above is correct answer. search public Unit test project. Like NUnit in this case. GitHub - nunit/nunit: NUnit 3 Framework[^] I think you do not begin from scratch but if you confident with your abilities, you contact original writer and suggest yourself as contributor on NUnit project in example. Regards Toha

This is for Aerospcase domain project purpose. For Aircraft project where we need for Aircraft parameters to be converted into Deciamal, Octal, hex , binary and engineerig formats.

Hi yes checkboxes are binded.

You might use GetWindowLong with GWL_WNDPROC as second parameter (see MSDN[^]). Veni, vidi, vici.

Should be easy, you won't even get to the dll linking stage (which happens after compilation) if you don't have the necessary lib files included for the linker, so you'll get an error. ...and like Jochen already mentioned, it's customary to keep the same name.

This is what gets me about C++ dogma. I have seen worse C++ code than C code. It is capale of being more obtuse, messy, confusing and dangerous. Bad code is bad code, and dogma doesnt solve this, that why I write good code and leave the dogma at the church. :) ============================== Nothing to say.

If there is no URL mentioned in the book then a Google search is probably your best bet. I notice that this book is more than 10 years old so it may well no longer be available. The best things in life are not things.

I seriously doubt Google translate is accurate with Chinese (although probably worth a try)... I would just about guess doing it by hand is the only viable option.

Use GetFileVersionInfo().

The C Runtime to the rescue: // Get the full path to our process image _TCHAR *pszExeFullPath; int nReturn = ATL_CRT_ERRORCHECK(_get_tpgmptr(&pszExeFullPath)); I use the ATL_CRT_ERRORCHECK() macro to provide some runtime handling of possible CRT errors. /* Charles Oppermann */ http://weblogs.asp.net/chuckop

Thank you, man. :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

SendMessage() is a synchronous call, meaning it waits for the code and result of the operation (framework equivalent of making a blocking function call), whereas PostMessage() is asynchronous, meaning there's no waiting for result. Where is either useful? -SendMessage(): Your continuation of execution depends on the result of the operation and/or the CWnd's lie in the same thread (blocking calls are a non-issue). -PostMessage(): Non-blocking is essential, such is the case for threaded programming.

You've written in the memory block beyond the allocated memory size. If you are using the pointer arithmetic, check for your logic for advancing through the items in the array. Check for your memory writing logic too... [Delegates]      [Virtual Desktop]      [Tray Me !] -Malli...! :rose:****

yes thank you. I have to call OnClose() of View's frame.

ok thank you.

Two people giving the exact same answer as me, it must be true ;)

I'm not sure how you would get table modifications, however getting RECORD modifications is a VERY simple excercise, you do have a number of options. ALL of them require additional columns/fields to be added to the tables you want to monitor. We monitor all tables so we have a Modified and ModifiedBy on all tables. Add a timestamp field to the table and trigger it every time a record is saved, I think you can trigger this in access, not sure anymore. From your UI pass in the userid and datetime whenever you write back to the database. In your update/insert query automatically gather the current user and the datetime and add then to the update/save Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

You're welcome! :)

chk this ResizableFormView[^]