're seeing the old "add" image instead of the new (which is just a 'digg' image). Ctrl+F5 will force a refresh and you'll see it as it should be. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

RyanEK wrote: As a consumer i'm pretty outraged, but as a developer i'm a little understanding. Should they be held accountable for this or should I just let it go and just never shop there again? I wouldn't be understanding, and I don't know how you could think to do anything other than leave that site, what if it was your details on someone elses computer next time, only they're less honest. He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.

The same here, but I was 16. What a present! If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

But its not complete MVP has its rule(voting system) and its not good source if we want to see helpful users. :) Of one Essence is the human race thus has Creation put the base One Limb impacted is sufficient For all Others to feel the Mace (Saadi )

It is feasible, though not in the way of putting the control into designer mode. Doing this will put the control to the user on what can or can not be access by a user group. We did one of the web application using javascript (only activated for admin logon) to bring up a dialog box to set the read/write/etc access. On desktop application, you can probably sub class the controls, use mouse right click to bring up a context menu or a dialog box to set the access.